Coronavirus and Catholicism

WEBPAGES DEALING WITH THE CORONAVIRUS ISSUE
click on the links below

| Coronavirus & Catholicism | Prayers in Times of SIckness, DIsease or Danger | Daily Thoughts for Lent |

SCROLL DOWN TO THE BOTTOM OF THE PAGE FOR THE LATEST ARTICLE (CURRENTLY #20)

Article 19
Is the Thought of Mandatory Vaccination Needling You?

Article 20
Is it a Mutated Virus? Or is it a Mutated Lie?

(these latest articles are found at foot of this page)

Catholics? ... Coronavirus? ... China? ... Connection? ... Chance? ... Coincidental? ... Conspiracy? ... Clues? ... Crazy? ... Calculated?

When you dig a little deeper, strange coincidences seem to emerge! Is it just a coincidence, or is it more than that? God only knows! We can merely speculate! Click on the banner below and see the strange connections.

UPDATED CONTENTS OF THIS PAGE
(new sub-sections added frequently)

1. INTRODUCTION
    (a) The Strange Connection Between Japan's Catholics and China's Catholics
    (b) The distribution of Coronavirus and Catholicism in China

2. POPULATION CONTROL IN CHINA
    (a) Chinese Population Control Policies
    (b) Christian Control Methods

3. DELIBERATE WORLD POPULATION REDUCTION
    (a) Too Many People to Control
    (b) Reduction of Population to around 500 million: 13 out of 14 must disappear

4. GOD'S VACCINE & THE VIRUS OF SIN
    (a) God’s “Vaccine” is Needed!
    (b) The Virus of Sin―the Most Fatal of All Viruses

5. INJECTED WITH THE VACCINE OF FEAR
    (a) The “Fear-Virus” is More Dangerous than Coronavirus
    (b) Injected with the Vaccine of Fear
    (c) Universal Vaccination Program of the World Health Organization

6. TIME FLEW BY ... DEATH FLEW BY ... DEATH BY FLU
    (a) Time Flew By―Flu Over Time
    (b) Charts and Maps

7. THE EFFECTIVENESS OF VACCINES
    (a) How Effective Are Flu Vaccinations?
    (b) Jailed for Opposing Vaccination?

8. TIME FOR PANIC OR TIME FOR PERSPECTIVE?
    (a) Panic or Perspective?
    (b) So What is Happening Where?

9. WHAT THE "SANE" SCIENTISTS ARE SAYING
    (a) TWarming Warning―Warm-Up for Health!
    (b) Sane and Sage Scientific Statements

10. FIGHTING DISEASE ON A NATURAL LEVEL WITHOUT GOD
(a) The Godless Vaccine
    (b) The World Stats
    (c) The USA Stats by State

11. THE CORONAVIRUS OR THE CONALLAVIRUS
    (a) Mountains From Molehills―Cons From Coronas
    (b) The Media Mountains Toppled By Media Molehills
  (c) God-Sent or Man-Made? Holy Hit or Wholly Hoax? Providential or Political?

12. WHICH IS THE GREATEST BATTLE? FIGHTING CORONAVIRUS OR ITS AGENDA?
    (a) Who Lies? WHO Lies!
    (b) Hippocratic Oath Hypocrites!
    (c) Testimonies of Medical Professionals

13. A DANGEROUS SIDE-EFFECT OF CORONAVIRUS IS TOTALITARIANISM
    (a) The Broad Wide Road to Where?
    (b) Totalitarianism Revealed, Unmasked, Explained
    (c) National Emergency Ushers-In Totalitarianism to the USA
(d) Executive Orders Execute Your Rights and Freedoms

14. ANOTHER DANGEROUS SIDE-EFFECT OF CORONAVIRUS IS TOTAL INSANITY OR STUPIDITY
(a) Stupid or Insane?
    (b) Stress, Stupidity and Mental Illness
    (c) Stress Has Made Already "Dumbed-Down" People More Dumb or Stupid

15. W.H.O. says what? Who says W.H.O. is wrong?
W.H.O. says W.H.O. is right! Who do you believe? Do you believe W.H.O.? Who’s W.H.O.? Who is behind W.H.O.?
  (a) What do you know about W.H.O.?
    (b) What’s the purpose of W.H.O.?
    (c) Who is behind W.H.O.?
    (d) Who finances W.H.O.?

16. CORONAVIRUS PANDEMIC OR CORONAVIRUS CONSPIRACY
(a) Increasing Data Exposes the Propaganda
    (b) Lie After Lie Documented

17. THE ALLEGED "SECOND WAVE" & BIDEN'S "VERY DARK WINTER"
(a) Second Wave of Covid Virus OR Second Wave of Covid Lies?
    (b) The Stats Show the Lies

18. THE MASK IS MASKING REALITY
(a) Why Impose Innefective Mask Rules?
    (b) Why Masks Don't Work
(c) The Testimony of True and Honest Medical Experts

19. IS THE THOUGHT OF MANDATORY VACCINATIONS NEEDLING YOU?
(a) Who Likes Being Needled?
    (b) Completely Safe and Effective?
(c) To Needle or Not to Needle? What's the Point?

20. IS IT A MUTATED VIRUS? OR IS IT A MUTATED LIE?
(a)
    (b)

MORE TO FOLLOW. PLEASE KEEP CHECKING FOR LATEST UPDATES

Article 1
INTRODUCTION

The Strange Connection Between Japan’s and China’s Catholics

► JAPAN 1945―The initial idea for this article came as a result of considering the August 9th, 1945, bombing of Nagasaki. God’s inscrutable providence allowed an atomic bomb named “Fat Man” to be dropped from an American B-29 bomber into the heavily populated city of Nagasaki―the city known as the Japanese capital of Catholicism since nearly two-thirds of Japan’s Catholics lived there. The epicenter of the blast was the Urakami district, the heart and soul of Catholicism in Japan since the sixteenth century. The atomic bomb dropped on Nagasaki, on August 9th, was considerably more powerful than the one dropped three days earlier on Hiroshima, where 140,000 of the city’s 255,000 inhabitants were quickly killed. However, technical and weather-related difficulties confined the Nagasaki count to 35,000 dead. Of the 12,000 Catholics in the Urakami district, 8,500 were killed. Many of those not killed, as in the case of Takashi Nagai’s two young children, were spared simply because, by anticipation of the firebombing that came on nearly all the large cities of Japan, they had gone to the countryside; others were serving in the military. Of those who died in the bombing, some were actually worshiping in St. Mary’s Cathedral. Besides these immediate deaths, an estimated 200,000 people of Nagasaki and Hiroshima died from the effects of atomic radiation. Of those who survived, a high percentage lost family members or suffered permanent disabilities.

► CHINA 2019-2020―Fast forward to China in 2020 and you have the same ‘coincidental’ Catholic connection―of, you could say, Catholics being in wrong place at the wrong time. Or, you can also ask: “Is it coincindental?” Just as Nagasaki was the heart and soul of Catholicism in Japan, likewise is the Province of Hubei, with its capital city of Wuhan, the heart and soul of Catholicism in China. Apart from the China’s capital and the immediately surrounding provinces which have a total of 15 Catholic dioceses between them, Hubei Province alone has 11 Catholic dioceses and the largest number of Catholics concentrated in one area of China. Since it has been shown by several scientific sources that the Coronavirus is not a natural virus, but a man-made virus, specifically engineered by man, then its release is obviously less of “chance” incident and more of a “designed” incident. Likewise, you then have to say that the location of its release was not a “chance” location, but a “designed” location. That location just happened to be the largest Catholic concentration in China.

Now, you will of course say―if you have any knowledge of Catholic population statistics―that China has an incredibly small percentage of Catholics. The percentage of Catholics in China’s population is less than 1% ― however, China makes the “Top-Twenty” as regards the total number of Catholics each country possesses.

THE TOP TWENTY AS REGARDS NUMBERS OF CATHOLICS PER COUNTRY

► The “Number-One-Spot” is held by BRAZIL with around 112 million Catholics (54%) in a population of 208 million.
► In 2nnd place comes MEXICO with around 100 million Catholics (80%) in a population of 126 million.
► In 3rd place comes the PHILIPPINES with 85 million Catholics (80%) in a population of 105 million.
► In 4th place comes the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA with 66 million Catholics (20%) in a population of 330 million.
► In 5th place comes ITALY with 42 million Catholics (70%) in a population of 60 million.
► In 6th place comes COLOMBIA with 35 million Catholics (75%) in a population of 48 million.
► In 7th place comes POLAND with 33 million Catholics (85%) in a population of 38 million.
► In 8th place comes FRANCE with 31 million Catholics (47%) in a population of 66 million.
► In 9th place comes SPAIN with 30 million Catholics (66%) in a population of 47 million.
► In 10th place comes CONGO with 28 million Catholics (36%) in a population of 78 million.
► In 11th place comes ARGENTINA with 26 million Catholics (36%) in a population of 42 million.
► In 12th place comes NIGERIA with 24 million Catholics (12%) in a population of 190 million.
► In 13th place comes PERU with 24 million Catholics (74%) in a population of 31 million.
► In 14th place comes GERMANY with 23 million Catholics (27%) in a population of 83 million.
► In 15th place comes VENEZUELA with 21 million Catholics (67%) in a population of 32 million.
► In 16th place comes UGANDA with 16 million Catholics (75%) in a population of 42 million.
► In 17th place comes CANADA with 13 million Catholics (38%) in a population of 36 million.
► In 18th place comes TANZANIA with 12 million Catholics (27%) in a population of 44 million.
► In 19th place comes CHINA with 12 million Catholics (less than 1%) in a population of 1,400 million.
► In 20th place comes INDIA with 12 million Catholics (less than 1%) in a population of 1,280 million.

Notice how, in the above maps, the chief areas of the coronavirus outbreaks correspond, not only to the general distribution of the Chinese population, but also with the general distribution of the Catholic population. You can of course say that the two go together. That is true. Yet you also have to look at the inescapable fact that it all originated in the most populous Catholic area. Hubei Province, with its capital city Wuhan, has the largest concentration of Catholics in China. Food for thought! Only god knows! We can merely speculate!

Archbishop Vigano's Opinions on the Coronavirus Pandemic as an Attack on the Church

First of all―Who is Archbishop Viganò?
Archbishop Viganò was ordained a priest in 1968. He earned a doctorate in both canon and civil law. He entered the diplomatic service of the Holy See in 1973, and worked at the papal diplomatic missions in Iraq and Great Britain. From 1978 to 1989, he held posts at the Secretariat of State. In 1989, he was named Special Envoy and Permanent Observer of the Holy See to the Council of Europe in Strasbourg . Then, in 1992, he was consecrated bishop and appointed as Archbishop and Apostolic Pro-Nuncio to Nigeria by Pope John Paul II. At the close of his mission to Nigeria, he was assigned to the Secretariat of State as delegate for Pontifical Representations, making him the personnel chief for the Roman curia in addition to Vatican diplomats. He served in this role until he was appointed Secretary General of the Vatican City Governatorate in 2009.

In 2011, Viganò complained directly to Pope Benedict XVI of corruption in Vatican finances. The unauthorized publication of two of his letters led to the Vatican leaks scandal. As a result, he was then transferred, in 2011, to the position of Apostolic Nuncio to the United States over his objections. In 2018, Viganò published an 11-page letter accusing Pope Francis and numerous other senior Church leaders of concealing allegations of sexual misconduct against then-cardinal Theodore McCarrick. Viganò stated that Pope Benedict XVI imposed sanctions on McCarrick, in response to accusations that were made against him, but that Pope Francis refused to enforce them and that Francis gave McCarrick an important papal advisor role. Viganò called on Francis to resign. After the publication of the letter, Viganò continued to issue public statements. On Saturday, March 14th, 2020, on the subject of the Coronavirus pandemic, Archbishop Viganò wrote:

“What we are witnessing in these hours is dramatic — certainly throughout Italy, but in a tragically exemplary way, in Rome, the heart of Catholicism. The scenario is all the more disconcerting as what is at stake is not only public health but the salvation of souls — and for some time now we, as Pastors, have stopped inflaming the hearts of our faithful with the desire for eternal salvation. We have thus deprived them of those supernatural gifts which make us capable of facing trials here below, even the assaults of death, with the power of Faith and that spark of inexhaustible and unshakable hope which comes to us from our yearning for the destiny of glory for which we were created.

“The statements of the Italian Episcopal Conference, those of the Cardinal Vicar of Rome, as well as the surreal and spectral images that have come to us from the Vatican, are many expressions of the darkening of the Faith that has struck the heights of the Church. The Ministers of the Sun, as St. Catherine of Siena was fond of calling them, have caused the eclipse, and delivered the flock to clouds of thick darkness (cf. Ezechiel 34:12).

“Regarding the measures of the Italian Episcopal Conference: when those issued by the State were still limited only to at risk areas, to certain activities and at precise times of day, the Italian Episcopal Conference had already cancelled the totality of public liturgical celebrations in all the churches of the territory, helping to fuel fear and panic and depriving the faithful of the indispensable comfort of the sacraments. It is difficult not to think that such a measure was suggested to the president of the Italian Episcopal Conference by the one [Francis] who, protected by the Leonine Walls, has been dreaming for seven years now of an outgoing, rugged, field hospital Church, which does not hesitate to embrace everyone and to get dirty.

“The Church, in order to serve the common good and the State, must never give up being herself, nor fail in her mission to proclaim Christ, our only Lord and Savior. She must in no way abdicate the Authority that comes to her from the Sovereign of the kings of the Earth, Our Lord Jesus Christ. The ecclesial events of these hours have manifested clearly — if there was still any need — the tragic subjection of the Church to a State that is striving and doing all it can to destroy the Christian identity of our Italy, by enslaving it to an ideological, immoral, globalist, Malthusian, abortionist, migrant agenda that is the enemy of man and of the family. The goal of this agenda is the destruction of the Church, and certainly not the good of our country.”

+ Archbishop Carlo Maria Viganò

Article 2
POPULATION CONTROL IN CHINA

Population Control in China
China has the highest population in the world, encompassing 1.2 billion or 21% (one fifth) of the world’s population. China faces serious social and economic problems associated with overpopulation in the years to come. Overly populated regions lead to degradation of land and resources, pollution, and detrimental living conditions. The Chinese government has tried to find a solution to the problem of increasing population with moderate success.

► CHINA’S POPULATION CONTROL POLICY. The Chinese government has used several methods to control population growth. In 1979, China started the “one child per family policy”. This policy stated that citizens must obtain a birth certificate before the birth of their children. The citizens would be offered special benefits if they agreed to have only one child. Citizens who did have more than one child would either be taxed an amount up to fifty percent of their income, or punished by loss of employment or other benefits. Furthermore, unplanned pregnancies or pregnancies without the proper authorization would need to be terminated. In 1980, the birth-quota system was established to monitor population growth. Under this system, the government set target goals for each region. Local officials were mainly held responsible for making sure that population growth totals did not exceed target goals. If target goals were not met, the local officials were punished by law or by loss of privileges.

► OTHER POPULATION CONTROL METHODS. Other methods that have been used by the Chinese government to restrict rising population totals include birth control programs and economic changes. In the early 1980s, sterilization target goals were set and made mandatory for people who had two children. At its peak in 1983, tubal ligations, vasectomies, and abortions amounted to 35% of the total birth control methods. In addition, the economy changed from primarily one of agriculture to industry. The government used this to its advantage; spreading the view that economic growth would hinder population growth.

Problems associated with population policies. There have been many problems associated with the policies and programs established by Chinese officials. First of all, these programs have been difficult to implement and have had little success. Local officials in charge of growth totals, have falsified reports in order to avoid punishment. Consequently, this has led to underreporting of the number of births by as much as 27% in 1992. Moreover, compliance with the birth-quota system has been low. Of the 14,808 infants born between 1980-1988, only about half have been with a legal birth permit. Of those born with a permit, 88% were first children born into families. Furthermore, out of the second children born, only 11% were authorized. Lastly, people of rural communities, who depend on having larger families to help with the farms, have succeeded in finding ways around the birth-quota system.

The bottom line is this―it is clearly known that the Communist Chinese government has no qualms about either preventing life, or terminating life. It has no qualms about inflicting punishment on the ‘wrongdoers’. The Chinese Communist Party came to power in China in 1949, after a long and bloody civil war between Communists and Nationalists. There is a general consensus among historians that, after Mao Zedong (Mao Tse Tung) seized power, his policies and political purges, directly or indirectly, caused the deaths of tens of millions of people. Based on the Soviets Communist experience, Mao considered violence to be necessary in order to achieve an ideal society that would be derived from Marxism and, as a result, he planned and executed violence on a grand scale. The Communist regime in China has killed more than 65 million of its own people, brutalized Tibet, and which operates concentration camps today holding close to 2 million people for ‘re-education’. Today, Communist China still operates its political prisons, called laogai, and it has built numerous concentration camps that imprison Muslims and other religious people for so-called reeducation. It is a softer totalitarianism than under Mao but it is still brutal.

Likewise, the Communist Chinese government has never had any qualms about persecuting Christians and has persecuted religious believers for decades―putting many of them to death, and imprisoning and torturing countless others. Nothing has essentially changed to this day―apart from the fact that religion is allowed―or rather minimally tolerated and maximally ‘handcuffed’―in present day Communist China.

In October 2019, a lawyer for the China Tribunal, Hamid Sabi, testified before the United Nations Human Rights Council about Communist China’s harvesting of body organs from prisoners and from people considered political enemies. Forced harvesting of organs has been occurring “for years throughout China on a significant scale ... and continues today,” he said. Many of the victims are followers of the Falun Gong spiritual movement and Uighur Muslims, said the lawyer. “Victim for victim and death for death, cutting out the hearts and other organs from living, blameless, harmless, peaceable people constitutes one of the worst mass atrocities of this century,” Sabi said. “Organ transplantation to save life is a scientific and social triumph. But killing the donor is criminal.”

A similar story of mass killings―for political or anti-religious purposes―can be told about Communist Russia. In the 2007 revision of his book, The Great Terror, Robert Conquest estimates that even though the exact numbers will never be certain, one can be certain that the Communist leaders of the Soviet Union were responsible for at least 15 million deaths. Some historians attempt to make separate estimates for different periods of Soviet history, with casualty estimates varying widely from 6 million for the Stalinist period to 8.1 million (a period ending in 1937), to 20 million to 61 million for the period 1917-1987.

Christian Control Methods?
Wuhan, the sprawling capital of Central China’s Hubei province. Hebei Province has the largest Catholic Christian population in China, with 1 million Church members according to the local government. Generally, Catholic institutions are dominant in North and Central regions of China. The number of Catholics is hard to estimate because of the large number of Christians who do not affiliate with either of the two state-approved denominations.

