Devotion to Our Lady |
|
TO ENLARGE THE MAPS, HOLD DOWN THE "CONTROL KEY" (CTRL) WHILE PRESSING THE "PLUS-SIGN KEY" (+) AS MANY TIMES AS ARE NEEDED.
TO RETURN TO "NORMAL VIEWING SIZE" HOLD DOWN THE "CONTROL KEY" WHILE PRESSING THE "ZERO KEY" (0). |
God's Ways Are Not Our Ways
God likes to be different! Perhaps it is because He is different! So we should be surprised if He doesn't think and act as we would think and act. In fact, God tells us, through Isaias His prophet, that “‘My thoughts are not your thoughts; nor your ways My ways!’ saith the Lord. For as the Heavens are exalted above the Earth, so are My ways exalted above your ways, and My thoughts above your thoughts!” (Isaias 55:8-9). Nowhere is that statement proven to more true than in the birth of the Only-begotten Son of God! “And it came to pass, that in those days there went out a decree from Caesar Augustus, that the whole world should be enrolled. This enrolling was first made by Cyrinus, the governor of Syria. And all went to be enrolled, every one into his own city. And Joseph also went up from Galilee, out of the city of Nazareth into Judea, to the city of David, which is called Bethlehem: because he was of the house and family of David, to be enrolled with Mary, his espoused wife, who was with child” (Luke 2:1-5). It was Bethlehem was destined to be the birthplace of the Son of God, the Messias, and Mary was far from Bethlehem at that time! “And thou, Bethlehem Ephrata, art a little one among the thousands of Juda! Out of thee shall He come forth unto Me that is to be the Ruler in Israel!” (Micheas 5:2). Had God forgotten all about this? Why wasn’t Mary in Bethlehem, but, instead, in far-away Nazareth? You would have thought that if God was planning the birth of His Only-begotten Son, then He would have made things as smooth as possible for the Mother of that Only-begotten Son! Since there were no cars, buses, trains or planes in those days—you would think that God would arrange for Mary's safe arrival in Bethlehem (for that is where God prophesied His Son would be born) in good time, so as to avoid any hardship or pain for the Mother of the Son of God! If we were planning it, we would perhaps have her already living in Bethlehem. Not so with God! To the human mind, it looks as though He had totally forgotten about it and has Mary running down there at the last minute—nine months pregnant! It's a Long Way to Bethlehem Mary, It's a Long Way to Go... The direct distance, as the crow flies, from Nazareth (in northern Israel) to Bethlehem (just south west of Jerusalem) is about 70 miles. It is estimated that Mary and Joseph probably walked more than 90 miles before reaching their destination of Bethlehem. Mary and Joseph were compelled to make the long journey to Bethlehem because of a census that had been proclaimed by Caesar Augustus, the Roman emperor. Joseph hailed from Bethlehem in Judea, and the decree required citizens within the Roman Empire to register at their birthplaces or ancestral “home town.” We don’t know the exact route Joseph & Mary took, since that is not recorded in the Gospel accounts. However, there are two probable ones: Route 1: The Trade Route – marked with a black dashed line on the map (see alongside). Route 2: The Jordan River Valley Route – marked with a red dashed line on the map (see alongside). The shortest route (Route 1 on the map) to Bethlehem was directly south through Samaria (being approximately 80 miles in length), but the walk would have been more demanding, since it crosses the hilly terrain of Samaria (today’s central Israel) which would have proven to be particularly arduous for Mary, who was in the late stages of pregnancy. There is also the “social landscape” to take into account—in that the Jews hated the Samaritans, and the other route (what I’ve called the Jordan River Valley Route) allowed Jews to circumvent Samaria altogether, thus avoiding the hostile Samaritans in the region, who could have posed a threat to the two travelers, and the knowledge that it would be difficult for them to find lodgings due to racial antagonism. The Trade Route through Samaria would also have exposed the travelers to more arid conditions, due to the elevation of their surroundings. It's believed that Mary and Joseph chose a safer and more comfortable longer route (Route 2) being the flatter way—which would have been easier going for the pregnant Mary. This route took them southeast from Nazareth through the Jezreel Valley, to the Jordan