The 2010 Blue Book of Religions, produced by the Institute of World Religions at the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, a research institution directly under the State Council, estimates Catholics in China to number about 5.7 million. This Chinese government estimate only includes members of the Chinese Catholic Patriotic Association (CPA). It does not include un-baptized persons attending Christian groups, non-adult children of Christian believers or other persons under age 18, and unregistered Christian groups.

The Holy Spirit Study Centre in Hong Kong, which monitors the number of Chinese Catholic members, estimated in 2012 that there were 12 million Catholics in both branches of the Catholic Church. The Chinese Patriotic Catholic Church had a membership of 6 million people as of 2012.

The Pew Center estimates in 2011 there are nine million Catholics on the mainland, 5.7 million of whom are affiliated with the CPA. The Chinese Patriotic Catholic Association, abbreviated CPA, CPCA or CCPA, is an organization established in 1957 by the People’s Republic of China’s Religious Affairs Bureau to supervise mainland China’s Catholics. In his encyclical, Ad Apostolorum Principis, of July 29th, 1958, Pope Pius XII deplored the attitude and activities of the Association and declared the bishops who participated in consecrating new bishops selected by the Association to be excommunicated. Pope Benedict XVI referred to the agents of the Association as people who, though not ordained priests and sometimes not baptized, “control and take decisions concerning important ecclesial questions, including the appointment of bishops.” The organization is overseen by the United Front Work Department of the Communist Party of China following the State Administration for Religious Affairs’ absorption into the United Front Work Department in 2018.

It is the only organizational body of Catholics in China officially recognized by the government of the People’s Republic of China, but is not recognized by the Vatican. Nonetheless, the Holy See distinguishes between the Church in China and the CPCA as such, and since the 1980s has recognized nearly all CPCA-appointed bishops as legitimate and in full communion with the Catholic Church, albeit on an individual basis.

In 2010, the Pew Forum, on Religion & Public Life, estimated over 67 million Christians in China, of which 35 million “independent” Protestants, 23 million Three-Self Protestants, 9 million Catholics and 20,000 Orthodox Christians.
The name “Three-Self Protestants” comes from the three principles of self-governance, self-support (i.e., financial independence from foreigners), and self-propagation (i.e., indigenous missionary work).

According to a survey published in 2017, 79.2% of the population of Wuhan are either irreligious or practice worship of gods and ancestors; among these 0.9% are Taoists. Among other religious doctrines, 14.7% of the population adheres to Buddhism, 2.9% to Protestantism, 0.3% to Catholicism and 1.6% to Islam, and 1.6% of the population adheres to unspecified other religions.

When you look at the above charts on where this man-made, humanly-engineered virus originated (at the heart of Chinese Christianity) and see how it has spread (throughout the major Chinese Christian regions) then you have to wonder. Is it, as some media articles have suggested, a sly Communist tactic at reducing their own population in order to strengthen their economy in the long-run, even though the economy will suffer in the short term? Or is it part of a wider tactic at reducing world population? Several media outlets are claiming that the Coronavirus is not an end in itself, but merely a means to an end―whereby the massive fear being generated about it would lead to the world accepting mass worldwide compulsory vaccinations that would claim to “protect mankind from a fatal pandemic!” ― while punishing or even imprisoning those who would refuse for their anti-humanitarian and reckless attitude. Others add that the so-called “chip” or “human-chip” is now so small, that it can be added to a vaccine―and thus “digitally brand or label” every human being, and opening a can of worms with regard to nefarious consequences that this would bring.

Article 3
DELIBERATE WORLD POPULATION REDUCTION

Reducing the World Population to around 500 million
You can also look at the Ten Commandments of the New World Order, engraved on the strangest monument in America. On one of the highest hilltops in Elbert County, Georgia, stands a huge granite monument. Five massive slabs of polished granite rise out of the earth in a star pattern. The rocks are each 16 feet tall, with four of them weighing more than 20 tons apiece. Together they support a 25,000-pound capstone. Four ancient languages are engraved on the capstone, including Babylonian Cuneiform, Sanskrit, Egyptian Hieroglyphics, and Classical Greek. Engraved in eight different languages on the four giant stones that support the common capstone are ten guides, or commandments. That monument is alternately referred to as The Georgia Guidestones or the American Stonehenge. Though relatively unknown to most people, it is an important link to the Occult Hierarchy that dominates the world in which we live. Some might think that sounds excessive―Occult Hierarchy that dominates the world―but do not forget that Our Lord said that Satan was the "prince of this world"―Satan rules and uses this world for his nefarious ends.

The origin of that strange monument, unveiled in March 1980, is shrouded in mystery because no one knows the true identity of the man or men who commissioned its construction. All that is known for certain is that in June 1979, a well-dressed, articulate stranger visited the office of the Elberton Granite Finishing Company and announced that he wanted to build an edifice to transmit a message to mankind. He identified himself as R. C. Christian but it soon became apparent that was not his real name. He said that he represented a group of men who wanted to offer direction to humanity.

The Georgia Guidestones
There is also a highly intricate astrological significance to the Georgia Guidestones, which make it that much more ominous. There are precise notches that parallel the movement of the sun, from its solstices to its equinoxes, while its outer core marks the lunar-year cycle. There is even a stargazing hole, which locates the North Star, Polaris. And lastly, during the noon hour, the sun is positioned right at the center of the capstone, a highly symbolic occult design to say the least.

A message consisting of a set of ten guidelines or principles is engraved on the Georgia Guidestones in eight different languages, one language on each face of the four large upright stones. Moving clockwise around the structure from due north, these languages are: English, Spanish, Swahili, Hindi, Hebrew, Arabic, Chinese, and Russian. They read as follows:

1. Maintain humanity under 500,000,000 in perpetual balance with nature (which means 13 out of 14 people must die)..
2. Guide reproduction wisely – improving fitness and diversity.
3. Unite humanity with a living new language.
4. Rule passion – faith – tradition – and all things with tempered reason.
5. Protect people and nations with fair laws and just courts.
6. Let all nations rule internally resolving external disputes in a world court.
7. Avoid petty laws and useless officials.
8. Balance personal rights with social duties.
9. Prize truth – beauty – love – seeking harmony with the infinite.
10. Be not a cancer on the earth – Leave room for nature.

No mention of God anywhere! Not surprisingly a tablet not too far from the monument reads, “Let these be guidestones to an Age of Reason”. The Age of Reason was a book written by Thomas Paine, a prominent 18th century Freemason. Its intent was to destroy the Judeo-Christian beliefs upon which the American Republic was founded.

Article 4
GOD'S VACCINE & THE VIRUS OF SIN

God’s “Vaccine” is Needed!
Excuse me, but GOD PROTECTS SOCIETY! Man merely destroys society through his sins! The words of Our Lady of Good Success come to mind, where she speaks of the REAL vaccinations that ALWAYS work: “Woe to the world should it lack monasteries and convents! Men do not comprehend their importance, for, if they understood, they would do all in their power to multiply them, because in them can be found the remedy for all physical and moral evils... No one on the face of the Earth is aware whence comes the salvation of souls, the conversion of great sinners, the end of great scourges, the fertility of the land, THE END OF PESTILENCE and wars, and the harmony between nations. All this is due to the prayers that rise up from monasteries and convents!” (Our Lady of Good Success).

“Oh that is merely private revelation! I refuse to believe that!” you will say. Well, in that case, look at the evidence within the Bible―which says the very same thing!

“If you walk in My precepts, and keep My commandments, and do them, then I will give you rain in due seasons. And the ground shall bring forth its increase, and the trees shall be filled with fruit. The threshing of your harvest shall reach unto the vintage, and the vintage shall reach unto the sowing time: and you shall eat your bread to the full, and dwell in your land without fear. I will give peace in your coasts: you shall sleep, and there shall be none to make you afraid. I will take away evil beasts: and the sword shall not pass through your quarters. You shall pursue your enemies, and they shall fall before you. Five of yours shall pursue a hundred others, and a hundred of you ten thousand: your enemies shall fall before you by the sword. I will look on you, and make you increase: you shall be multiplied, and I will establish My covenant with you. You shall eat the oldest of the old store, and, new coming on, you shall cast away the old. I will set My tabernacle in the midst of you, and My soul shall not cast you off. I will walk among you, and will be your God, and you shall be My people. But if you will not hear Me, nor do all My commandments, if you despise My laws, and contemn My judgments so as not to do those things which are appointed by Me, and to make void My covenant, then …” (Leviticus 26:3-14) … then, for not “paying the price”, God says:

“I will quickly visit you with poverty, and burning heat, which shall waste your eyes, and consume your lives. You shall sow your seed in vain, which shall be devoured by your enemies. I will set My face against you, and you shall fall down before your enemies, and shall be made subject to them that hate you, you shall flee when no man pursueth you. I will break the pride of your stubbornness, and I will make to you the Heaven above as iron, and the Earth as brass! Your labor shall be spent in vain, the ground shall not bring forth her increase, nor the trees yield their fruit. I will bring seven times more plagues upon you for your sins! And I will send in upon you the beasts of the held, to destroy you and your cattle, and make you few in number, and that your highways may be desolate. And I will bring in upon you the sword that shall avenge My covenant. And when you shall flee into the cities, I WILL SEND THE PESTILENCE IN THE MIDST OF YOU, and you shall be delivered into the hands of your enemies! I will destroy and break your idols. You shall fall among the ruins of your idols, and My soul shall abhor you. I will bring your cities to be a wilderness, and I will make your sanctuaries desolate, and will receive no more your sweet odors. And I will destroy your land, and your enemies shall be astonished at it, when they shall be the inhabitants thereof. And I will scatter you among the Gentiles, and I will draw out the sword after you, and your land shall be desert, and your cities destroyed. You shall perish among the Gentiles, and an enemy’s land shall consume you. And if of them also some remain, they shall pine away in their iniquities, in the land of their enemies, and they shall be afflicted for the sins of their fathers, and their own―until they confess their iniquities and the iniquities of their ancestors, whereby they have transgressed Me, and walked contrary unto Me. Therefore I also will walk them, and bring them into their enemies’ land until their uncircumcised mind be ashamed: then shall they pray for their sins!” (Leviticus 26:16-41).

Coming back to that ridiculed Private Revelation again, Our Lady of La Salette also speaks of plagues as a chastisement for sin: “Every type of vice will enter, calling down in turn every type of chastisement, such as PLAGUES, famines, internal fighting and external disputes with other nations, and apostasy, the cause of the perdition of so many souls so dear to Jesus Christ and to me … The Earth will be struck by calamities of all kinds―in addition to PLAGUES AND FAMINE WHICH WILL BE WIDESPREAD.”

The Virus of Sin―the Most Fatal of All Viruses
On the other hand, what is the ultimate cause of disease and death? Sin! “The wages of sin is death!” (Romans 6:23). “The sting of death is sin” (1 Corinthians 15:56). “Sin hath reigned to death!” (Romans 5:21). “Sin, when it is completed, begetteth death!” (James 1:15) (Romans 5:21). “By one man sin entered into this world [like a virus―the virus of Original Sin], and, by sin, death; and so death passed upon all men, in whom all have sinned!” (Romans 5:12). “From the woman came the beginning of sin, and by her we all die!” (Ecclesiasticus 25:33). “Everyone shall die for his own sin!” (Deuteronomy 24:16). “Every man shall die for his own sin!” (2 Paralipomenon 25:4). “If the just man shall turn away from his justice, and shall commit iniquity … he shall die in his sin!” (Ezechiel 3:20). “The soul that sinneth, the same shall die … [and repeated later] … The soul that sinneth, the same shall die … If the just man turn himself away from his justice, and do iniquity according to all the abominations which the wicked man works, shall he live? All his justices which he hath done, shall not be remembered: in the prevarication, by which he hath prevaricated, and in his sin, which he hath committed, in them he shall die!” (Ezechiel 18:4 & 20 & 24).

When mankind sinned less, then people lived much longer lives. Here is the “Top-Ten” chart for longevity in the Old Testament, before God decided to shorten man’s life because of sin.

1. Mathusala (Methuselah) – 969 years old. See Genesis 5:21-27.
2. Jared – 962 years old. See Genesis 5:18-21
3. Noe (Noah) – 950 years old. See Genesis chapters 5 to 10.
4. Adam – 930 years old. See Genesis 1; Genesis 2:4 to 3:24; Genesis 4; and Genesis 5
5. Seth – 912 years old. See Genesis 4; Genesis 5; 1 Paralipomenon (Chronicles) 1:1 -3.
6. Cainan (Kenan) – 910 years old. See Genesis 5:9-14.
7. Enos – 905 years old. See Genesis 4:26; Genesis 5:6-11.
8. Malaleel (Mahalalel) – 895 years old. See Genesis 5:12-17.
9. Lamech – 777 years old. See Genesis Chapter 5.
10. Henoch (Enoch) – 365 years old. See Genesis 5:18-24.

It was after Noe’s time, due to the wickedness of the world, that God shortened man’s lifespan and told Noe to build the ark in preparation for the universal punishment for sin that was to come―the Great Flood (God’s virus): “And after that men began to be multiplied upon the Earth, and daughters were born to them. And God, seeing that the wickedness of men was great on the Earth, and that all the thought of their heart was bent upon evil at all times, said: ‘My spirit shall not remain in man for ever, and his days shall be a hundred and twenty years!’ It repented him that he had made man on the earth. And He said: ‘I will destroy man, whom I have created, from the face of the Earth, from man even to beasts, from the creeping thing even to the fowls of the air―for it repenteth Me that I have made them!’” (Genesis 6:1-7).

Article 5
INJECTED WITH THE VACCINE OF FEAR

The “Fear-Virus” is More Dangerous than Coronavirus
It has long been an universally accepted principle that you can rule through fear. If there is no fear―then you can create a fear (a false fear, a fake fear) and then offer your own created solution to remove that fear. Let’s say you are in the pharmaceutical business and want to make money. A healthy world will drive your business into bankruptcy. A sick world will make you rich. It is in your best interests to operate in a sick world and to keep it relatively sick, so that they will always be afraid of sickness and will always buy your products to remove the fear of those sicknesses. Sick, huh?

We’ve been down this road before with SARS, MERS (Middle East Respiratory Syndrome), the swine flu, Ebola, etc. Many scientists said that a good number of these were man-made, laboratory made, diseases―which the mainstream (money-men owned) media quickly “poopooed” as “conspiracy theory” opinions. These diseases cause fear through their threat to life―so people, like a child in fear, go running to mommy or daddy for help. “Big Pharma” is the big mommy and “Governments” are the big daddy. What do they tell us? They tell us their own version of mommy’s:
“Aw, you poor thing! Here! Let mommy kiss it better!”―except that in this case, “kiss it better” means the “kiss of the needle”, in other words, vaccination. The modern cure-all is rapidly becoming vaccination. Here are just a few typical trumpet-blowing quotes from “Big Pharma” and Government agencies:

“Vaccination: the cornerstone of an efficient healthcare system!” … “Vaccines are one of the greatest successes in public health history! CDC (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention) ensures the continued success of US vaccines by ensuring safety!” … “Vaccination is a way to “teach” the immune system how to recognize and eliminate an organism. Vaccinations are an important form of primary prevention! That means they can protect people from getting sick. Vaccinations have allowed us to control diseases that once threatened many lives! It’s important that as many people as possible get vaccinated. Vaccinations don’t just protect individuals. When enough people are vaccinated, it helps protect society!”

Injected with the Vaccine of Fear
We’ve all been sold on fearing germs and disease, but the idea that diseases are good for you is scientifically sound. Many Febrile Infectious Childhood Diseases (FICD’s) are found to give a child protection from more serious adult diseases like diabetes, asthma, allergies, and cancers. We are meant to process these germs and, through them, prime and mature our immune systems. If a disease is found to be, in fact, beneficial to the development and maturation of human immune systems, then any prevention of the disease through the use of vaccination cannot be thought of as being “effective.”

The most commonly used flu shots ‘protect’ no more than 60% of people who receive them. In some years, effectiveness plunges to as low as 10% ― a 1 in 10 chance of help. Given that a bad flu season can kill 50,000 people in the United States alone, “10% to 60% protection is better than nothing,” claims Michael Osterholm, an epidemiologist at the University of Minnesota in Minneapolis. “But it's a terribly inadequate vaccine for a serious public health threat! It's much more complicated than we thought,” Osterholm says, "I know less about influenza today than I did 10 years ago.”

Examine the evidence for yourself. Vaccines contributed little to the eradication of diseases like smallpox, tetanus or polio. Ask yourself which vaccine it was that eradicated scarlet fever or the plague. There were no vaccines yet and they waned just the same. Medicine was quick to cry victory over diseases like smallpox, tetanus and polio―but they were all well on their way out when vaccines were introduced. One could just as easily take credit for dropping the ocean’s receding tide by bailing buckets of water out it. History demonstrates that it was improvements in hygiene, sanitation, nutrition, clean water and a nutritious food supply that lead to the decline of most infectious diseases.

Just think seriously and logically for a moment―and put aside the “fear” with which you have been “vaccinated” or “injected” with by the media (and their higher-up owners). When God created mankind, the world and all that is in it―do you think that God’s all-knowing mind and all-powerful capabilities FAILED to see all the countless possible illnesses and diseases that could ever occur―either naturally or by the evil experimentations of evil men? Of course not! God is God―and by that it means that, due to His infinite perfections, nothing escapes His attention and nothing is beyond His capabilities: “No word shall be impossible with God!” (Luke 1:37)) … “The things that are impossible with men, are possible with God!” (Luke 18:27).

Universal Vaccination Program of the World Health Organization
Worldwide vaccination is the goal of the enemies of God. Why? It is because vaccination opens up a “hornet’s nest”, a “can of worms” or a “Pandora’s Box” of evil. There are many nefarious advantages and avenues that are opened up if you can achieve worldwide vaccination of every human being who enters this world. Here is a quote from a pro-World Health Organization Universal Vaccination Program supporter and advocate:

“In 2017, the number of children immunized ― 116.2 million ― was the highest ever reported. The Region of the Americas achieved maternal and neo-natal tetanus elimination, leaving only 15 countries yet to achieve elimination. Since 2010, 113 countries have introduced new vaccines, and more than 20 million additional children have been vaccinated. The Global Vaccine Action Plan set ambitious goals, and it remains the case that most targets will not be met by the end of the Decade of Vaccines in 2020. One of the five goals of the Global Vaccine Action Plan is to develop and introduce new and improved vaccines and technologies. Progress towards a universal flu vaccine has been more challenging, although a variety of vaccine candidates are in early stages of clinical evaluation. One in five children in the world are still not fully protected by even the most basic vaccines. About 22 million are at risk of contracting preventable diseases because they are under-vaccinated. This allows 1.5 million children to die every year from diseases that can be prevented by vaccination coverage.”

What a blatant hypocrisy! What a nerve! They talk about seeking to prevent 1.5 million children dying every year from diseases that can be prevented by vaccinations―yet they do not prevent the diseases of “contraception” and “abortion.” Abortion alone kills 56 million children each year! These hypocrites seek to pass laws that enforce universal vaccination―but these same people will not seek to pass laws that prohibit contraception and abortion! The vast majority of the world has been “vaccinated” or “injected” with the virus of acceptance of contraception and abortion―and that is a pandemic that is causing the death of most souls in the world, and leading to their eternal damnation. The sad part is that most Catholics have succumbed to and accepted this noxious vaccine.

Article 6
TIME FLEW BY ... DEATH FLEW BY ... DEATH BY FLU

Time Flew By―Flu Over Time
An influenza pandemic is an epidemic of an influenza virus that spreads on a worldwide scale and infects a large proportion of the world population. In contrast to the regular seasonal epidemics of influenza, these pandemics occur irregularly – there have been about nine influenza pandemics during the last 300 years. Pandemics can cause high levels of mortality, with the 1918 Spanish flu pandemic being the worst in recorded history; this pandemic was estimated to be responsible for the deaths of approximately 50–100 million people. There have been about three influenza pandemics in each century for the last 300 years. Some pandemics are relatively minor such as the one in 1957 called “Asian Flu” (with around 1 to 4 million dead, depending on source).

► REGULAR SEASONAL FLU―Seasonal flu kills 291,000 to 646,000 people worldwide each year. Seasonal flu kills 291,000 to 646,000 people worldwide each year, according to a new estimate that's higher than the previous one of 250,000 to 500,000 deaths a year. Seasonal influenza kills an estimated 36,000 to 56,000 people in the United States each year. Those figures from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and other groups were published on December 13th, 2017 in The Lancet medical journal. The updated numbers, which do not include deaths during flu pandemics, are based on more recent data from a larger and more diverse group of countries than the previous estimate, the CDC said. During the 2017–2018 season, overall in the USA, there were 959,000 hospitalizations and 79,400 deaths attributed to influenza, according to the CDC.

The data came from 33 countries that have 57 percent of the world's population and had seasonal flu numbers for a minimum of four years between 1999 and 2015. That information was used to create an estimate of flu-related respiratory deaths in 185 countries worldwide. The study found that the risk of flu-related death was highest in the poorest regions of the world and among older adults. “These findings remind us of the seriousness of flu and that flu prevention should really be a global priority,” study co-author Dr. Joe Bresee, associate director for global health in CDC's Influenza Division, said in a CDC news release. Solution? Vaccinations.

► SPANISH FLU ― The 1918 influenza pandemic (from January 1918 to December 1920) was an unusually deadly influenza pandemic, the first of the two pandemics involving H1N1 influenza virus, with the second being the swine flu 90 years later, in 2009. The Spanish Flu infected 500 million people around the world, or about 27% of the then world population of between 1.8 and 1.9 billion. The World Health Organization estimates that 2–3% of those who were infected died―that approximately 30 million were killed by the flu, or about 1.7% of the world population died (around 1 in 60 people). Other estimates range from 17 to 55 million deaths. The most common estimates put the death toll at around 40 million to 50 million (thus, around 1 in 10 of infected persons), and possibly as high as 100 million (1 in 5 infected persons), making it one of the deadliest epidemics in human history. The viral infection was no more aggressive than previous influenza strains. The problem was that malnutrition, overcrowded medical camps and hospitals, and poor hygiene promoted bacterial super-infection. St. Jacinta Marto and St. Francisco Marto―two of the three seers of Our Lady’s 1917 Fatima apparitions―were also victims of the Spanish flu.

► ASIAN FLU ― A pandemic of influenza A (H2N2) in 1957-58. A respiratory illness, which usually results in a high fever, body aches or chills, a dry cough, sore throat, and difficulty breathing. First identified in China in late February 1957, the Asian flu spread to the United States by June 1957 where it caused about 70,000 deaths. In the UK, by early 1958, it was estimated that over 9 million people in Great Britain had caught the Asian flu during the 1957 epidemic. Of these, more than 5.5 million were attended by their doctors. About 14,000 people died of the immediate effects of their attack. Pneumonia and bronchitis accounted for 50% of these.

► SARS CORONAVIRUS (SARS-CoV) ― virus identified in 2003. The disease appeared in November 2002 in the Guangdong province of southern China. An epidemic of SARS affected 26 countries and resulted in more than 8000 cases in 2003. Transmission of SARS-CoV is primarily from person to person. Symptoms are influenza-like and include fever, malaise, myalgia, headache, diarrhea, and shivering . No individual symptom or cluster of symptoms has proved to be specific for a diagnosis of SARS. Cough (initially dry), shortness of breath, and diarrhea are present in the first and/or second week of illness. Severe cases often evolve rapidly, progressing to respiratory distress and requiring intensive care. Since 2003, a small number of cases have occurred as a result of laboratory accidents. Experimental vaccines are under development.

► SWINE FLU ― The swine flu was initially seen in Mexico (2nd largest Catholic population in the world) in April 2009, where the strain of the particular virus was a mixture from 3 types of strains. It is called “swine flu” because six of the genes are very similar to the H1N2 influenza virus that was found in pigs around 2000. It is estimated that in the 2009 flu pandemic, 11–21% of the then global population (of about 6.8 billion), or around 700 million to 1.4 billion people, contracted the illness — more in absolute terms than the Spanish flu pandemic. However, with about 150,000–575,000 fatalities (1 in every 2,000 to 1 in 4,700), it thus had a much lower case fatality rate than the Spanish flu pandemic of 1919. In August 2010, the World Health Organization declared the swine flu pandemic officially over.

► EBOLA ― Ebola virus disease (EVD), also known as Ebola haemorrhagic fever (EHF) or simply Ebola, is a viral haemorrhagic fever of humans and other primates caused by Ebola viruses. The disease was first identified in 1976, in two simultaneous outbreaks: one in Nzara (a town in South Sudan) and the other in Yambuku (Democratic Republic of the Congo―the 9th largest Catholic population in the world), a village near the Ebola River from which the disease takes its name. EVD outbreaks occur intermittently in tropical regions of sub-Saharan Africa. Between 1976 and 2013, the World Health Organization reports 24 outbreaks involving 2,387 cases with 1,590 deaths. The largest outbreak to date was the epidemic in West Africa, which occurred from December 2013, to January 2016, with cases and deaths. It was declared no longer an emergency in March 2016. Other outbreaks in Africa began in the Democratic Republic of the Congo in May 2017, and 2018. In July 2019, the World Health Organization declared the Congo Ebola outbreak a world health emergency.

Signs and symptoms typically start between two days and three weeks after contracting the virus with a fever, sore throat, muscular pain, and headaches. Vomiting, diarrhea and rash usually follow, along with decreased function of the liver and kidneys. At this time, some people begin to bleed both internally and externally. The disease has a high risk of death, killing 25% to 90% of those infected, with an average of about 50%. The virus spreads through direct contact with body fluids, such as blood, semen or breast milk from infected humans. Spread may also occur from contact with items recently contaminated with bodily fluids.

► CHINESE FLU ― An H7N9 virus was first reported to have infected humans in March 2013, in China. H7N9 is a bird flu strain of the species Influenza virus A (avian influenza virus or bird flu virus). Cases continued to be reported throughout April and then dropped to only a few cases during the summer months. At the closing of the year, 144 cases had been reported of which 46 had died. It is known that influenza tends to strike during the winter months, and the second wave, which began in October, was fanned by a surge in poultry production timed for Chinese New Year feasts that began at the end of January. January 2014 brought a spike in reports of illness with 96 confirmed reports of disease and 19 deaths. As of April, 2014, the outbreak's overall total was 419, and the unofficial number of deaths was 127. A 5th epidemic of the H7N9 virus began in October 2016 in China. The epidemic is the largest since the first epidemic in 2013 and accounts for about one-third of human cases ever reported. The cumulative total of laboratory-confirmed cases since the first epidemic is 1,223. About 40% have died.

► MERS (Middle East Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus (MERS-CoV) ― Most MERS patients developed severe respiratory illness with symptoms of fever, cough and shortness of breath. About 3 or 4 out of every 10 patients reported with MERS have died. MERS-CoV spread from ill people to others through close contact, such as caring for or living with an infected person. Health officials first reported the disease in Saudi Arabia in September 2012. Through retrospective (backward-looking) investigations, they later identified that the first known cases of MERS occurred in Jordan in April 2012. As of July 2015, MERS-CoV cases have been reported in over 21 countries, including Saudi Arabia, Jordan, Qatar, Egypt, the United Arab Emirates, Kuwait, Turkey, Oman, Algeria, Bangladesh, Indonesia (none were confirmed), Austria, the United Kingdom, South Korea, the United States, Mainland China, Thailand, and the Philippines. MERS-CoV is one of several viruses identified by WHO as a likely cause of a future epidemic.

Article 7
THE EFFECTIVENESS OF VACCINES

How Effective Are Flue Vaccinations?
Quoting “straight from the horse’s mouth” ― the CDC (United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention), they say that: “While vaccine effectiveness can vary, recent studies show that flu vaccination reduces the risk of flu illness by between 40% and 60% among the overall population during seasons when most circulating flu viruses are well-matched to the flu vaccine. How well the flu vaccine works (or its ability to prevent flu illness) can vary from season to season. The vaccine’s effectiveness also can vary depending on who is being vaccinated.

“At least two factors play an important role in determining the likelihood that flu vaccine will protect a person from flu illness: (1) characteristics of the person being vaccinated (such as their age and health), and (2) the similarity or “match” between the flu viruses the flu vaccine is designed to protect against and the flu viruses spreading in the community. During years when the flu vaccine is not well matched to circulating influenza viruses, it is possible that little or no benefit from flu vaccination may be observed. During years when there is a good match between the flu vaccine and circulating viruses, it is possible to measure substantial benefits from flu vaccination in terms of preventing flu illness and complications.

“However, even during years when the flu vaccine match is good, the benefits of flu vaccination will vary, depending on various factors like the characteristics of the person being vaccinated, what influenza viruses are circulating that season and even, potentially, which type of flu vaccine was used. Flu vaccines do NOT protect against infection and illness caused by other viruses that also can cause flu-like symptoms. There are many other viruses besides flu viruses that can result in flu-like illness (also known as influenza-like illness) that spread during the flu season. These non-flu viruses include rhinovirus (one cause of the “common cold”) and respiratory syncytial virus (RSV), which is the most common cause of severe respiratory illness in young children, and a major cause of severe respiratory illness in adults aged 65 years and older. Protection against influenza type A flu viruses has been less consistent. On average, flu vaccines have reduced the risk of doctor visits with type A flu by 24% and reduced the risk of hospitalization with type A flu by 33% in adults age 65 and older.” (CDC ― the United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, https://www.cdc.gov/flu/vaccines-work/vaccineeffect.htm).

WebMD reports: “The flu vaccine doesn't work equally well in all people. It’s most effective in healthy adults. After middle age, immunity naturally becomes weaker. The flu vaccine won’t work as well as it once did. Vaccines work by spurring the immune system into action. So the effectiveness of a vaccine depends on how vigorously the immune system responds to it. If you have a weak immune system to begin with, a vaccine may just not work as well. Many chronic illnesses can weaken a body’s defenses. Unfortunately, getting the flu vaccine isn’t a guarantee that you won’t get the flu, but it is thought to provide at least partial immunity. If you catch the flu despite getting the vaccine, your symptoms may be milder.”

CNN (Cable News Network) reported that “The [flu] shot's success varies based on your age, the CDC noted. Among children up to 17, its overall effectiveness against flu was 61%, while just 24% of adults 50 and older who received the shot gained protection against infection. Dr. William Schaffner, medical director of the nonprofit National Foundation for Infectious Diseases, said that those who get flu after receiving vaccine are less likely to require hospitalization and are less likely to die of the illness. ‘The vaccine is not perfect,’ Schaffner said. ‘But give the vaccine credit for softening the blow.’”

All that they are saying about the flu vaccine can also be said of God’s “vaccines” which come in form of healthy, natural, organic nutrition. If you disagree with that, then you are saying that man can do better than God, or that man can do what God cannot do. The chief problem is that people have been so dumbed-down that they no longer know what foods contain what minerals and natural chemicals―they just at food for its taste and not for its medicinal properties. Very few people take note of what the ancient Greek Philosopher Hippocrates, the founder of western medicine, said about food and health: “Let food be thy medicine, and let medicine be thy food.” The power of food to heal and restore remains, but the message has become distorted, confused, messy and therefore ineffective to a greater or lesser degree―depending on how much we know or do not know about the medicinal and healing properties that God has put into food.

The US National Library of Medicine National Institutes of Health, in a January 2004 article entitled: “Let Food Be Thy Medicine” states: “…quoting Hippocrates: ‘Let food be thy medicine and medicine be thy food’ [says] Although many patients are convinced of the importance of food in both causing and relieving their problems, many doctors’ knowledge of nutrition is rudimentary. Most feel much more comfortable with drugs than foods, and the ‘food as medicine’ philosophy of Hippocrates has been largely neglected … The question of fortifying foods inevitably becomes highly political, and the politics of nutrition are just as complex as the science ... The United States government—lobbied by food manufacturers—is trying to undermine a report by the World Health Organization on «Diet, Nutrition, and the Prevention of Chronic Disease».”

Jailed for Opposing Vaccination?
A February 2019, Newsweek article stated: Russian propaganda may be responsible for the persistence of measles as conspiracy theories about vaccinations spread across the Internet. A 2018 report by the American Public Health Association, titled “Weaponized Health Communication: Twitter Bots and Russian Trolls Amplify the Vaccine Debate,” came to a similar conclusion. “Whereas bots that spread malware and unsolicited content disseminated anti-vaccine messages, Russian trolls promoted discord. Accounts masquerading as legitimate users create false equivalency, eroding public consensus on vaccination,” the report said. “Health-related misconceptions, misinformation, and disinformation spread over social media, posing a threat to public health. Despite significant potential to enable dissemination of factual information, social media are frequently abused to spread harmful health content, including unverified and erroneous information about vaccines,” it continued. “This potentially reduces vaccine uptake rates and increases the risks of global pandemics, especially among the most vulnerable.” “Vaccination is one of the most cost-effective ways of avoiding disease—it currently prevents 2-3 million deaths a year, and a further 1.5 million could be avoided if global coverage of vaccinations improved,” a World Health Organization report reads. (Newsweek, February 14th, 2019).

The New York Times, in an article entitled “Facebook Announces Plan to Curb Vaccine Misinformation” on March 7th, 2019, reported: Facebook announced Thursday its first policy to combat misinformation about vaccines, following in the footsteps of Pinterest and YouTube. The social network is adopting an approach similar to the one it uses to tackle fake news: The company will not remove incorrect content, but it will aim to reduce the reach of that content by making it harder to find. “Leading global health organizations, such as the World Health Organization and the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, have publicly identified verifiable vaccine hoaxes,” Monika Bickert, Facebook’s vice president for global policy management, said in a statement Thursday. “If these vaccine hoaxes appear on Facebook, we will take action against them.” (The New York Times, March 7th, 2019).

All of this is very true―for nowadays, you can barely find anything that points out the dangers of vaccinations on the major search engines (such as Google), instead your search results bombard you with a whole host of propaganda in favor of vaccinations, and a demonization of anti-vaccination supporters and their arguments against vaccination. In the UK, in February of 2020, it was reported that posting anti-vaccine propaganda on social media could become a criminal offence in the UK ― even if those promoting it, believe the pseudoscience, said the UK’s new criminal Law Commissioner. Don’t be surprised if the USA follows the same policy and makes it a crime to speak out against vaccination.

At the moment, in the USA, all 50 states have legislation requiring obligatory specified vaccines for students. Although exemptions vary from state to state, all school immunization laws grant exemptions to children for medical reasons. There are 45 states and Washington D.C. that grant religious exemptions for people who have religious objections to immunizations. Currently, 15 states allow philosophical exemptions for those who object to immunizations because of personal, moral or other beliefs.

Religious exemption indicates that there is a provision in the statute that allows parents to exempt their children from vaccination if it contradicts their sincere religious beliefs.

Philosophical exemption indicates that the statutory language does not restrict the exemption to purely religious or spiritual beliefs. For example, Maine allows restrictions based on “moral, philosophical or other personal beliefs,” and Minnesota allows objections based on “conscientiously held beliefs of the parent or guardian.”

New York recently became the fifth state ― after California, Maine, Mississippi and West Virginia ― to enact a law requiring children in public school to be vaccinated, unless they have a valid medical reason. Legislatures in several other states are considering similar legislation. Most states (44), however, allow children to be exempt from vaccinations due to religious concerns, according to a Pew Research Center analysis. And one state, Minnesota, allows for a broader exemption based on personal beliefs, but does not explicitly mention religion. Among the states that specifically allow religious exemptions to vaccinations, 15 also allow exemptions for any type of non-religious personal belief, according to Pew Research Center’s analysis.

Supporters of ending all exemptions from vaccination, except for medical exemptions, argue that vaccines are safe and that allowing children to go unvaccinated puts many people at risk for measles, rubella and other diseases. Opponents say the laws infringe on parental rights, as well as religious and other personal liberties.

Article 8
TIME FOR PANIC OR TIME FOR PERSPECTIVE?

Panic or Perspective?
Sowing fear and panic is one of the most popular tools of the enemies of God. Just as you have good bacteria and bad bacteria―there is also good fear and bad fear. God creates fear―the enemies of God (Satan and the world) also create fear. Before proceeding further, here is what God, or Holy Scripture, has to say about fear―actually, you could do no better than copying, pasting and printing-out the following words of Holy Scripture and using them as a daily prayer in these troubled times:

“An intolerable fear and dread fell upon them, and their minds were troubled exceedingly” (Judith 14:17). “And that was a day of darkness and danger, of tribulation and distress, and great fear upon the Earth!” (Esther 11:8). “Men withering away for fear and expectation of what shall come upon the whole world” (Luke 21:26). “There was the fear of death in every city, and the hand of God was exceeding heavy … and the cry of every city went up to Heaven! … If you fear the Lord, serve Him, and hearken to His voice, and provoke not the Lord! … Fear the Lord your God, and He shall deliver you!” (1 Kings 5:12; 12:14; 4 Kings 17:39). “The fear of the Lord is a fountain of life―to decline from the ruin of death” (Proverbs 14:27). “Keep His fear and grow old therein!” (Ecclesiasticus 2:6). “In the fear of the Lord is confidence of strength, and there shall be hope for His children” (Proverbs 14:26). “Blessed are they that fear the Lord―that walk in His ways” (Psalm 127:1). “They that fear the Lord, hath hoped in the Lord―He is their helper and their protector” (Psalm 113:19). “The just man shall not fear the evil hearing. His heart is ready to hope in the Lord” (Psalm 111:7). “They [the worldly] have not called upon the Lord! There have they trembled for fear, where there was no fear!” (Psalm 13:5). “The unjust hath said within himself that he would sin―there is no fear of God before his eyes!” (Psalms 35:2). “We shall have many good things if we fear God, and depart from all sin, and do that which is good!” (Tobias 4:23). “His salvation is near to them that fear Him!” (Psalm 84:10). “As a father hath compassion on his children―so hath the Lord compassion on them that fear Him!” (Psalm 102:13). “He will do the will of them that fear Him―He will hear their prayer, and save them!” (Psalms 144:19).