Valley. Then continuing south to Jericho, from where it proceeds up through the Judean Desert to Jerusalem and onward to Bethlehem. This route is longer, being approximately 90 miles in length, but the climate in the valleys would have been more comfortable than the arid hills of Samaria. Joseph, Mary and any others who might traveled with them, would still have been obliged to make the steep 16 mile climb up the road from the Jordan valley near Jericho to the heights on which Jerusalem rests. In Jesus’ time, this section of the road was called “the Way of Blood”, because of the danger from robbers. Incidentally, this section of road is where Jesus’ parable of the Good Samaritan is set. It ascends 3,500 feet over 16 miles, which makes for quite a steep gradient. The ancients were thought to have averaged around 20 miles per day—which, if you have ever walked 20 miles, is one mighty achievement—it is almost the distance that is run in a marathon! Yet we must remember that Mary was in the ninth month of her pregnancy! Ask any woman in her ninth month of pregnancy if she fancies a four or five day outing walking around 20 miles a day over quite rough terrain (no asphalted roads back then)—and see what kind of answer she gives you! Therefore, we can imagine Mary and Joseph travelling at about 10 to 12 miles per day, which would then have taken about 8-10 days for Mary and Joseph to reach their destination. Regardless of the route, the journey would have been quite arduous and was probably a tense and anxious prospect for the young, pregnant mother. By the end of their difficult trek, the couple would have walked more than 90 miles; much of that distance across difficult terrain. And this trip was very much uphill and downhill. It was not simple. Joseph and Mary likely would have traveled only 10 to 12 miles a day because of Mary's impending delivery. However, if consult the revelations made to the mystics, then it seems as though they took five full days in traveling from Nazareth to Bethlehem—and that includes a day of rest on the Sabbath! |
TO ENLARGE MAPS: Hold down your "CONTROL" (CTRL) key while pressing your "PLUS SIGN" (+) key as many times as needed. TO RETURN TO NORMAL VIEW: Hold down your "CONTROL" (CTRL) key while pressing your "ZERO SIGN" (0) key.
|
Tough Times Ahead!
As mentioned already, this 100 mile walk was going to be a tough one for someone who is nine-months pregnant. Bear in mind that Mary did not have to go with Joseph. In ancient times, it was only menfolk who were counted. For example, when speaking of Our Lord's miraculous feeding of the 4,000 and then the 5,000 persons, the Bible speaks of 4,000 and 5,000 menfolk—you can add onto that your own "guestimate" as to how many women and children there may have been. The Bible is consistent in its view that there were 600,000 Israelite men (excluding women and children) who left Egypt, which would thus, according to many scholars, make the total population of the Exodus anywhere from 2.5 million to 4 million people. The Bible tells us that 600,000 men on foot left Egypt (Exodus 12:37). It again mentions 600,000 men on foot leaving Egypt (Numbers 11:21). Then we read of there being 603,550 men over 20 years of age at Mt. Sinai (Numbers 1:45-46) and 601,730 males arriving at the Jordan River (Numbers 26:51). Who Counts? Thus, it was Joseph “who counted” in the eyes of those making the census of Caesar Augustus, not women and children. Mary could have just as well stayed behind in the safety of Nazareth and let Joseph “go it alone.” However, Mary also knew Holy Scripture very well and she knew that the prophets had prophesied that her Son would be born in Bethlehem. No doubt she must have wondered how on earth that was going to happen—and now Providence provided the answer—even though it was a “tough call” (for a pregnant woman) at a “tough time” (the middle of winter). Yet Mary was not only a holy girl, but also a tough girl! Which Way To Go? The exact way which Mary and Joseph took to get from Nazareth to Bethlehem is not described in any of the Gospels. However, according to the writings of the ancient Jewish historian Josephus Flavius: “It is the custom of the Galileans at the time of festival to pass through the Samaritan territory on their way to the Holy City.” This is the more direct route in straight-line distance—but there are two reasons why it was probably not the way Joseph and Mary went. First of all, of all the possible routes, it is the most physically