“He that dwelleth in the aid of the most High, shall abide under the protection of the God … He will overshadow thee with His shoulders: and under His wings thou shalt trust ... Thou shalt not be afraid of the terror of the night ... A thousand shall fall at thy side, and ten thousand at thy right hand―but it shall not come near thee! … Thou shalt consider with thy eyes and shalt see the reward of the wicked! … No evil shall come to thee: nor shall the scourge come near thy dwelling … For He hath given His angels charge over thee―to keep thee in all thy ways! ...He hoped in Me, I will deliver him! I will protect him because he hath known My Name. He shall cry to Me, and I will hear him! I am with him in tribulation! I will fill him with length of days!” (Psalm 90:1-16). “The Lord is my light and my salvation, whom shall I fear? The Lord is the protector of my life―of whom shall I be afraid? Whilst the wicked draw near against me, to eat my flesh … my heart shall not fear! … For He hath hidden me in His tabernacle! In the day of evils, He hath protected me in the secret place of His tabernacle!” (Psalm 26:1-5). “In God I have put my trust―I will not fear what flesh can do against me! … In God have I hoped―I will not fear what man can do to me!” (Psalm 55:5, 11). “Our God is our refuge and strength―a helper in troubles, which have found us exceedingly. Therefore we will not fear when the Earth shall be troubled!” (Psalm 45:2-3).

“Fear not, Abram, I am thy protector!” (Genesis 15:1). “I am the God of Abraham thy father! Do not fear, for I am with thee!” (Genesis 26:24). “Be not afraid of sudden fear, nor of the power of the wicked falling upon thee!” (Proverbs 3:25). “If thou sleep―thou shalt not fear! Thou shalt rest and thy sleep shall be sweet!” (Proverbs 3:24). “He that shall hear Me, shall rest without terror, and shall enjoy abundance, without fear of evils!” (Proverbs 1:33). “Fear the Lord thy God, because I am the Lord” (Leviticus 19:14). “The Lord spoke to me, saying: ‘Call together the people unto Me, that they may hear My words, and may learn to fear Me all the time that they live on the Earth, and may teach their children! … [that they may] fear Me, and keep all My commandments at all times, that it may be well with them and with their children! … Fear the Lord thy God, and keep all His commandments and precepts, all the days of thy life, that thy days may be prolonged! … Do manfully and be of good heart! Fear not, nor be ye dismayed ― for the Lord thy God, He Himself is thy leader and will not leave thee, nor forsake thee! … He Himself will be with thee! He will not leave thee, nor forsake thee! Fear not, neither be dismayed!” (Deuteronomy 4:10; 5:29; 6:2; 31:6-8). “Serve ye the Lord with fear and rejoice unto Him with trembling!” (Psalm 2:11). “The eyes of the Lord are upon them that fear Him, He is their powerful protector, and strong stay―a defense from the heat and a shelter from the sun at noon” (Ecclesiasticus 34:19). “The angel of the Lord shall encamp round about them that fear Him and shall deliver them!” (Psalm 33:8).

So What Is Happening Where?

► WORLDWIDE: As of March 7th, 2020, the number of cases worldwide passed 105,893, officials say, resulting in 3,567 (which translates to a death rate of 1 in 30 persons, or 3.4%).

● Of those 105,893 (100%) reported cases, a total of 62,192 are closed cases (which 58% of the 105,893 reported cases) and these have already had an outcome― either positive by being healed, or negative through death.

● Of those 62,192 (100%) closed cases, a total of 58,625 (94% of all closed cases) have recovered their health and 3,567 (6% of all closed cases) have died.

● Of the currently 43,701 active cases where patients are still under observation, there are 37,467 (86% of current active cases) who are in a mild condition of illness, while 6,234 (14% of all current active cases) are in a serious or critical condition of illness.

● Therefore, of all closed cases―where patients have recover or died―the current averages show that out of 100 people, 94 live and 6 die (which si a death rate of 1 in 16, or 6%).

● In all currently active cases―where patients are still sick and under observation―the current averages show that out of 100 people, 86 have mild symptoms and 14 have serious symptoms.

News About Flu Flew By
Typical flu symptoms include fever, sore throat, aches, chills and sweats and fatigue, according to the Mayo Clinic. While the flu might seem relatively minor because it's so common, complications from the flu, which can include pneumonia, bronchitis, asthma flare-ups and heart problems, can be deadly. People with weakened immune systems, adults older than age 65 and babies are all at a higher risk of contracting the flu.

According to CDC, this year’s flu season has led to at least 10 million USA medical visits and 210,000 USA hospitalizations. The data also shows that between 14,000 and 30,000 flu-related USA deaths have occurred from October 1st, 2019, to February 1st, 2020.

This flu season has been especially bad for children, according to CDC. So far this season―as of February 21st, 2020―there have been 105 influenza-associated deaths have been reported in children and adolescents younger than 18 -- the highest number of deaths at this point in the season since reporting began during the 2004-2005 season, the CDC said.

“There is a deadly respiratory virus that is circulating throughout the United States, and it is at its peak. It is not novel coronavirus,” said Dr. Pritish Tosh, an infectious disease specialist with the Mayo Clinic, in Rochester, Minnesota.

Coronavirus dominates news coverage, yet flu is deadlier. Despite how bad this flu season has been, the flu isn’t getting nearly as much public attention as the new coronavirus that originated in China, even though flu presents a much bigger risk to Americans.

William Schaffner, a professor of preventive medicine and health policy at Vanderbilt University Medical Center, said, “When we think about the relative danger of this new coronavirus and influenza, there’s just no comparison. Coronavirus will be a blip on the horizon in comparison. The risk is trivial.”

Nora Colburn, an infectious disease specialist at Ohio State University’s Wexner Medical Center, said: “If you didn’t travel specifically to Wuhan, China, or have contact with a person with suspected or known coronavirus, your chance of contacting this is extremely low” (CDC Weekly U.S. Influenza Surveillance Report, 2/1; CDC “Flu View,” accessed 2/10).

Despite enduring two waves of viruses during the 2019-2020 flu season, new estimates from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention indicate that the vaccine is relatively good match for this year’s flu strains.

While we won’t have exact figures until after the flu season is over, the 2019-2020 vaccine is estimated to be only 45% effective overall and 55% effective in children. In comparison, the 2018-2019 effectiveness of man-made flu vaccine was even worse, estimated at being roughly 29% effective.

In view of those discouraging numbers, it has to be said that this season’s flu has been particularly hard on children, with 13 children dying in just one week in mid-February, and 105 children having died since the beginning of flu season, according to CDC estimates released February 21st, 2020. During recent flu seasons, deaths among children have ranged from 37 to 187.

THE FOLLOWING CHART SHOWS NUMBERS AS OF MARCH 7TH 2020
Other charts will follow at either weekly or two-weekly intervals to keep you updated

Article 9
WHAT THE "SANE" SCIENTISTS ARE SAYING

Warming Warning―Warm-Up for Health!
It is amazing how spirits rise when the sun arises! Looking on the “sunny side” of things― “Your Father, Who is in Heaven, who maketh His sun to rise upon the good, and bad” (Matthew 5:45)―Hong Kong University pathology professor, Dr. John Nicholls, said that he suspected three factors would potentially kill the virus, according to the transcript of a private conference call in early February.

Nicholls said, in remarks that were leaked on social media: “Three things the virus does not like: (1) Sunlight, (2) High Temperature, and (3) Humidity. The virus can remain intact at 4 degrees Celsius (39 degrees Fahrenheit) or 10 degrees Celsius (50 degrees Fahrenheit) ... But at 30 degrees Celsius (86 degrees Fahrenheit) then you get inactivation.”

The CDC (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention) has cautioned that not enough is known about the virus to say for sure that weather will affect the spread, but a spokesperson said, “I’m happy to hope that it [the threat] goes down as the weather warms up.”

Dr. Joel Myers said that upon analysis, the intensity and amount of hours of sunshine, along with heat and humidity, have negatively impacted past viruses. “Until we see how the virus reacts, to sunlight, heat, and humidity increases over the next few months, we will not know for sure,” Myers said. With the approach of the March equinox, a stronger sun and increased hours of sunshine in the Northern Hemisphere may take a toll on the virus if it keeps to the trend. If the virus does hold true to the trend, it will most likely peak sometime in the next 60 days before falling to the warmer weather. Myers estimates that the chance that the virus differs from the trend to be less than 5%. With the arrival of springtime, answers on the Coronavirus will most likely follow. Warmer weather could stall the rate of the outbreaks, giving researchers enough time to find a vaccine before colder weather rolls around once more, Myers said.

Sane and Sage Scientific Statements
BACKGROUND BIOGRAPHY OF DR. JOHN NICHOLLS
Professor John Nicholls is a Clinical Professor in Pathology at the University of Hong Kong. He commenced medical studies at the University of Adelaide, South Australia in 1977 and graduated in 1983. He commenced postgraduate training in pathology at the Institute of Medical and Veterinary Sciences, the Queen Elizabeth Hospital and The Adelaide Children’s Hospital. In 1988 he moved to Hong Kong as a Lecturer in Pathology at the University of Hong Kong where in addition to clinical and teaching duties commenced research into the relationship of viruses with the respiratory tract. His publications were focused on the role of Epstein-Barr Virus in nasopharyngeal carcinoma, a common tumour in the Guangdong region.

In 1997, following the first outbreak of H5N1 influenza in humans, he commenced collaboration with the Department of Microbiology to study the pathological effects of avian influenza viruses in the respiratory tract. In 2003 he was a key member of the research team at the University of Hong Kong which isolated and characterized the novel SARS coronavirus which was associated with the global outbreak of 2003.

His work on SARS and avian influenza has been published in prestigious journals such as Lancet, PLOS Medicine and Nature Medicine as listed in part of his selected biography. His current investigative work is looking at the viral binding sites in the respiratory tract and determining susceptibility to avian influenza in humans and other animals. Together with staff from the School of Public Health he has established a lung and bronchial ex vivo culture system to investigate tropism and pathogenesis of emerging viral infections, as well as potential novel antiviral agents such as DAS181 in these systems. In 2009 he was awarded a Croucher Senior Medical Fellowship to work on novel therapeutic strategies for influenza.

THE CLSA CONFERENCE CALL WITH DR. JOHN NICHOLS
Overnight in Asia, we hosted a call with professor John Nicholls a clinical professor in pathology at the University of Hong Kong and expert on coronaviruses. He was a key member of the research team at the University of Hong Kong which isolated and characterized the novel SARS coronavirus in 2003. He’s been studying coronaviruses for 25 years (full bio here). The recording of the call can be found on our website. Below are my notes transcribing the call. The first 30m are worth listening to.

QUICK SUMMARY: look at the fatality rate outside of Wuhan ― it’s below 1%. The correct comparison is not SARS (Severe acute respiratory syndrome) or MERS (Middle East Respiratory Syndrome), but a bad cold, which kills people who already have other health issues. This virus will burn itself out in May when temperatures rise. Wash your hands.

Here are the notes transcribed by one of the CLSA conference call participants:

CLSA Question and Answer Session with Professor Nicholls

► QUESTION: What is the actual scale of the outbreak? How much larger is it compared to the official “confirmed” cases?

DR. JOHN NICHOLLS REPLIES: People are saying a 2.2 to 2.4% fatality rate total. However recent information is very worthy - if you look at the cases outside of China the mortality rate is less than 1%. [Only 2 fatalities outside of mainland China]. There are two potential reasons: (1) either China’s healthcare isn’t as good ― that’s probably not the case; or (2) What is probably right is that, just as with SARS (Severe acute respiratory syndrome), there are probably much stricter guidelines in mainland China for a case to be considered positive. So the 20,000 cases in China would probably mean only the severe cases; the folks that actually went to the hospital and got tested. The Chinese healthcare system is very overwhelmed with all the tests going through. So my thinking is this is actually not as severe a disease as is being suggested. The fatality rate is probably only 0.8% to 1%. There’s a vast underreporting of cases in China. Compared to SARS (Severe acute respiratory syndrome) and MERS (Middle East Respiratory Syndrome) (Middle East Respiratory Syndrome) we are talking about a coronavirus that has a mortality rate of 8 to 10 times less deadly to SARS to MERS. So a correct comparison is not SARS or MERS but a severe cold. Basically this is a severe form of the cold.

► QUESTION: You mentioned a shortage of testing kit can you talk more about that?

DR. JOHN NICHOLLS REPLIES: Because this is a new virus, there is no short, rapid test that can be done. There are two ways to detect a virus. (1) Through the genetic material ― DNA or RNA or (2) to detect the protein of the virus. The rapid tests used in a doctors’ labs look at the protein. The problem with that is that you need an antibody to pick it up. And it takes 8-12 weeks to make commercial antibodies. So right now for the diagnostics tests they are using PCR [Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) tests are used to detect HIV’s genetic material, called RNA], which give you a turnaround in 1 to 2 hours. But then you need to run a machine and run 96 runs in 1 hour―but then you have batch samples, so there’s another delay of 5-6 hours for patient presentation. So that will lead to some problems you can’t turnaround in 5 to 10 minutes, which is what you want when a patient shows up to the emergency room. Because right now you also have influenza going around―so what you want is to be able to rule out influenza―so you can treat the patients correctly for coronavirus. So that may be why they missed some of the earlier cases.

► QUESTION: Your colleague, at Hong Kong University, estimated that the size of the infected population on January 25th was 75,000 with a doubling time of 6.4 days. So by February 1st, 2020, we would have 150,000 infected. How accurate do you think these models are and how accurate have they been in the past?

DR. JOHN NICHOLLS REPLIES: Those figures did not take into account restriction on travel, quarantine etc… These reports are likely on the high side. This is not taking into account social distancing. Historically these models have not been all that accurate.

► QUESTION: When do you think this thing will peak?

DR. JOHN NICHOLLS REPLIES: Three things the virus does not like (1) sunlight (2) high temperatures and (3) humidity. To make you guys really worried―a coronavirus can survive on a stainless steel surface for 36 hours. It hangs around for quite a bit.

Sunlight will cut the virus ability to grow in half so the half-life will be 2.5 minutes and in the dark it’s about 13 minutes to 20 minutes. Sunlight is really good at killing viruses. That’s why I believe that Australia and the southern hemisphere will not see any great infections rates, because they have lots of sunlight and they are in the middle of summer. And Wuhan and Beijing is still cold―which is why there are high infection rates.

In regards to temperature, the virus can remain intact at 4 degrees Celsius (39 degrees Fahrenheit) or 10 degrees Celsius (50 Fahrenheit) for a longer period of time. But at 30 degrees Celsius (86 degrees Fahrenheit) then you get inactivation. And high humidity the virus doesn’t like it either. That’s why I think SARS (Severe acute respiratory syndrome) stopped around May and June in 2003 ― that’s when there’s more sunlight and more humidity. The environment is a crucial factor. The environment will be unfavorable for growth around May. The evidence is to look at the common cold ― it’s always during winter. So the natural environment will not be favorable in Asia in about May.

The second factor is that of personal contact. With SARS (Severe acute respiratory syndrome) once it was discovered that the virus was spread through the fecal oral route there was much less emphasis on the masks and far more emphasis on disinfection and washing hands. Hong Kong has far more cleanliness (than China) and they are very aware of social hygiene. And other countries will be more aware of the social hygiene (than China). So in those countries you should see less outbreaks and spreading. A couple days ago, the fecal-oral route of transmission was confirmed in Shenzhen. In China, most of the latrines are open ― there’s more chance of disease being spread. But in other countries the sanitations systems tends to be closed. My personal view is that this will be a bad cold and it will all be over by May.

People talk about the vaccine and this is the big problem that people get from movies. Where in the movie they come out with a vaccine and then three days later it’s all over the world and everybody is saved. In reality this does not happen because for a vaccine you need to go through clinical trials ― is it safe and will it work. The last thing you want to do is rush a vaccine too early. If you get any severe reactions, then the anti-vaxxer will just say: “I told you so!” You are talking about a working vaccine in 1 to 2 years. With SARS (Severe acute respiratory syndrome), in 6 months the virus was all gone and it pretty much never came back. SARS pretty much found a sweet spot of the perfect environment to develop and hasn’t come back. So no pharmaceutical company will spend millions and millions to develop a vaccine for something which may never come back. It’s Hollywood to think that vaccines will save the world. The social conditions are what will control the virus ― the cleaning of hands, isolating sick people, etc…

► QUESTION: What do we know about the transmission rate? It’s been estimated around 2.2 to 2.68. What percent of the patients are transmitting while being asymptomatic?

DR. JOHN NICHOLLS REPLIES: This is a big problem when you talk about asymptomatic that means you have a good diagnostic test- where you can say they are asymptomatic (which we don’t have with this virus).

We actually looked at this with MERS (Middle East Respiratory Syndrome) where people were saying it had a high fatality. We went to Camel abattoirs and took serums from the abattoir workers and found that quite a few had low infections with no symptoms. This is what should have been done at the initial stages at the seafood market. But to do that you need a good diagnostic test. A good diagnostic test is necessary to determine to the transmission rate. Now we have normal human airways and we can now look at how long it takes the virus to replicate in that environment. And that will be very useful to determine those who are asymptomatic carriers.

► QUESTION: Any sense of whether the estimates of the reproductive number the Ro of 2.5 or 2.7. Do you think that is high or low. What does that mean?

DR. JOHN NICHOLLS REPLIES: Measles was about 10 to 15 and influenza is just below 2. I think it’s about 2.2 ― as it’s being transmitted within the community.

► QUESTION: Have we seen any super spreaders? We saw that with SARS (Severe acute respiratory syndrome) and MERS (Middle East Respiratory Syndrome).

DR. JOHN NICHOLLS REPLIES: There’s talk about that but the epidemiologists are still overwhelmed so no clear answer. But I don’t think there are any super spreaders.

► QUESTION: What is the percentage of people transmitting the virus while being asymptomatic?

DR. JOHN NICHOLLS REPLIES: Unlike SARS (Severe acute respiratory syndrome), patients were symptomatic at about day 5, some of these cases may be asymptomatic until about day 7. That’s based on the first publications. Asymptomatic is probably the first 5 days.

► QUESTION: There’s a paper published looking a familial cluster with a boy who was shedding the virus and he was asymptomatic.

DR. JOHN NICHOLLS REPLIES: That’s something about kids and we saw this with SARS (Severe acute respiratory syndrome). Very few kids had very severe disease. We are trying to determine if this is a virus which we call low (unintelligible) kind of inducer or high (unintelligible word used) kind of inducer. SARS is high [unintelligible] kind of inducer. This means that when it infects the lower part of the lung, the body develops a very severe reaction against it and leads to lots of inflation and scarring. In SARS what we found is that after the first 10 to 15 days it wasn’t the virus killing the patients it was the body’s reaction.

We are doing testing on this now. Is this virus in the MERS (Middle East Respiratory Syndrome) or SARS (Severe acute respiratory syndrome) kind picture or is this the other type of virus which is a milder coronavirus like the NL63 or the 229. I think this will be a mild (unintelligible word used) kind inducer.

► QUESTION: Case fatality is about 2.5% or so? Do you expect this to change over time? And are you seeing any difference among the young population and older population in terms or mortality rate?

DR. JOHN NICHOLLS REPLIES: SARS (Severe acute respiratory syndrome) went really for people in their 30 or 50 years. And MERS (Middle East Respiratory Syndrome) on the other hand basically is if you have co-morbidity ― try and find somebody in the Middle-East, who does not smoke or does not have high blood pressure etc... The data coming out of China seems to indicate that it’s those with the co-morbidity are most at risk. For the seasonal influenza that’s also what we find. It’s the people with the co-morbidity that have the increase mortality rate. Having said that there’s a guy in the Philippines who died in his mid-30.

I think this looks more like the seasonal influenza where those who die have to co-morbidity. Now that we have better case control definitions outside of mainland China, we will get a true assessment of the fatality rate. I would now put it at about 0.8% to 1%. When you look at all the death reports ― separate out the deaths from mainland China and outside China.

► QUESTION: Mortality rate in China is much higher? Why?

DR. JOHN NICHOLLS REPLIES: It is related to the environment. In the high income countries you don’t have as high a population density, higher level of environment control and hygiene. In Indonesia ― it’s unlikely to spread much as it’s very hot and humid. Would this virus move to Africa? I think that’s unlikely ― too hot there’s not a lot of travel there. Europe ― possibility higher transmission but environmental care is higher.

At this stage it’s a really bad cold which can cause problems in people. People are talking about the “lethal virus” but seasonal influenza can cause deaths in elderly but we don’t call that “the lethal influenza”

► QUESTION: There’s news reports that antivirals are being used and that it’s working what are your thoughts on that?

DR. JOHN NICHOLLS REPLIES: With SARS (Severe acute respiratory syndrome) it didn’t seem to work at all with the commercially available antivirals. But there seems to be good effects with the case in Washington with the Gilead agent. And it sounds like China will be using it.

Interferon works and it has quite a bit of benefit.

The problem with the antivirals ― because the virus has different ways of replicating within the cell, finding a nice common target has been difficult. But the Gilead agent appears to me to be very promising. We now have the virus growing in our labs/cultures so can now test it to see what will work and not work.

► QUESTION: Would the opening of the hospitals in China change anything?

DR. JOHN NICHOLLS REPLIES: What we found with SARS (Severe acute respiratory syndrome) in Hong Kong was that a contributing factor to the spread was the overwhelming of the Hong Kong healthcare system. Hospitals and doctors were overwhelmed. When China built these Wuhan hospitals ― it’s to take the work load off the staff which is likely exhausted.

In Hong Kong with SARS (Severe acute respiratory syndrome) we found quite a lot of infection of healthcare workers as they are close and doing invasive procedures. But this time around there is not much evidence of the healthcare workers getting sick or dying (but maybe China is not reporting it) so this may suggest that I think it is not being spread by close aerosol contact but more by the fecal-oral route or with droplets. So it will not be as contagious within hospitals. So getting the two hospitals built it will take a lot of the work load off the other hospitals so it should be a big benefit.

► QUESTION: The recovery rate now higher than the deaths rate? Thoughts on that?

DR. JOHN NICHOLLS REPLIES: What we found is that in Hong Kong with SARS (Severe acute respiratory syndrome) we didn’t know how long to treat a patient for. Now in China they are using the SARS model but treating patients for shorter time periods so that they don’t get the secondary problems that they did with SARS. Getting actual data on recovery from the mainland is still a bit of a challenge.

I’d consider a patient recovered if he’s been discharged. The problem is that with SARS (Severe acute respiratory syndrome), there were quite a bit of people where the steroid were very beneficial to treat the acute stage and we didn’t know how long the virus would live for so we kept them on the steroids for a long period of time and they came out with all sorts of secondary problems due to the immune-suppression.

I haven’t seen any data on the quality of life of those who have been discharged.

► QUESTION: Evidence of E-coli?

DR. JOHN NICHOLLS REPLIES: Secondary infections are most likely the cause of deaths of the patients in the Philippines and Hong Kong.

► QUESTION: What does it mean for a patient to have recovered?

DR. JOHN NICHOLLS REPLIES: That means the patient has been discharged from the hospital. That’s the criteria for Hong Kong. But there’s no good data or guidelines on this.

► QUESTION: What is the probability that this will be contained and eradicated or will it be endemic in the human population?

DR. JOHN NICHOLLS REPLIES: If it is like SARS (Severe acute respiratory syndrome) it will not be endemic. It most likely will be a hit and run just like SARS. People talk about mutation but what we found with SARS was that there was no mutation and we have been tracking MERS (Middle East Respiratory Syndrome) and we have not seen any severe mutation. This is unlike the common coronavirus which when they replicate they don’t have a ”spell check” so they mutate. So if this virus follows the same path as SARS or MERS it won’t mutate. This will not be endemic. I think it will burn itself out in about 6 months.

► QUESTION: Does mortality rate or fatality rate typically increase over time? That was apparently the case with SARS (Severe acute respiratory syndrome)?

DR. JOHN NICHOLLS REPLIES: With SARS (Severe acute respiratory syndrome) we didn’t know how long the virus was alive for. So with SARS in the later stages people were not dying of SARS but of the complications of SARS which is why the mortality rate increased. But now people are much more aware of the dangers of over immune-suppression. So the death rate shouldn’t be more severe. Especially with the new hospitals being established which should take some of the workload off of the healthcare workers from Wuhan.

If we look at the serious cases being reported it’s about 13% of the total cases being reported. If we assume a 50% mortality rate for the severe cases than we are looking at a mortality rate of 5 to 6%. Is that a fair assumption?
In Hubei, the milder cases are not making it to the hospital. Because they are so overwhelmed that milder cases are being sent away. So that’s why it’s important not to look at the mortality rate in Wuhan but to look at the mortality rate in Shanghai or Shenzhen or outside of Wuhan. It’s very important to dissect it out.

► QUESTION: Would it be too early to make conclusion outside of Wuhan? It’s still really early days outside of Wuhan? Are we making assumption with very little data and very early data?

DR. JOHN NICHOLLS REPLIES: That’s all the data we have to work with. When you are dealing with an epidemic at the early stages ― there’s such a variable. But now for political reason people are far more aware of the virus so it won’t be as epidemic as it was early on. There’s far more awareness and controlled environment and changes in social behavior. Which I’m not sure is taken into account in the models. So it should spread far less outside of Wuhan.

THE SOUTH CHINA MORNING POST INTERVIEW WITH DR. JOHN NICHOLS
Speaking with the South China Morning Post, Dr. Nicholls shared some insights from his current research into the new Coronavirus that is causing so much concern worldwide.

● Asked if he thought a vaccine was close to being made available. Dr. Nicholls replied: “Definitely not! Because, unlike television, where people have a vaccine [made] and then two days later it’s going out to the whole world―[in reality] vaccine production takes a much longer period of time. You have to make sure it works. You have to make sure it is safe. Then you have make sure it does not have any side-effects. That sort of thing can take years―not just days or months. I think people should not be mislead by Hollywood and these sorts of things.”

● Asked if a vaccine would be of any use to those already infected by the virus, Dr. Nicholls replied: “Definitely not! The vaccine is only good for the prevention of NORMAL people from getting infected. So, even when there was the Swine Flu outbreak in 2009, by the time a vaccine was available, already half the population had been exposed―so I think the reality is that you will not be able to get any vaccine available, until this current outbreak has been completed.”

● Asked what sort of treatment options offer the best hopes for those who have already been infected, Dr. Nicholls replied: “Well, what has been tried right now, are antivirals which have been used for HIV and some of the hepatitis viruses―which have been able to stop the virus from replicating―but the problem is that there are many different types of viruses and not respond equally to antiviral therapy. The other treatment is one which is called “interferon” [see definition below] which is able to dampen down the immune response to the virus. Both of these have been tried. Also, because we have the ability to use the cells and tissues―which we are growing in culture―to see whether or not any other agents can be useful.”

[Interferons are a group of signaling proteins made and released by host cells in response to the presence of several viruses. In a typical scenario, a virus-infected cell will release interferons causing nearby cells to heighten their anti-viral defenses].

● Asked what his main concerns were, Dr. Nichols replied: “My main concern is on the access of information that is going out―because there are so many people who want quick information―but it is very difficult to step right out and say what is true and what is false. This is where social media is playing both a beneficial and detrimental role. People want an answer so quickly, that the ability to fact check is probably not as rigorous as it might be if there wasn’t as much media concern [who want to publish news quickly] and public anxiety” [which demands answers immediately].

● When asked about how we can protect ourselves, Dr. Nichols, one of the world’s foremost experts on the topic, replied: “What we are looking at is to see whether this virus can both grow in the respiratory tract and in the gut―because that will have a big impact upon how we can control this virus and stopping it from spreading from person to person.” It is to be noted that he mentions nothing about common-sense preventative and protective measures―such as things that will strengthen and boost the immune system―which are the ultimate means of protection. Even vaccines cannot cure by themselves, but merely stimulate the immune system to fight disease.

● When asked how this virus differs from previous viruses, Dr. Nicholls replied: “Actually, it is not too dissimilar! It is similar to some influenza viruses that we have studied in the past―in the way in which it can grow and the sites of the body in which it can grow … What we are doing is working with normal human tissues, because we have to make sure that what we find is not just confined to laboratory test lines, but that they apply to human situation. Our findings will be very helpful to governments and organizations about how to stop this virus in order to stop this virus from spreading.”

Article 10
FIGHTING DISEASE ON A NATURAL LEVEL WITHOUT GOD

The Godless Vaccine
You have―no doubt―read much and listened a lot to all the daily news that keeps pouring forth about the Coronavirus pandemic. Heaven―no doubt―is also paying attention to the news that man keeps pouring forth with a frenzy. “The Lord hath looked down from Heaven upon the children of men, to see if there be any that understand and seek God. They are all gone aside, they are become unprofitable together! The fool hath said in his heart: ‘There is no God!’ There is no fear of God before their eyes! They are corrupt, and are become abominable in their ways―there is none that doth good, no not one. There is none that doth good―no, not one! Their throat is an open sepulcher―with their tongues they acted deceitfully; the poison of asps is under their lips! Their mouth is full of cursing and bitterness! Their feet are swift to shed blood! Destruction and unhappiness in their ways; and the way of peace they have not known!” (Psalm 13:1-3).

How sadly and disgustingly true that is! How much mention of God have you seen in print or spoken on the news in relation to the Coronavirus crisis? Next to none! Recently, President Trump announced Sunday, March 15th, 2020 as a National Day of Prayer with regard to the Coronavirus crisis―but, apart from some Church leaders on both national and local levels―there is no reference to God. As the Psalm points out―there is nobody who seeks God and God’s help in the matter. It is as if there was no God! “The fool hath said in his heart: ‘There is no God!’ There is no fear of God before their eyes! They are corrupt, and are become abominable in their ways!”

“Without Faith it is impossible to please God. For he that cometh to God, must believe that He exists and is a rewarder of them that seek Him” (Hebrews 11:6). God warns us of the consequences of our worldwide preference of “self-isolation” and “quarantining” ourselves from God: “Harden not your necks … Yield yourselves to the Lord, and come to His sanctuary … Serve the Lord the God and the wrath of His indignation shall be turned away from you!” (2 Paralipomenon 30:8). But modern man does not want to do that―“His mind was turned away from the Lord God” (3 Kings 11:9). “They forgot God, Who saved them, Who had done great things for them!” (Psalm 105:21). “They forgot His benefits, and His wonders that He had shown them” (Psalm 77:11). “They perverted their own mind and turned away their eyes that they might not look unto Heaven” (Daniel 13:9). “And they did evil in the sight of the Lord, and they forgot their God” (Judges 3:7). “In sinning and lying against the Lord, we have turned away, so that we went not after our God” (Isaias 59:13). “They forgot the Lord their God, so He delivered them into the hands of [their enemies]” (1 Kings 12:9).

It is clear that―for the most part―God is forgotten and rejected. God’s laws no longer have a place in most of human society―with legislation being diametrically opposed to God’s law. We have allowed divorce, cohabitation, contraception, abortion, same sex marriages, gender changes, Satanism, pornography, blatant immodesty and a host of other aberrations that are an abomination to God. “Be not deceived, God is not mocked! For what things a man shall sow, those also shall he reap. For he that soweth in his flesh, of the flesh, shall also reap corruption!” (Galatians 6:7-8).

The WHO (World Health Organization) says: “Vaccination is one of the most effective ways to prevent diseases. A vaccine helps the body’s immune system to recognize and fight pathogens like viruses or bacteria, which then keeps us safe from the diseases they cause. Vaccines protect against more than 25 debilitating or life-threatening diseases, including measles, polio, tetanus, diphtheria, meningitis, influenza, tetanus, typhoid and cervical cancer.”

The WHO claims that vaccination has prevented hundreds of millions of deaths, ever since 1796, when Edward Jenner inoculated a boy with cowpox to prevent smallpox―but there is clearly room for much improvement and the subject is highly controversial. Vaccines are risky or ineffective in people with compromised immune systems, they don’t even exist for several viral diseases, and flu vaccines, in particular, often fail in the elderly.

Hey! What About God’s Vaccines?―Nature!
Even the World Health Organization, in its 2002 paper on Traditional Medicines, says: “It has been noted, for instance, that traditional medicine has been more effective than modern medicine in addressing some diseases, such as certain viral diseases ― Xie, 2002, p. 127” … In China, in 1995 there were 2,371 traditional Chinese medicine hospitals and 30 traditional Chinese medicine colleges, some of which have been promoted to university level―See Xie, 2002, p. 120-123. In India, there are 2,854 traditional medicine hospitals and more than 387 colleges specializing in traditional medicine ― Chandra, 2002, p. 139.” (Protection and Promotion of Traditional Medicine ― Implications for Public Health in Developing Countries, “Introduction”, §10, §12).

Yet “Big Pharma” does not buy into that! Why? No money can be made from traditional and natural medicines! THEY CANNOT BE PATENTED and therefore they cannot be your own personal product. Traditional cures and natural medicines are, so to speak, “in the public domain.” The four “judicial exception” categories, to be used in patentability decisions, are (1) abstract ideas, (2) laws of nature, (3) natural phenomena, and (4) natural products. If your invention is a product of nature, it falls under excluded subject matter. However, if your invention does not occur naturally and can only exist through some work on your part, you may be able to get a patent. You cannot patent God’s air, God’s water, God’s plants, trees, vegetables, fruits, seeds, etc.

The bottom line is that “Big Pharma” sees God’s Nature or God’s Creation and Creatures as being a direct and unwanted competitor in “Big Pharma’s” lust for money and control. To try and drive God out of the market and destroy Him as a competitor, “Big Pharma” has to discredit God’s products as much as possible―and that it what they do! Ceaselessly! Aggressively! Shamelessly! Theirs is a constant and universal mantra against all that God has created for our benefit, well-being and health: “It is a myth lacking any scientific study and evidence that (put here anything you like ― Garlic, Water, Vitamins, Minerals, Fruits, Vegetables, Meats, Proteins, Fats, etc.) cures this or that disease” OR “This or that MIGHT have some effect on this or that disease, but there is no scientific evidence to back up these claims and the use of it MIGHT have some side effects or adverse reactions with medications.”

Listen to the God of Science!
Take, for example, the bludgeoning and battering of certain things that people might turn to in this battle against the Coronavirus. A website called “Live Science” runs an article entitled: “13 Coronavirus Myths Busted by Science” in which it says:

“Here at Live Science, we've compiled a list of the most pervasive myths about the novel coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19, the disease it causes, and explained why these rumors are misleading, or just plain wrong. Some say Vitamin C supplements will stop you from catching COVID-19. Researchers have yet to find any evidence that vitamin C supplements can render people immune to COVID-19 infection. In fact, for most people, taking extra vitamin C does not even ward off the common cold, though it may shorten the duration of a cold if you catch one. That said, vitamin C serves essential roles in the human body and supports normal immune function. As an antioxidant, the vitamin neutralizes charged particles called free radicals that can damage tissues in the body. It also helps the body synthesize hormones, build collagen and seal off vulnerable connective tissue against pathogens. So yes, vitamin C should absolutely be included in your daily diet if you want to maintain a healthy immune system. But megadosing on supplements is unlikely to lower your risk of catching COVID-19, and may at most give you a "modest" advantage against the virus, should you become infected. No evidence suggests that other so-called immune-boosting supplements — such as zinc, green tea, or echinacea — help to prevent COVID-19, either. Be wary of products being advertised as treatments or cures for the new coronavirus. Since the COVID-19 outbreak began in the United States, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) have already issued warning letters to seven companies for selling fraudulent products that promise to cure, treat or prevent the viral infection.”

Another website―Centura Health―pipes in with this one: “Myth 1: Saline, garlic and sesame oil can prevent coronavirus infection. There is "no evidence" that these products can ward off coronavirus (COVID-19) and there is no known preventive treatment for COVID-19. World Health Organization (WHO) notes that while researchers, including those in the United States, are pursuing possible vaccines against coronavirus, no vaccine is currently available. Right now, the best methods of prevention, according to CDC, are to avoid close contact with sick individuals, wash your hands frequently with soap and water for at least 20 seconds, clean and disinfect hard surfaces, and limit touching your eyes, nose, and mouth.”

Okay, so forget about a good nutritious diet that stimulate, strengthen, repair, restore and boost your immune system. Forget about getting enough sleep and enough exercise―which also will strengthen, repair, restore and boost your immune system. Forget about staying hydrated ― which also strengthens, cleanses and boosts your immune system. Forget about all these things―just keep washing those darned hands with soap and water, spray disinfectant all over the place and keep away from people!