demanding, with constant ups and downs through the hills—and it took the traveler directly through Samaritan country, and the Jews preferred to have no dealings with the Samaritans “For the Jews do not communicate with the Samaritans” (John 4:9). From their hometown of Nazareth Mary and Joseph would have headed southeast, between the mountains to the north—of which Mount Thabor was part—and the mountains bordering onto Samaria in the south, walking down to the River Jordan some miles south of the southern shores of the Sea of Galilee. There they would have tuned directly south in order to hug the River Jordan along its winding valley south towards Jericho. The route at first stayed on the west shores of the Jordan River. Just south of Beth Shean, the route crossed the River Jordan from west to east, into what is now modern-day Jordan. The route was easier and safer from there to Jericho, where they would cross back over the River Jordan, from the east bank to the west bank. The temperature in this fertile green valley would have been slightly more mild—though it was still winter weather—than would be found on the mountains around Bethlehem. Dangers of the Road To this point the route would have traversed mostly smooth terrain. From Jericho to Bethlehem would have required going through the barren Wilderness of Judea. Here especially the protection afforded by group travel would have been essential. It was along this road the Good Samaritan encountered the man who had been beaten and robbed. It was the norm for people to travel these routes in groups to avoid robbers. Usually, a self-appointed guide and protector was paid a fee, in order to go along with his group. Both the trade-route through Samaria, and the alternative route along the Jordan River, were notorious for both robbers and wild animals, such as bears. Bandits, pirates of the desert and robbers were also among the common hazards along the major trade routes like the one Joseph and Mary would have traveled, says the Fr. Peter Vasko, a Catholic priest and director of the Holy Land Foundation. The threat of outlaws often forced solitary travelers to join trade caravans for protection. One of the most terrifying dangers in ancient Palestine was the heavily forested valley of the Jordan River. Lions and bears lived in the woods, and travelers had to fend off wild boars. Archeologists have unearthed documents warning travelers of the forest’s dangers. A professor of New Testament Biblical archeology, James F. Strange, who annually leads excavation teams in the area of Nazareth, says: “We have no idea how difficult it was! It was a fairly grueling trip. In antiquity, the most we find people traveling is 20 miles a day. And this trip was very much uphill and downhill. It was not simple. It's in the 30’s during the day and rains like heck! It's nasty, miserable! And at night it would be freezing!” What To Take? To protect themselves during inclement weather, Mary and Joseph would most likely have been wearing heavy woolen cloaks, made to shed rain and snow. Under their cloaks, the ancient residents wore long robes, belted at the waist. Tube-like socks and enclosed shoes protected the feet. Mary and Joseph had to bring their own provisions. “In wineskins, they carried water,” said Fr. Vasko, “and they carried a lot of bread! Breakfast would be dried bread, lunch would be oil with dried bread, and herbs with oil and dried bread in the evening.” There is no donkey mentioned in the Bible account for Mary to ride, but that does not mean that there was no donkey. When you are headed-out on anywhere from a 7 to 10 day walk, there are a certain amount of supplies that you need to take with you. Mary, being nine-months pregnant, would not be up to carrying much of anything for 100 miles—she was already carrying the Savior of the world. The revelations made to the mystics speak of donkey accompanying them—one that Joseph had borrowed for the journey. Walking, though drudgery, might have been easier for a woman nine months pregnant than riding a donkey. Even though we instinctively imagine Mary to be a fully grown woman, Mary was actually a teenager at the time, around 14 or 15 years old, and no doubt a hardy one at that, as most people of the time had to be in order to survive. |
TO ENLARGE MAPS: Hold down your "CONTROL" (CTRL) key while pressing your "PLUS SIGN" (+) key as many times as needed. TO RETURN TO NORMAL VIEW: Hold down your "CONTROL" (CTRL) key while pressing your "ZERO SIGN" (0) key.