Don’t You Just Love the Scientific Coronavirus Contradictions?
Sometimes―just as it is with Modernists and the Faith―you have to wonder if some of these scientists actually know what they are talking about, or if they can see their own blatant contradictions and, sometimes, total stupidity. Just take note of these following claims or statements by scientists:

(1) They say that there is no cure for Coronavirus (and many other diseases too)―but we know that 90% of all Coronavirus infected persons recover and are cured―those same scientists tell us that!!!!

(2) They say that they are working on making a vaccine against the virus―but they also tell us that the vaccine will not be able to cure the virus, only PERHAPS prevent infection by the virus, and which MIGHT help alleviate and lessen the symptoms of the virus and PERHAPS prevent death. Yet that is precisely what many God-made foods do with the rich concentration of all kinds of vitamins, minerals, natural chemical compounds, etc. Even if they do not cure the virus―which is debatable, for that would mean saying that God has failed to put a remedy in nature for all possible diseases―they at least can alleviate the symptoms of the disease, which is the very same thing the vaccine makers are claiming to do!

(3) They claim that all these natural products of God’s created Nature are incapable of healing, curing, preventing disease―because there is no scientific research and evidence to prove this. Yet why don’t they do such tests themselves? Do they know in advance that God’s products are impotent, useless and mere taste-bud ticklers without any medicinal properties? They will not do so, because they cannot patent God creation, they cannot patent natural things, they cannot patent traditional remedies and cures―the patent laws forbid this. So they vilify, ridicule, criticize and cast doubt on God’s products, while praising to high heaven their own man-made products. Since when could man make something better than God?

(4) They admit that the vaccine cannot kill the virus―its purpose is to stimulate your immune system so that it can successfully resist and even fight-off the virus. Yet they tell you it is pointless―due lack of scientific evidence―to take a whole variety of God’s products that also stimulate, strengthen, repair, restore and boost your immune system. If your immune system is weak or compromised, then the vaccine will not work for you―but for heaven’s sake don’t take God’s products that could strengthen, repair, restore and boost your immune system.

God Was Doing Quite Alright Without Vaccines!
Disease has been around for thousands of years―while vaccines have only been around since
“Vaccination does NOT account for the impressive declines in mortality seen in the first half of the century … Nearly 90% of the decline in infectious disease mortality among US children occurred before 1940, when few antibiotics or vaccines were available.” (Annual Summary of Vital Statistics: Trends in the Health of Americans During the 20th Century,
Journal of American Academy of Pediatrics, December 2000). In the United States (and other countries), historical records show that disease mortality declined nearly 90% before the introduction of the vaccine program and routine vaccination programs — as stated in the Trends in the Health of Americans report. In fact, some of the most prevalent diseases in the early 1900s — including Tuberculosis (TB), Scarlet Fever and Typhoid — followed the same declines WITHOUT ever having a vaccine program (in the USA). These diseases were nearly eradicated in the U.S. without the population being vaccinated for them. (See graphs) How is this possible? The pharmaceutical/medical industry has spent MILLIONS convincing us that vaccines saved us all from imminent disease death, but history proves this is more of a marketing tactic than a true fact. A marketing tactic that helps ensure the nearly $60 BILLION vaccine market keeps growing.

Pharmaceutical companies and the medical system love to vilify viruses, but are they really bad for your body? We all have dozens of different viruses in our system at one time because that is how nature keeps our immune systems stimulated. Science is discovering there are many benefits to common illnesses, particularly in childhood, and theorize that viruses actually help train the immune system in a way that can REDUCE the risk of more serious issues later in life, including cancer. Yes, you read that right: natural viruses can PROTECT from disease later in life. For thousands of years, humans have lived synergistically with viruses and bacteria. And now science is discovering that they actually serve a purpose on our journey to transformation and health.

The only diseases we are told to fear or made to fear are the ones for which a vaccine has been or will be developed and marketed―and enforced as being mandatory, or else!!!. We never feared measles and mumps in the early 20th century… the media tells us what to fear, so they can then sell you an alleged solution. There are literally THOUSANDS of diseases. Take Leprosy for instance. How many parents walk around daily concerned about their child contracting leprosy? But, it still exists – by the thousands in various parts of the world. The United States has roughly 200 cases every year. Did you know that? Probably not―because there is no vaccine for leprosy, because it hardly profitable for pharmaceutical companies to manufacture a vaccine for a disease that only 200 people get every year! It’s the epidemics and pandemics that are profitable. Pandemics are good for profits! Pick a pandemic and produce a pandemic vaccine―even if it doesn’t really work (and you don’t want it to work too well). Sick people produce healthy profits! Sick, huh?

Why Did Diseases Decline?
The 19th-century population shift from country to city that accompanied industrialization and immigration led to overcrowding in newly populated cities that lacked proper sanitation or clean water systems. These conditions resulted in repeated outbreaks of cholera, dysentery, TB, typhoid fever, influenza, yellow fever, and malaria. By 1900, however, the incidence of many of these diseases had begun to decline because of public health improvements, implementation of which continued into the 20th century.

Sanitation & Hygiene
Local, state, and federal efforts to improve sanitation and hygiene reinforced the concept of collective “public health” action (e.g. to prevent infection by providing clean drinking water). By 1900, 40 of the 45 states had established health departments. The first county health departments were established in 1908. From the 1930s through the 1950s, state and local health departments made substantial progress in disease prevention activities, including sewage disposal, water treatment, food safety, organized solid waste disposal, and public education about hygienic practices (e.g. food handling and handwashing). Chlorination and other treatments of drinking water began in the early 1900s and became widespread public health practices, further decreasing the incidence of waterborne diseases.

Tuberculosis declines WITHOUT a vaccine
The incidence of Tuberculosis (TB) also declined as improvements in housing reduced crowding and TB-control programs were initiated. In 1900, 194 of every 100,000 U.S. residents died from TB — the second leading cause of death — and most were residents of urban areas. In 1940 (before the introduction of antibiotic therapy), TB remained a leading cause of death, but the crude death rate had decreased to 46 per 100,000 persons. There was never a vaccine for Tuberculosis in the United States. Yet other countries TB rates also decreased before the TB vaccine was introduced.

Typhoid & Cholera decline WITHOUT vaccines
This report from the Center for Disease Control in the US clearly shows that the decline in disease was due to clean water systems and sanitation — NOT vaccines. This report was written before the CDC became grossly intertwined with the pharmaceutical industry. Quote from the CDC report (NOTE there was NEVER a vaccine program in the US for typhoid and cholera):

“The occurrence of diseases such as cholera and typhoid dropped dramatically. In 1900, the occurrence of typhoid fever in the United States was approximately 100 cases per 100,000 people. By 1920, it had decreased to 33.8 cases per 100,000 people. In 2006, it had decreased to 0.1 cases per 100,000 people (only 353 cases) with approximately 75% occurring among international travelers. Typhoid fever decreased rapidly in cities from Baltimore to Chicago as water disinfection and treatment was instituted. This decrease in illness is credited to the implementation of drinking water disinfection and treatment, improving the quality of source water, and improvements in sanitation and hygiene. It is because of these successes that we can celebrate over a century of public drinking water disinfection and treatment ― one of the greatest public health achievements of the 20th century.”

Article 11
CORONAVIRUS OR CONALLAVIRUS

Mountains From Molehills―Cons From Coronas
When people cease to think and replace thinking with feeling―then you have the perfect climate conditions for a pandemonium pandemic. You may be thinking: “What does the word ‘pandemonium’ mean?” Well, it is defined as wild uproar, noisy disorder or confusion; unrestrained disorder; tumult or chaos; total and utter craziness. The word “Pandæmonium” was coined in 1667, by the author and poet John Milton (1608-1674) in his 10-book poem, in “Paradise Lost” wherein he gives the name of “Pandæmonium” to the palace built in the middle of Hell―this “Pandæmonium” was “the high capital of Satan and all his peers,” and the dwelling place of all the demons. Milton coined the word “Pandæmonium” by combing the Greek word “pan” meaning “all” with the Latin word “daemonium” meaning “evil spirit” ―the Latin word originating from Greek “daimonion” meaning “inferior divine power,” and from “daimōn” meaning “lesser god” ―from which we, of course, get the English word “demon”. Thus, in a nutshell, “pandemonium” can be said to be “all demon’s place” or the “place for all demons” or, as Milton has it, “the palace of all demons.” The idea of “wild uproar, noisy disorder or confusion; unrestrained disorder; tumult or chaos; total and utter craziness” is a perfect description of Hell, which is a place of utter chaos and disorder and rebellion.

As for the word “pandemic”―a word that you have probably heard “ad nauseam” over the last three or four weeks―the word “pandemic” comes from the Latin “pandemus” and from the Greek “pandemos” meaning “pertaining to all people; public, common,” coming from “pan” meaning “all” and “dēmos” meaning “people” ― hence “all people.” The word is modeled on “epidemic” which implies a limitation to a smaller area.

It is the hyperbole of the media that has caused pandemonium among the people. Hyperbole―coming from the Latin word “hyperbole” and Greek “hyperbole” ― literally “a throwing beyond,” from “hyper” meaning “beyond” and “bole” meaning “a throwing, a casting, sending a missile, etc.” ― thus meaning “exaggeration, embellishment, extravagance, excess” as in an “obvious exaggeration in rhetoric.”

The Media Mountains Toppled By Media Molehills
Recently, certain well-established and respected newspapers have “called-out” the hyperbole or extravagant exaggeration of other media outlets concerning the Coronavirus.

► For example, The New York Times, in an article on March 16th, 2020, entitled: “Some Ask a Taboo Question: Is America Overreacting to Coronavirus?” states: “As America―desperate to stem the coronavirus outbreak―put in place sweeping restrictions last week on every facet of public life, the University of Wyoming economist, Linda Thunstrom, asked what felt like a taboo question: ‘Are we overreacting?’ … ‘We need to give the response to the virus our full attention,’ said Jennifer Nuzzo, an associate professor at Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health. ‘But we’re following every rabbit that pops out of its hole, as opposed to trying to prioritize responses that have the most impact.’” (The New York Times).

► The Washington Post, in an article on March 11th, 2020, entitled: “Inducing panic: Media under fire for driving coronavirus hype to epidemic levels”, states: “Concerns about the coronavirus pandemic are both warranted and understandable, but the media is increasingly coming under fire for stoking a panic mentality that experts decry as both counter-productive and unsupported by the facts … ‘There’s been a mad rush to go out and purchase all these items in anticipation of the next apocalypse. That’s not what we’re dealing with,’ said Dr. Robert Quigley, regional medical director of International SOS. ‘We’re dealing clearly with a pandemic for all intents and purposes, but the vast majority of us who are going to contract the disease are not going to be significantly impacted.’” (The Washington Post).

► The California Globe, in its article on March 9th, 2020, stated: “Governor Gavin Newsom has declared a state of emergency in California because of the 114 reported cases of the coronavirus in the state of 40 million residents. Was this to play into the hand of the media, which has hyped the flu virus as the next plague, particularly because every year, tens of thousands of people die of that season’s flu? … Cable news hosts wear their most dire faces while reporting on the coronavirus flu, as though the United States has never seen or dealt with an outbreak. An Associated Press article was equally dramatic and hysterical: ‘Crossing more borders, the new coronavirus hit a milestone Friday, infecting more than 100,000 people worldwide as it wove itself deeper into the daily lives of millions, infecting the powerful, the unprotected poor and vast masses in between.’ … According to the Center for Disease Control, the 2018-2019 flu season, lasting 21 weeks, was the longest in a decade; 61,200 died, 647,000 people were hospitalized. The CDC says that is on par with a typical flu season … Did Sierra College close down in 2018 when two students tested positive for the flu? No, but it closed this week for two cases of coronavirus. How about the Elk Grove School District – did it close in 2018 for one case of the flu? Nope. But that is what the school district announced over the weekend, because of one case of Coronavirus … The hype is political and more dangerous than a flu virus.” (The California Globe).

► The Guardian, in London, UK, in an article on March 6th, 2020, entitled: “Why I’m taking the coronavirus hype with a pinch of salt”, states: “Never, ever, should a government use war as a metaphor in a time of peace. Britain is not at war with coronavirus. The phrase and its cognates should be banned. Those who exploit them to heighten panic and win obedience to authority should be dismissed from public office … War is the absolute last resort of a nation facing existential collapse. It implies extreme violence. Words such as battles, fights, enemies and threats to nations are clearly directed at accreting power and suspending liberty … To promote this under the cover of any “worst-case scenario” is inexcusable … When hysteria is rife, we might try some history. In 1997 we were told that bird flu could kill millions worldwide. Thankfully, it did not. In 1999 European Union scientists warned that BSE “could kill 500,000 people”. In total, 177 Britons died of vCJD. The first SARS outbreak of 2003 was reported by as having “a 25% chance of killings tens of millions” and being “worse than Aids”. In 2006, another bout of bird flu was declared “the first pandemic of the 21st century”, the scares in 2003, 2004 and 2005 having failed to meet their body counts. Then, in 2009, pigs replaced birds. The BBC announced that swine flu “could really explode”. The chief medical officer, Liam Donaldson, declared that “65,000 could die”. He spent £560m on a Tamiflu and Relenza stockpile [drugs are thought to prevent and reduce symptoms of flu by stopping the influenza virus from spreading inside the body], which soon deteriorated. The Council of Europe’s health committee chairman described the hyping of the 2009 pandemic as “one of the great medical scandals of the century”. These scenarios could have all come to pass of course – but they represent the direr end of the scale of predictions. Should public life really be conducted on a worst-case basis? Every medical expert I have heard on the subject is reasonable and calm. Of course, I could be wrong. I could get ill. Millions could die. But it is also possible that come the spring, this crisis will have passed. So for the moment, if you see a virus story containing “might” “could” “possibly” or “worst-case scenario”, stop reading. You are being fed war talk. Let them wash your hands, but not your brain.” (The Guardian, London, UK).

THE USA CORONAVIRUS INFECTION AND DEATH RATES AS OF SATURDAY MARCH 21ST 2020
To enlarge the table and make it more easily readable, simply hold down your Control Key (Ctrl) while, at the same pressing your Plus Key (+) several times.
To return to your NORMAL VIEW, either hold down your Control Key (Ctrl) while, at the same pressing your Minus Key (--) several times. OR
Hold down your Control Key (Ctrl) while, at the same pressing your Zero Sign Key (0) once

Now look at the regular Seasonal Flu infection rates, hospitalization rates and death rates from 2010 to 2019
They are FAR MORE numerous than what the Coronavirus numbers are currently showing.
The 2017-2018 flu season of 21 weeks saw over 45 million people being infected and over 61,000 deaths in the USA.
In the 8 weeks since the first reported US case of Coronavirus on January 21st, there are now (by 12:00 am March 21st) a total of just under 2,000 US infections and 275 US deaths. That's a far cry from 45 million flu infections and 61,000 flu deaths

God-Sent or Man-Made? Holy Hit or Wholly Hoax? Providential or Political?
Just as the Coronavirus mutates―so do the opinions on the Coronavirus mutate! Is it for real―in the sense that is it totally natural, a creation of nature? Or is it man-made―in the sense of being a tool of germ warfare? Is it from God, or is it from man? The opinions and arguments are as rampant and symptomatic as the virus itself―and, like the virus, the arguments are highly contagious! In some cases, deadly!

Similarly to the Catholic Church Crisis―you have, in the Coronavirus Crisis, a bunch of ‘Traditionalists’, ‘Conservatives’, ‘Liberals’, ‘Modernists’, ‘Skeptics’ and indifferent ‘fence sitters’. Each group has their own set of beliefs. Or you could compare it to the ever-fluctuating manufactured political crisis in the country―where you have on stage the Republicans, Democrats, Independents, Socialists and whatever happens to be the latest “flavor of the day”―all with their nuanced and largely hypocritical non-godly political principles and schemes.

Far too many people―for lack of ability to discern and distinguish―want a “black or white” answer to everything. That is most certainly desirable―if and when possible. Thus Our Lord says that our speech or testimony should be a simple “Yes!” or “No!” ― “Let your speech be ‘yea, yea: no, no’―and that which is over and above these, is of evil!” (Matthew 5:37). Yet, there are many times when distinctions and deeper clarifications have to be made. If you have ever read―or even glanced at―St. Thomas Aquinas’ magistral work, the Summa Theologica (Summary of Theology), then you will know that there IS NOT ONE SINGLE QUESTION about which St. Thomas does not make several or many distinctions before finally giving an answer to the question. Therefore, even though we might want a “black or white” answer, it often comes to us is varying shades of grey―sometimes closer to white, sometimes closer to black.

Article 12
WHICH IS THE GREATEST BATTLE?
FIGHTING CORONAVIRUS OR ITS AGENDA?

Who Lies? WHO Lies!
What lies beneath the surface? Lies lie beneath the surface! With time, lies surface! It is time to dispel some lies that surface in this Coronavirus Crisis (or Con-all-a-virus Circus) and replace them with the truth. “Lies, damned lies, and statistics” is a phrase describing the persuasive power of numbers, particularly the use of statistics, which can be manipulated untruthfully to bolster weak arguments.

Who Lies? WHO Lies!
What lies beneath the surface? Lies lie beneath the surface! With time, lies surface! It is time to dispel some lies that surface in this Coronavirus Crisis (or Con-all-a-virus Circus) and replace them with the truth. “Lies, damned lies, and statistics” is a phrase describing the persuasive power of numbers, particularly the use of statistics, which can be manipulated untruthfully to bolster weak arguments.

Hippocratic Oath Hypocrites!
Emergency room personnel have suddenly shut down comments on what is going on within hospital walls, but one brave nurse is breaking the silence. First, no one is getting preventative care, the nurse says. “I don’t hear anyone saying, ‘Hey do this to strengthen your immune system.’”

And, irrational decisions not based on sound medical science are causing harm to patients, with COVID treatments directed at them whether they have COVID or not. Then when they die, everyone is listed as having died of COVID-19, even if they were in hospice dying of something else. Co-morbidities are not being reported, either.

The medical professionals have been gagged and silenced by being told that if they speak out publicly about what is currently happening in hospitals, then they are guilty of breaking a Federal Law. Nevertheless, some do have the courage to speak out―often anonymously. Here is one such testimony of an ICU (intensive care unit) nurse of over 30 years of experience. Here is the transcript of that nurse’s revelations. Source: Dana Ashlie, YouTube, April 9th, 2020. Link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FCgea5o3ALU

Testimony of a Nurse who sees the Agenda and Hypocrisy
“I have worked in the medical field for over 30 years―all in Utah, mostly in intensive care and in all areas of intensive care. Every time I am there, basically every day something is changing … new policies, mandates from the company, that we as nurses need to follow ― and many of them don’t make any medical sense. Every time I am there, I find out something new and it just blows my mind that such rational, educated people, are acting in such an irrational way―and HARM IS BEING DONE! Care of patients―real quality care, nursing care and medical care of patients who have nothing to do with the Covid-19, who are there for other things, is being compromised―100%. We all know it―all of the doctors and nurses know it―but our hands are tied. You speak reason and you try and reason and basically what it is, is: “Do what you’re told! Act! React! Don’t stop and think about this logically―just do!” It is not based on sound medical logic―it’s not―it’s all ‘what if”―what if this Ebola multiplied by 100?? What if this is worse than any … you know … and it’s not! Honestly not! And the epidemiologists and the experienced medical people, who have a medical background, KNOW THIS! But they are being SILENCED.

“One thing you need to know about patients, who expire in a hospital, is that usually the doctor―there are many, many reasons why a patient has things that contribute to their death. Usually, in most cases, on their death certificate, the doctors only put the main contributing factor. So if someone came in with brain cancer, or bleeding, or some kind of terminal thing―and then that led, eventually, to a respiratory failure and that’s how they passed away―what gets put onto the medical record is totally up to the doctor’s discretion and a lot of times they don’t think about it until they are filling out the certificate. What people are not getting―which I know from this experience of having patients expire in the hospital a lot―is that there is pressure right now in the medical community is, even if the Covid-19, even it that patient has a positive or if they don’t, there are people who are rule-out Covids right now―which is what the majority of patients in Utah hospitals are right now and I haven’t followed [the stats] around the country―but with a “rule-out-Covid” you basically treat the patient as if they have it, until you find out that they don’t.

“And that is where INSANITY is taking place―where a doctor, who is overworked and trying to deal with multiple things at a time, and you bring a the death certificate of a person and say: “Hey! What do you want to put down as cause of death?”―and they have guidelines that they need to follow as well, but sometimes―I don’t think they are doing anything sinister with it―but I do know that there is a push―and I don’t know if it’s coming from administration or where it’s coming from, from the World Health Organization, or the CDC (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention), I don’t know, but if a patient dies, and if they are Covid positive, you put Covid as the cause of death [regardless of what other serious disease may have caused death]. I think that the Hippocratic [Oath] rules are being manipulated, and are being used to the advantage of those who want to NOT disclose information, when it would actually make people more at ease and go: “O, this person was a brittle diabetic!” or “O, they were morbidly obese!”, and all these other things.

“There was a patient who passed away in a nursing home, under hospice care―which means you’re basically DYING! But because they had a Covid test―I don’t know how they ended up getting a Covid test―that is bizarre that you would do that to a hospice patient [who is already dying from something else], but they would get a Covid test positive, so that person did not die of their terminal disease―they died of Covid! This is what is happening! This is what is happening!! That is the issue―our hands are tied and we can’t disclose this information to the media. We can’t disclose this technically to anyone―or you are breaking a Federal Law! So there is another problem as well. People are saying: “What are the facts?” and you’re going [saying]: “Well, I cannot tell you the facts―because, under law, I am required not to!” It is a tough situation to try and wake people up, because they want to hear exactly why you’re saying what you’re saying, but you can’t tell them.

The thing to remember is that each practitioner―even though you have two entities that you are operating under―one is your own personal license, where you as a nurse have the right, and where you as a physician have the right to say: “I will not do what I am being asked, because it is doing harm!” You have the legal right to refuse. But there is a different set of rules when you work for a facility or an entity. All preventative care, at this moment, is shut down. No one is getting preventative care. Dental, medical―everything is geared around if you have an emergency. I did hear a conversation of two cardiologists, basically saying that there are probably a lot of people who are just staying at home and having silent heart attacks in their home. They are experiencing symptoms, but they don’t want to call an ambulance, they are not allowed to go into an instacare―so they just opting to stay home. This whole ‘crisis’―it’s not even a crisis in my mind but a manufactured crisis. The other issue organ donation. Donor services have been nearly completely shut down at this point, in placing organs for people on the waiting list.

[As regards the hype versus the data showing the true danger or lack of danger of Covid] “I think the true data is hidden. One factor of that is the inconsistency of the testing. I was reading that all of the patents that were being submitted for the different testing machines for approval, and they all did it [the testing] in a completely different way, and, as the lab worker said: “You don’t know for sure! You can’t say 100% positive if their test comes back!” Some are being sent out to [other] facilities, some of them were done within [their own] facilities―every one of these are not uniform testing. So there you have that issue! Then you’ve got co-morbidities not being taken into account, they are not being reported. Then you can say there are Covid patients being admitted for Covid, but they are considered “kind of” Covid until it’s ruled-out, but once they are ruled-out, they don’t say: “O, never mind! Scratch that number!” The number stays! I can’t tolerate the dishonesty and the lack of integrity and giving in to the emotional side of it! We are acting as if everyone has END-STAGE AIDS!!!

“We have an immune system that is constantly being bombarded by invaders―our bodies just take care of it and we don’t skip a beat! They are treating every single staff member and patient as if they have NO INTACT IMMUNE SYSTEM! They are not facing it with rationality! There is no rationality! I don’t hear anyone saying: “Hey! Do this to strengthen your immune system!” You know―get outside, get sunshine, eat healthy food! Stress is one of the top producers of cortisol―when you produce cortisol in your body, you get this stress response and your immune system is weakened. The fear―it’s a fear of the unknown―is taking advantage of uneducated people, who do not understand how their bodies work; and do not understand the physiology of the AMAZING IMMUNE RESPONSE that your body produces; and they don’t understand the basic concepts of freedom and liberty. This is the PRIME environment and situation for people to come in and TAKE CONTROL. The population, right now, is PRIMED to be SUBJECT TO TYRANNY. What can I do about it personally? I can do something like this [reveal what is going on].” Link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FCgea5o3ALU

German Epidemiologist Speaks Out
Dr. Wittkowski received his Ph.D. in computer science from the University of Stuttgart and his Sc.D. (Habilitation) in Medical Biometry from the Eberhard-Karls-University Tuüingen, both Germany. He worked for 15 years with Klaus Dietz, a leading epidemiologist, on the Epidemiology of HIV, before heading (for 20 years) the Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Research Design at The Rockefeller University, New York. Dr. Wittkowski is currently residing in New York and is the CEO of ASDERA LLC, a company discovering novel treatments for complex diseases from data of genome-wide association studies.

In an interview on how to best to deal with COVID-19, Dr. Wittkowski said: “As with every respiratory disease, we should protect the elderly and fragile because when they get pneumonia, they have a high risk of dying of the pneumonia. So that is one of the key issues that we should keep in mind. On the other hand, children do very well with these diseases. They’re designed to be exposed to all sorts of viruses during their lifetime, and so they should keep going to school and infecting each other. Then, that contributes to herd immunity, which means that after about four weeks at the most, the elderly people could start joining their family because then the virus would have been extinguished. With all respiratory diseases, the only thing that stops the disease is herd immunity. About 80% of the people need to have had contact with the virus, and the majority of them won’t even have recognized that they were infected, or they had very, very mild symptoms, especially if they are children. So, it’s very important to keep the schools open and kids mingling to spread the virus to get herd immunity as fast as possible, and then the elderly people, who should be separated, and the nursing homes should be closed during that time, can come back and meet their children and grandchildren after about 4 weeks when the virus has been exterminated.”

[Asked about the press briefing where Fauci, and the President, and the rest of the people assembled, were saying that, had they not done the containment strategy that they have done, that upwards of 2 million people would have died in the United States] Dr. Wittkowski commented, sarcastically: “Well, I’m not paid by the government, so I’m entitled to actually do science. If by the government, there had been no intervention, the epidemic would have been over, like every other respiratory disease epidemic.”

Lies, Damned Lies and Statistics
[As for estimated potential deaths] Dr. Wittkowski said: “Let’s take realistic numbers in the United Sates. We have about 25,000 cases every day, that is probably the upper limit—make it 30,000—who knows? But let’s talk about 25,000. 2% of them will actually have symptoms—that is 500 cases a day. Maybe a third or a fifth—let’s say half of them—will need to be hospitalized. That’s 250 patients a day. If they have been hospitalized for about 10 days, that means that we will have—our hospital system will have to deal with 2,500 patients every day for a certain period of time—that could be 3 or 4 weeks, and then the number will dramatically decrease again and the whole epidemic will be over. 2% of all symptomatic cases will die. That is 2% of the 250,000 a day. So that is 500 people a day, and that will happen over 4 weeks. So, that could be as high as 10,000 people. Now, that compares to the normal numbers of flus during the flu season, and we have in the United States about 35,000 deaths due to flu every year during the flu season. So, it would be part of the normal situation during the flu season. There is a statistic for flu deaths. It’s currently at about 10,000 to 12,000. So, together with the Corona deaths, it’s about regular flu season. I don’t know where these [over-inflated] numbers are coming from—they’re totally unrealistic. There are no indications that this flu is fundamentally different from every other flu. We know what happened in China, we know what happened in South Korea, we know what happened, or is happening, in Europe. There are no indications that anything is different from a regular flu. Maybe it’s a bit worse than other flus—could be?”

Social Distancing and Herd Immunity
[With regard to the policy that was enacted in most places throughout the world―the policy of containment, shelter-in-place, etc., ] Dr. Wittkowski said: “What people are trying to do is flatten the curve. I don’t really know why. But, what happens is if you flatten the curve, you also prolong, to widen it, and it takes more time. And I don’t see a good reason for a respiratory disease to stay in the population longer than necessary. We had two other SARS viruses before. Or, coronaviruses. It’s not the first coronavirus that comes out, and it won’t be the last. And for all respiratory diseases, we have the same type of an epidemic. If you leave it alone, it comes for two weeks, it peaks, and it goes for two weeks and it’s gone. There are no more new cases in China and in South Korea. The number of new cases in Europe is already beginning to decline. The virus came later to the US, so here we see a bit of an incline, maybe, and leveling off within the next couple of days. And if we see that the cases are not increasing dramatically, that means that the number of new infections has already declined substantially and peaked about a week ago.”

[On the point of social distancing] Dr. Wittkowski said: “I looked into the claim that people make that, in China and South Korea, the social distancing had successfully helped to control the epidemic. I looked at the dates when people actually started social distancing. In China, the epidemic peaked on February 1st to February 5th, in that period. But the schools were not closed until February the 20th—that was 2 weeks later. In South Korea, we have a similar pattern. In Daegu, or however that city is being pronounced, where the Church of Shincheonji had that outbreak. The self-quarantine was ordered only on February the 23rd, but the peak in that city happened; the national distancing was not advised until February the 29th, so that’s a week later, when the national peak happened. So, both in China and in South Korea, social distancing started only long after the number of infections had already started to decline, and therefore had very little impact on the epidemic. That means they had already reached herd immunity or were about to reach herd immunity. They were very close. But by installing the social distancing, they prevented it to actually getting to the final point, and this is why we are still seeing new cases in South Korea, several weeks after the peak.

“Testing doesn’t stop anything by itself. Testing could give us, if we do antibody testing, not testing for the actual virus. If we do antibody testing, we would actually get an estimate of how close we are to herd immunity. That could be useful. But, testing for people who are infectious means they probably have already been, for two or three days, been in for half of their infectious period. Now, they are being tested positive what are they supposed to do? We are already having social distancing. They can’t do much more than they are already doing. Testing for respiratory disease is neither necessary nor effective.

“Tracing with an airborne disease is even more difficult than tracing with a sexually transmitted disease which is difficult enough, as we know from AIDS. Most people know who they had contact with, sexual contact with, over the last two weeks. As a human being travelling the subway in New York and doing other things in New York that we just have to do in New York, I couldn’t tell you who the two three four hundred thousand people are I came in contact with over the last two weeks. So, contrast tracing for a respiratory disease is impossible. You cannot stop the spread of a respiratory disease within a family, and you cannot stop it from spreading with neighbors, with people who are delivering, who are physicians—anybody. People are social, and even in times of social distancing, they have contacts, and any of those contacts could spread the disease. It will go slowly [because of social distancing], and so it will not build up herd immunity, but it will happen. And it will go on forever unless we let it go. People started with social distancing, as imperfect as it is, before the epidemic could reach the level that is needed to develop herd immunity.

“If we had herd immunity now, there couldn’t be a second wave in autumn [the fall]. The second wave is a direct consequence of social distancing. Herd immunity lasts for a couple of years, typically, and that’s why the last SARS epidemic we had in 2003, it lasted 15 years for enough people to become susceptible again so that a new epidemic could spread of a related virus. Because typically, there is something that requires cross-immunity, so if you were exposed to one of the SARS viruses, you are less likely to fall ill with another SARS virus. So, if we had herd immunity, we wouldn’t have a second wave. However, if we are preventing herd immunity from developing, it is almost guaranteed that we have a second wave as soon as either we stop the social distancing or the climate changes with winter coming or something like that.

“We should be resisting, and we should, at least, hold our politicians responsible. We should have a discussion with our politicians. One thing we definitely need to do, and that would be safe and effective, is opening schools. Let the children spread the virus among themselves, which is a necessity to get herd immunity. That was probably one of the most destructive actions the government has done. We should focus on the elderly and separating them from the population where the virus is circulating. We should not prevent the virus from circulating among school children, which is the fastest way to create herd immunity. If 80% of people have had contact with the virus and are therefore immune, and that, typically, that contact is just a form of immunization. So, there is no disease, there’s nothing happening, and still there is immunity. If 80% of people are immune and somebody has a virus and is infectious, it will be very difficult for that infectious person to find somebody who is still susceptible, not immune. And therefore, this person will not infect anybody else and therefore we won’t have the disease spreading. That is herd immunity.

“The problem is, if we are artificially keeping the number of infections low among low-risk people like schoolchildren and their parents, we may not have reached herd immunity yet, so if we are stopping, we may have an increase in the number of new infections. That is the downside of starting containment. We should not believe that we are more intelligent than Mother Nature was when we were evolving. Mother Nature was pretty good at making sure that we’re a good match for the disease that we happen to see virtually every year.”

Vaccines?
[On the subject of vaccines] Dr. Wittkowski said: “We don’t have a vaccine against the common cold. We don’t have—we have some vaccines against flu, but they are not that effective. Would it be nice to have a vaccine against SARS? Yeah. It would be nice. But it would help to create herd immunity a bit faster, because those who have the vaccine are already immune, and those who don’t, they just need to be exposed to become immune. For some reason that we haven’t fully understood yet, humankind has survived all sorts of respiratory diseases. Nature has a way of making sure that we survive.

“We don’t die of the virus. We die of pneumonia. So, if we have a virus respiratory disease, the disease—once the body has created antibodies, the immune system has created antibodies, the antibodies, or the immune system is killing all infected cells which destroys much of the mucosa. And bacteria can easily settle on that destroyed mucosa, and then cause pneumonia. And it is the pneumonia that is killing people, if it’s not treated. I had a virus, whatever it was, maybe it was—who knows—about three weeks ago, and my physician gave me the antibiotics I should take if the disease gets better and then gets worse, because that is a sign of pneumonia and then we have to treat the pneumonia.”

Article 13
A DANGEROUS SIDE-EFFECT OF CORONAVIRUS IS TOTALITARIANISM

The Broad Wide Road to Where?
Where is Coronavirus leading us? Our Lord says: “Wide is the gate, and broad is the way that leadeth to destruction, and many there are who go in thereat” (Matthew 7:13). They say that people die from various complications caused by the Coronavirus or COVID-19, well perhaps the greatest complication, or worst side-effect that has been noticed as resulting from COVID-19 is the pernicious, dangerous and ubiquitous side-effect of TOTALITARIANISM. We could take Our Lord’s words and rephrase them: “Wide is the gate, and broad is the way that leadeth to totalitarianism, and many there are who go in thereat!” Now, since most of us have been dumbed-down by the mega-hours spent watching, reading and talking about absolute TRIVIA―the overwhelmingly unimportant stuff that has been given overinflated importance―it is highly likely that as a result, vast numbers of people have a vague idea or even no idea of what “Totalitarianism” actually is. Catholics might think it means that the world has become totally Arian―but then very few even know what “Arianism” is, or if they know it was a heresy, they would have a tough time explaining what the heresy was all about!

So, for the benefit of those who are rather misty or foggy or clueless about the word “Totalitarianism”―let us first define it and then see if it applies to anything, anyone or any particular body of people.

Totalitarianism Revealed, Unmasked, Explained
TOTALITARIANISM is defined as: “A system of government that is centralized and dictatorial and requires complete subservience to the state.” Totalitarianism is further described as being a political system, or a form of government, that permits no individual freedom and that seeks to subordinate all aspects of individual life to the authority of the state; and exercises an extremely high degree of control over public and private life. It prohibits opposition parties, restricts individual opposition to the state and its claims. Historian Robert Conquest describes a totalitarian state as one which recognizes no limit on its authority in any sphere of public or private life and it extends that authority to whatever length is feasible.

It is regarded as the most extreme and complete form of authoritarianism. In totalitarian states, political power has often been held by autocrats, who employ all-encompassing campaigns in which propaganda is broadcast by state-controlled mass media. An autocracy is a system of government in which an autocrat, defined as a single person or party, possesses supreme and absolute power. The decisions of this autocrat are subject to neither external legal restraints nor regularized mechanisms of popular control.

Totalitarian regimes are often characterized by extensive political repression, a complete lack of democracy, widespread personality cultism, absolute control over the economy, restrictions on speech, mass surveillance, and widespread use of state terrorism. Other aspects of a totalitarian regime include the use of concentration camps, repressive secret police, religious persecution or state atheism, the extensive practice of capital punishment, fraudulent elections (if they take place), and potentially state-sponsored mass murder and genocides.

Italian dictator Benito Mussolini coined the term “totalitario” in the early 1920s to characterize the new fascist state of Italy, which he further described as “all within the state, none outside the state, none against the state.” By the beginning of World War II, the word “totalitarian” had become synonymous with absolute and oppressive single-party government. Other modern examples of totalitarian states include the Soviet Union under Joseph Stalin, Nazi Germany under Adolf Hitler, the People’s Republic of China under Mao Zedong, and North Korea under the Kim dynasty.

Totalitarian regimes are different from other authoritarian regimes. The authoritarian state denotes a state in which the single power holder could be either an individual dictator, or a committee, or a junta, or an otherwise small group of political elite, which monopolizes political power. The authoritarian state is only concerned with political power and, as long as it is not contested, it gives society a certain degree of liberty. Authoritarianism does not attempt to change the world and human nature. In contrast, a totalitarian regime attempts to control virtually all aspects of the social life, including the economy, education, art, science, private life and morals of citizens.