BELOW: From Herod’s palace, the road begins a quick and difficult ascent into the Judean wilderness. Known biblically as the “Ascent of Adumim,” this road travels on the southern side of the Wadi Qilt (Josh. 15:7). In the photo, the Wadi Qilt is the deep gorge running diagonally from the lower right corner and the Ascent of Adumim can be seen just above it. Herod’s palaces are located where the Wadi Qilt enters the Jordan Valley, and the Dead Sea is 6 miles (10 km.) south. The root of “Adumim” means “red,” and the plural may be translated as “red places.” The name most likely comes from the red earth that appears along the route.
|
The Easy Part Comes First
Just as in the spiritual life, the easy part comes first. The journey through the Jezreel Valley—between the mountains that included Mount Thabor to the north, and the Samarian mountains to the south—would have been the least dangerous or hazardous part of the journey. The Jordan River Valley would bring the dangers of wild beasts. While the Judean Wildereness between Jericho and Jerusalem would bring the dangers of robbers and murderers along the barren route. The three stages of the spiritual life—for Beginners, the Proficient and the Perfect—likewise bring greater difficulties as we pass through them on our way to the heavenly Jerusalem. From their hometown of Nazareth Mary and Joseph would have headed southeast, between the mountains to the north—of which Mount Thabor was part—and the mountains bordering onto Samaria in the south, walking down to the River Jordan some miles south of the southern shores of the Sea of Galilee. The Jews preferred to have no dealings with the Samaritans “For the Jews do not communicate with the Samaritans” (John 4:9) and so Mary and Joseph would probably have avoided going directly south into Samaria, but would have headed southeast towards the Jordan River Valley—which held its own dangers! A professor of New Testament Biblical archeology, James F. Strange, who annually leads excavation teams in the area of Nazareth, says: “We have no idea how difficult it was! It was a fairly grueling trip. In antiquity, the most we find people traveling is 20 miles a day. And this trip was very much uphill and downhill. It was not simple. It's in the 30’s during the day and rains like heck! It's nasty, miserable! And at night it would be freezing!” Testimony of Someone Having Walked Both Major Routes The following is an account of someone who has walked both of the two major routes from Nazareth to Bethlehem: They would probably have made the journey from Nazareth to Bethlehem by one of two routes. One would have taken them south across the Jezreel Valley, then through the hills of Samaria into Judaea. This is the more direct route in straight-line distance—but there are two reasons it probably was not the way Joseph and Mary went: It is physically demanding, with constant ups and downs through the hills—and it took the traveler directly through Samaritan country, and “the Jews [had] no dealings with the Samaritans” (John 4:9). The other possible route is the one Joseph and Mary more likely traveled. It would have taken them southeast across the Jezreel Valley, connecting with the Jordan Valley, then level or slightly down in elevation all the way to Jericho, then up through the Judaean Desert to Jerusalem and Bethlehem. To discover for myself what each of the routes would have been like, I have walked both of them. Both routes are about ninety-two miles long. Normal walking pace, even with a camel or donkey, is three miles per hour. So a traveler can usually walk between seventeen and twenty-four miles each day. Each route took me about thirty hours to walk—seventeen to twenty miles a day for five days. At that rate, the journey would have taken Joseph and Mary at least four to five days. We wonder where they stayed each night, where and with whom they camped along the way. It would have been a wearying journey for anyone, but especially for a pregnant woman soon to give birth. It was early spring, which can still be very chilly at night in the hill country. However, in the Jordan Valley—which is below sea level—the temperatures would have been mild and pleasant. The last leg of the eastern route would have been the hardest of all. Jericho is the lowest city on the globe, and Jerusalem and Bethlehem are situated right in the top of the hills. From Jericho’s desert to Bethlehem is an uphill hike of 3,500 feet. How exhausted Mary must have been! The journey from Jericho to Jerusalem is an arduous trip of 18 miles. From an elevation of 800 feet below sea level to the summit of the Mount of Olives at 3,000 feet above sea level, Jesus and the other pilgrims would have climbed nearly 4,000 feet in the day’s journey. Furthermore, the terrain of the Judean Wilderness is dry, rugged, and with few sources of water.
|
Ancient Medical Advice
Ancient medicinal systems suggest that pregnant women avoid too much talking, too much walking, going to sleep too late at night, too much traveling, etc. Modern Medical Advice Yet walking, even in the latter stages of pregnancy, is not a bad thing in itself and can be helpful—within reason and within prudent boundaries. As one doctor writes: “As your baby descends into your pelvic cavity, you may find yourself prone to sharp, stabbing pains at the base of your spine or in the middle of your pelvic bone, making it uncomfortable to walk. The overall loosening of your ligaments has been known to cause the knees and wrists to feel weak, too, making even light lifting tricky and walking less inviting. Continue to exercise gently every day. ” Other medical sources say that “Walking is one of the best cardiovascular exercises for pregnant women – especially because it keeps you fit without requiring special equipment or extra cost. It's also a safe activity to continue throughout all nine months of pregnancy” … “Walking is one of the best exercises during pregnancy for normal delivery, especially after 37th week” … “Walking tips for the third trimester for those who are of advanced fitness: Toward the end of the trimester, try walking 25-50 minutes a day, five to six days a week” … “Keep up your walking regimen as long as you can, but avoid hiking trails or uneven terrain that could put you off balance” … “Engaging in strenuous physical activities is a complete NO!” Testimony of Pregnant Mothers Another pregnant mother writes: “I walked 8 miles every other day.” Another pregnant mother writes: “I'm 39 weeks pregnant and have lost part of my mucous plug, but while I'm feeling very achy and sore labor seems like a long way off. I have been doing a lot of walking to try to get things going. I walk about three to four hours every day—not briskly, just at a normal pace. I usually walk for an hour at a time and I'm not sweating or out of breath at all.” Another writes: “I was 36 weeks … I would walk up and down hills for at least an hour a day.” Down in the Valley Though the Jordan River Valley was perhaps a little milder in weather—not being at altitude and even below sea level—it was not mild as regards the animals that prowled therein. Even in ancient times there were strong warnings issued to travelers to beware of attacks by lions, bears and wild boars. No doubt the angels were with Mary and Joseph—but just saying!! The route, though, would be rugged and undulating. Sometimes hugging the river valley, sometimes having to ascend the high escarpments along the river. No paved, asphalted roads. For a pregnant woman—whose balance is already challenged—it is not an easy portion of the journey, being both physically harder than the Jezreel Valley portion of the journey from Nazareth to the Jordan River Valley. The Steep Climb Out of Jericho
How long does it take to walk from Jericho to Jerusalem? One modern day hiker says: “It took me 8 hours today to cover the distance of 15 miles, with an elevation increase of about 3,400 feet. Not counting breaks, our group of 15 walked for six and a half hours.” Another hiker writes: “We were almost to Jerusalem, and we were tired. We began to make our final ascent to the Mount of Olives. At this point we had been walking for about 8½ hours. We had just walked 17 miles and now we had to walk the last mile at an intense incline. Previous to this hike, when I read in the Bible that Jesus traveled from Jericho to Jerusalem, it meant very little to me. I had no idea how tiring such a journey would be!” Whereas the Jordan River Valley was infested by lions, bears and wild boars, the Judean Desert (the mountainous area between Jericho in the valley and Jerusalem in the mountains) was infested by robbers and murderers. The Ups and Downs of Traveling Although Jericho is northeast of Jerusalem, travelers go “down” to Jericho and “up” to Jerusalem. The Jewish historian Josephus (AD 37–93) explained that the first-century road was approximately one hundred and fifty Roman stadioi, or about eighteen miles long. A traveler descended from Jerusalem’s height, approximately 2,500 feet above sea level, to Jericho’s depth, some 1,825 feet below sea level, or in the case of Mary and Joseph, they had to climb around 4,325 feet from Jericho to Jerusalem. Travelers, merchants, pilgrims, and soldiers have for centuries gone down to go up (traveling northeast to Jericho) and gone up to go down (traveling southwest to Jerusalem). Drastic Climatic Changes Such a dramatic change in height brought with it a startlingly rapid shift in environmental conditions that must have proven very uncomfortable and even exhausting for anyone making the journey. The steep and confined slope encouraged the formation of a “rain-shadow.” While Jerusalem received about twenty inches of rainfall a year and experienced a Mediterranean climate, Jericho received only eight inches of rain a year and was more African in its climatic orientation. The climatic changes produced unique environmental markers. After the point along the journey where rainfall amounted to sixteen inches annually, there were no more trees. After the twelve-inch rainfall line, vegetation was reduced to a cover of steppe shrubs, and finally, at the eight-inch line and beyond, only desert plants found enough moisture to survive. Even without the ever present threat of bandits, it was a precipitously arduous, dry, and dangerous trek. The Bloody Dangerous Part of the Road At a point approximately five miles from Jericho and thirteen miles out of Jerusalem, the traveler arrived at a pass that is approximately 1,885 feet above sea level and 1655 feet above Jericho. In all likelihood the Roman road went through here; it is the shortest route between the two cities. The name of the pass in Arabic is tal `at ed-damm, which means Ascent of Blood. The Arabic corresponds to the Hebrew that means Ascent of Adummim (Josue 15:7 and 18:17). Adummim means red objects, which in this case most likely referred to the red rock found at the site. The Christian historian Eusebius (260–340) argued that there was a castle here, and the St. Jerome (347–420) explained that the name was given because of the blood that bandits repeatedly shed at this place. When a Road is Not a Road In the ancient world the development of roadways, over difficult stretches of land, only occurred according to need. Footpaths were acceptable in societies where the chief preoccupation was the acquisition of food for family and livestock and the beasts of burden were wild asses, donkeys, and mules. But the appearance of the horse for riding and the camel as a beast of burden necessitated roadways that were adaptable for both the horseshoe and the wide, sensitive foot of the camel. It was at this point that pathways were turned into roadways, and later into more complete roads that could accommodate trade and military movement. Expansion of a road network was thus a clear indication of the growth and prosperity of a region. The roadway between Jerusalem and Jericho experienced such expansion during the first century after Christ, when the area prospered from both trade and pilgrimages. In the time of Herod the Great’s second temple, hundreds of thousands of pilgrims made the journey three times a year on feast days. The main road from Jericho to Jerusalem became a natural conduit connecting the trading caravans, Roman military convoys, and pilgrims. In fact, the quantity of travel and the status of the travelers made the road an inviting target for the many bandit gangs that roamed the countryside. Archaeological evidence indicates that the Romans judged the strategic roadway to be unsafe. Sentry posts were established along the route, most probably to act as protection against bandits who recognized that the surrounding desert allowed for easy escape and provided a secure place for hiding. Many persons who traveled the road were attacked, as Jesus’ parable of the Good Samaritan indicates. It should also be noted that the mountain road between Jerusalem and Jericho was not fully engineered until the war of AD 66–70. The Romans undertook the rather complex effort in order to make the road serviceable for the siege machines they were bringing up for use against the Jerusalem city walls. But during the time of Jesus’ ministry, many parts of the Jerusalem-Jericho road were based on a soft, flaky, limestone surface that eroded rapidly. During and after the war the Romans paved the main roads in Palestine and marked them with milestones along the way. Mary and Joseph would not have experienced the ‘luxury’ of these paved roads—their traveling would have been much more difficult. So What Happened On The Road? There is no Scriptural account of any of the events and circumstances of the journey to Bethlehem. The Venerable Mary of Agreda tells us that “the Lord joined some hardships and inconveniences which the divine Mother encountered on the way. For the concourse of people in the taverns, occasioned by the imperial edict, was very disagreeable and annoying to the modest and retiring Virgin-Mother and her spouse. On account of their poverty and timid retirement they were treated with less hospitality and consideration than others, especially the well-to-do; for the world judges, and usually confers its favors, according to outward appearance and according to personal influence. Our holy pilgrims were obliged repeatedly to listen to sharp reprimands in the taverns, at which they arrived tired out by their journey, and in some of them they were refused admittance as worthless and despicable people. Several times they assigned to the Mistress of Heaven and Earth some corner of the hallway; while at others she did not fare even so well, being obliged to retire with her husband to places still more humble and unbecoming in the estimation of the world. |