USA Becomes Totalitarian in a National State of Emergency
While you were watching TV, or following sports, or browsing social media or surfing the internet, or out socializing―legislation was being passed and Executive Orders were being made to subjugate you to a totalitarian state of affairs in the event of any and every National Emergency. In other words, you lose all you freedoms and rights. In a National Emergency―which President Trump declared on March 13th, 2020―FEMA (Federal Emergency Management Agency) has more power than the President of the United States or the Congress. In a National Emergency, FEMA is given the power to (1) suspend laws; (2) move entire populations; (3) arrest and detain citizens without a warrant and hold them without trial; (4) seize property, food supplies and transportation systems; and (5) can suspend the Constitution.

Executive Orders Execute Your Freedoms
“Executive Orders” might well fall into the same misty, foggy or clueless categories as “Totalitarianism”! So what are Executive Orders? In the United States, a Federal Executive Order is a directive issued by the President of the United States that manages operations of the Federal government. Some policy initiatives require approval by the legislative branch, but Executive Orders have significant influence over the internal affairs of government, deciding how and to what degree legislation will be enforced, dealing with emergencies, waging wars, and in general fine-tuning policy choices in the implementation of broad statutes. As the head of state and head of government of the United States, as well as commander-in-chief of the United States Armed Forces, only the President of the United States can issue an Executive Order.

Here are some Executive Orders you may want to know about, or need to know about:

When a State of Emergency is declared, EXECUTIVE ORDER NUMBER 11921 allows the Federal Emergency Preparedness Agency to develop plans to establish: (1) control over the mechanisms of production and distribution; (2) control over energy sources; (3) control over wages and salaries; (4) control over credit and the flow of money in U.S. financial institutions in any national emergency.

When a State of Emergency is declared by the President, EXECUTIVE ORDER NUMBER 11921 also forbids Congress from reviewing the action for six months.

FEMA (Federal Emergency Management Agency) was created in a series of Executive Orders. A Presidential Executive Order―whether Constitutional or not―becomes law simply by its publication in the Federal Registry. Congress is thereby by-passed.

► EXECUTIVE ORDER NUMBER 12148 created FEMA (Federal Emergency Management Agency) that is meant to interface with the Department of Defense, for civil defense, planning and funding. An “emergency czar” was appointed.

► EXECUTIVE ORDER NUMBER 12656 appointed the National Security Council as the principal body that should consider emergency powers. This allows the government to increase domestic intelligence and surveillance of U.S. citizens and allows the restriction of freedom of movement within the United States, and grants the government the right to isolate large groups of civilians. The National Guard could be federalized to seal all borders and take control of U.S. air space and ports of entry.

► EXECUTIVE ORDER NUMBER 10990 allows the government to take over all modes of transportation and the control of all highways and seaports.

► EXECUTIVE ORDER NUMBER 10995 allows the government to seize and control the communications media.

► EXECUTIVE ORDER NUMBER 10997 allows the government to take over all electrical power, gas, petroleum, fuels and minerals.

► EXECUTIVE ORDER NUMBER 10998 allows the government to take over all food resources and farms.

► EXECUTIVE ORDER NUMBER 11000 allows the government to mobilize civilians into work brigades under government supervision.

► EXECUTIVE ORDER NUMBER 11001 allows the government to take over all health, education and welfare functions.

► EXECUTIVE ORDER NUMBER 11002 designates the Postmaster General to operate a national registration of all persons.

► EXECUTIVE ORDER NUMBER 11003 allows the government to take over all airports and aircraft, including commercial aircraft.

► EXECUTIVE ORDER NUMBER 11004 allows the Housing and Finance Authority to relocate communities; build new housing with public funds; designate areas to be abandoned; and establish new locations for populations.

► EXECUTIVE ORDER NUMBER 11005 allows the government to take over railroads, inland waterways and public storage facilities.

► EXECUTIVE ORDER NUMBER 11051 specifies the responsibility of the Office of Emergency Planning and gives authorization to put all Executive Orders into effect in times of increased international tensions and economic or financial crisis.

► EXECUTIVE ORDER NUMBER 11310 grants authority to the Department of Justice to enforce the plans set out in Executive Orders; to institute industrial support; to establish judicial and legislative liaison; to control all aliens; to operate penal and correctional institutions.

► EXECUTIVE ORDER NUMBER 11049 assigns emergency preparedness function to Federal departments and agencies, consolidating 21 operative Executive Orders issued over a fifteen year period.

So right now―whether you know it not, accept it or not, believe it or not―since the day he declared the USA to be in a National State of Emergency from March 13th, 2020―the President is not in charge of the country, nor does Congress have any say in running the country. The ruler of the country is―by EXECUTIVE ORDERS 11921 & 12148―in the hands of FEMA (Federal Emergency Management Agency). The President, the members of Congress, the local state governors―are now all obedient puppets of FEMA! Another question arises―“Who is pulling the strings of FEMA?”―for FEMA itself is a puppet of higher puppet-masters. Of course, ultimately, it is Satan―but between Satan and FEMA there are a few more layers of puppets and puppet-masters.

Heading for a New World Order
President George H.W. Bush, in his September 11th, 1990, Address Before a Joint Session of Congress on the Persian Gulf Crisis, said: “The crisis in the Persian Gulf, as grave as it is, also offers a rare opportunity to move toward an historic period of cooperation. Out of these troubled times, our fifth objective — a New World Order — can emerge: a new era — freer from the threat of terror, stronger in the pursuit of justice, and more secure in the quest for peace. An era in which the nations of the world, East and West, North and South, can prosper and live in harmony. A hundred generations have searched for this elusive path to peace, while a thousand wars raged across the span of human endeavor. Today that New World is struggling to be born, a world quite different from the one we've known. A world where the rule of law supplants the rule of the jungle. A world in which nations recognize the shared responsibility for freedom and justice. A world where the strong respect the rights of the weak. This is the vision that I shared with (the Russian Communist) President Gorbachev in Helsinki. He and other leaders from Europe, the Gulf, and around the world understand that how we manage this crisis today could shape the future for generations to come. The test we face is great, and so are the stakes. This is the first assault on the new world that we seek, the first test of our mettle.” (George H.W. Bush, September 11th, 1990).

Four months later, in a televised speech from the Oval Office, on January 17th, 1991, President George H.W. Bush again spoke of forming a New World Order: “We have before us the opportunity to forge, for ourselves and future generations, a New World Order! A world where the rule of law―not the law of the jungle―governs the conduct of nations! When we are successful―and we will be―we have a real chance at this New World Order―an Order in which an incredible United Nations can use its peace-keeping role to fulfill the promise and vision of the United Nations founders.” (George H.W. Bush, January 17th, 1991).

Just under two weeks later, President George H.W. Bush later said in his State of the Union Message to the Nation, on January 30th, 1991: “We are Americans, part of something larger than ourselves. For two centuries, we have done the hard work of freedom and today we lead the world in facing-down a threat to decency and humanity. What is at stake is more than one small country! It is a big idea! A New World Order―where diverse nations are drawn together in common cause, to achieve the universal aspirations of mankind―peace, security, freedom and the rule of law. Such is a world worthy of our struggle and worthy of our children’s future!” (George H.W. Bush, January 30th, 1991).

Kissinger Still Kissing the New World Order at 96 Years of Age
Henry Kissinger has been round the elitist block a few times! He has had major impact on US politics―both on the “front line” and later “behind the scenes”. Born in May of 1923, he will be 97 years old in May of 2020. He is Jewish refugee who fled Nazi Germany with his family in 1938, first to London in the UK and then to the USA in the same year. During the Second World War, he joined the US Army and was assigned to the military intelligence section and soon after reassigned to the Counter Intelligence Corps (CIC), where he became a CIC Special Agent.

In 1955, he was a consultant to the National Security Council's Operations Coordinating Board. During 1955 and 1956, he was also study director in nuclear weapons and foreign policy at the Council on Foreign Relations. From 1956 to 1958 he worked for the Rockefeller Brothers Fund as director of its Special Studies Project. Keen to have a greater influence on U.S. foreign policy, Kissinger became foreign policy advisor to the presidential campaigns of Nelson Rockefeller, supporting his bids for the Republican nomination in 1960, 1964, and 1968. Kissinger then helped Richard Nixon win the presidential campaign and was appointed as National Security Advisor in 1969. Kissinger was a practitioner of Realpolitik―which is politics or diplomacy based primarily on circumstances and factors, ignoring if necessary, all ideological notions, moral and ethical principles. In other words: “Get it done―regardless of whether it’s moral or not!” Kissinger remains a controversial and polarizing figure in American politics, both condemned as an alleged war criminal by many journalists, political activists, and human rights lawyers.

After Nixon’s demise, he served President Ford. Kissinger has been one of the most frequent invites to the annual Bilderberg Group meetings―having attended in 1957, 1964, 1966, 1971, 1973, 1974, 1977, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2015, 2016, 2018, 2019―so, as you can see he was almost like “family” at the Bilderberg Group. As you probably know, many persons point to the Bilderberg Group as an organization that seeks to promote a New World Order and a One World Government. The former member of the UK Parliament for 40 years, Denis Healey, ex-Labour Party Chancellor of the Exchequer, also a founding member of the Bilderberg Group and 30 years a steering Bilderberg committee member, spoke to Jon Ronson, the author of Them: Adventures With Extremists, saying: “To say we were striving for a one-world government is exaggerated, but not wholly unfair!” Hmm!

After officially retiring from politics in 1977, Kissinger continued to participate in policy groups, such as the Trilateral Commission, and to maintain political consulting, speaking, and writing engagements. Talking of writing―in a recent April 2020 article for The Wall Street Journal, entitled “The Coronavirus Pandemic Will Forever Alter the World Order”, Kissinger clearly shows that New World Order idea is “alive and well” and that it has not been ‘infected’ by the Coronavirus, but has profited from it. Among other things, Kissinger states:

“Leaders are dealing with the crisis on a largely national basis, but the virus’s society-dissolving effects do not recognize borders” […] “The world will never be the same after the coronavirus” and called for the government to launch “a parallel enterprise for the transition to the post-coronavirus order.” […] “While the assault on human health will — hopefully — be temporary, the political and economic upheaval it has unleashed could last for generations.” […] “No country, not even the U.S., can in a purely national effort overcome the virus. Addressing the necessities of the moment must ultimately be coupled with a global collaborative vision and program. If we cannot do both in tandem, we will face the worst of each.” […] “The world’s democracies need to defend and sustain their Enlightenment values… (and) safeguard the principles of the Liberal World Order.”

Gates of Hell
More than 50 years ago, Kissinger was Secretary of State and head of the US National Security Council and author of the National Strategic Security Memorandum 200 (NSSM 200), which said: “According to the memorandum, depopulation should be the highest priority in US foreign policy towards the Third World”, (…) because the US economy needs large and growing amounts of raw materials from overseas, especially from the less developed countries” (Eggert, W. (2003). The planned epidemics AIDS – SARS and military genetic research. Munich, p. 64)

In an opinion piece for the Wall Street Journal, Kissinger called for “a first step to develop ‘new techniques and technologies for infection control and appropriate vaccines for large populations’. (…) In a second step, the focus should now be on ‘healing the wounds of the global economy’” (quoted in RT Deutsch https://de.rt.com/25kn)

Kissinger and the The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation seem to agree on the question of “mass protection vaccination”. On March 31st, 2020, the Washington Post published an opinion article by Gates in which he describes his vision to vaccinate people around the world. You could say it is all about the Gates of Hell! In the article, Bill Gates says:

“To bring the disease to an end, we’ll need a safe and effective vaccine. If we do everything right, we could have one in less than 18 months — about the fastest a vaccine has ever been developed. But creating a vaccine is only half the battle. To protect Americans and people around the world, we’ll need to manufacture billions of doses. Without a vaccine, developing countries are at even greater risk than wealthy ones, because it’s even harder for them to do physical distancing and shutdowns. We can start now by building the facilities where these vaccines will be made. Because many of the top candidates are made using unique equipment, we’ll have to build facilities for each of them, knowing that some won’t get used. Private companies can’t take that kind of risk, but the federal government can. It’s a great sign that the administration made deals this week with at least two companies to prepare for vaccine manufacturing. I hope more deals will follow … In 2015, I urged world leaders in a TED [Technology-Education-Design] talk to prepare for a pandemic the same way they prepare for war — by running simulations to find the cracks in the system. As we’ve seen this year, we have a long way to go. But I still believe that if we make the right decisions now, informed by science, data and the experience of medical professionals, we can save lives and get the country back to work.”

Is the vaccination program related to the objective of reducing world population―as advocated by Henry Kissinger? God knows! But God isn’t telling!

Article 14
ANOTHER DANGEROUS SIDE-EFFECT OF CORONAVIRUS IS TOTAL STUPIDITY

Stupid or Insane?
Has the world gone insane? Or is it just plain stupid? What on earth is going on in the minds of people in the face of this Coronavirus Pandemic, or as some say: “Crony-virus Plandemic.” Are we being taken for a ride―a ride to the lunatic asylum? Has world succumbed to (or been “dumbed” into) a lobotomy pandemic, where everyone has had some crucial piece of their brain removed―with the result that they a mere mental zombies, unable to think clearly for themselves and relying upon the junk "truths" they are spoon-fed by the world's mainstream media?

Stupidity is defined as “behavior that shows a lack of good sense or judgment; the quality of being stupid or unintelligent”. In a character study of The Stupid Man―attributed to the Greek philosopher Theophrastus (c. 371 – c. 287 BC)―stupidity was defined as “mental slowness in speech or action.” The root word “stupid”―which can serve as an adjective or noun―comes from the Latin verb “stupere”, for being numb or astonished, and is related to “stupor.” In Roman culture, the “stupidus” was the professional “fall guy” in the theatrical mimes―the dope who falls for anything and everything.

According to the Merriam-Webster dictionary, the words “stupid” and “stupidity” entered the English language in 1541. The modern English word “stupid” has taken its place along with “fool,” “idiot,” “dumb,” “moron,” and related words, as indicating an absence of mental capacity. It has a broad range of application, from being slow of mind (indicating a lack of intelligence, care or reason), dullness of feeling or sensation (torpidity, senseless, insensitivity), or lacking interest or point (vexing, exasperating). It can either imply a congenital lack of capacity for reasoning, or a temporary state of daze, or slow-mindedness.

Insanity, according the definition in law, is said to be: “Mental illness of such a severe nature that a person cannot distinguish fantasy from reality, cannot conduct her/his affairs due to psychosis, or is subject to uncontrollable impulsive behavior.”

Stress, Stupidity and Mental Illness
Speaking of mental illness―the media reports that “Major retailers, psychologists and the nation’s top grocery worker union say they anticipate a greater need for mental health services, such as therapy, as people continue to work during the pandemic and later cope with its aftermath. Anxiety, depression and other mental health challenges may linger, even as coronavirus cases level out or decline — especially for those on the front lines.” (CNBC, April 16th, 2020).

► The Mayo Clinic adds: “Worries and anxiety about COVID-19 and its impact can be overwhelming. Social distancing makes it even more challenging. Learn ways to cope during this pandemic. The COVID-19 pandemic has likely brought many changes to how you live your life, and with it uncertainty, altered daily routines, financial pressures and social isolation. You may worry about getting sick, how long the pandemic will last and what the future will bring. Information overload, rumors and misinformation can make your life feel out of control and make it unclear what to do. During the COVID-19 pandemic, you may experience stress, anxiety, fear, sadness and loneliness. And mental health disorders, including anxiety and depression, can worsen” (Mayo Clinic online, April 2nd, 2020).

► Even the CDC (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention) admits that “human judgment and decision-making under stress” can be severely affected. “The impact of the effect of stress on professional judgment is significant. During an emergency situation, critical judgments are frequently made under conditions of temporary or prolonged stress [and] under severe time constraints … It is believed that the competence of human judgment is decreased by stress [and] that stress narrows the focus of attention, implying a negative impact on judgment … Stressed subjects focus on the general outline of the problem, while non-stressed individuals rely on in-depth analysis … People frequently fail to gather the right kinds of information, which prevents them from making appropriate responses … If a situation involves risk―as in response to an emergency―time pressure studies show that the subject becomes more cautious and adopts risk-avoiding behavior, with an importance placed on avoiding losses. These studies have shown that under time pressure, the subject adopts a simpler mode of information processing, in which alternatives are not explored fully.” (CDC Paper on Stress, Dr. Kathleen Kowalksi, Ph.D, & Dr. Charles Vaught, Ph.D).

► Dr. John Neustadt, of NBI Health, writes: “Chronic stress wreaks havoc on your health. It contributes to leaky gut, headaches, poor sleep and insomnia, heart disease, dementia and getting infections. It also makes you dumber … Research demonstrates in high stress situations, people end up making riskier decisions that are more likely to hurt than help them … In high stress situations, people also start to focus on things that are irrelevant, such as worrying about the consequences of doing poorly or making the wrong decision. We have limited attention, and these distractions compete for, and take away, the mental energy required to focus on what’s really important to do our best … To your body, physical and emotional stress are the same. Whether you stub your toe or worried you won’t make a deadline, the body’s response is the same. It releases hormones that are part of the fight or flight response. The analogy that is often used to teach this concept to medical students is: “Imagine that you’re being chased by a tiger.” The body has two responses. It either flees or battles it out … While these hormones can save your life in truly life-or-death situations―the majority of threats in our world today are all in your head. The fact is that the vast majority of catastrophes that you’ve ever imagined never happened—except in your mind … We are constantly scanning our environment for danger. People worry about how they’ll pay bills, about their health, about global warming, their marriage, their kids, their jobs or any of the dozens of other things people worry about. Add to that our 24/7 news cycle and being constantly connected to our technology and people are experiencing an unprecedented amount of stress … One of the biggest reasons people feel stressed is because they don’t deal with issues that are bothering them. Avoiding the problem doesn’t make it go away. In fact, letting problems fester often makes them worse. Facing issues head on, recognizing them, being honest with yourself and others about them, and coming up with a plan to deal with them are the best ways to feel more in control of your life and reduce your stress.” (Dr. John Neustadt, NBI Health).

► Dr. David Russell, a clinical psychologist, writes: “Chronic stress hormones trigger mindless habits instead of thoughtful action. When you are under chronic stress your brain releases stress hormones which actually change your brain, enlarging the part of your brain that controls habits and shrinking the part of your brain that makes conscious decisions. The tendency to operate through habits happens immediately when you are stressed out and gets much worse in the days and weeks that follow as the physical changes in your brain take effect. Mindless habits ignore your needs and goals. While habits are really useful things, the habit center of your brain doesn’t take into account really important things like your needs and goals. If you have a habit of eating at the kitchen table, then the habit center of your brain will send signals to eat every time you sit down at the kitchen table, regardless of whether it is meal-time, or if you are even hungry, or if you have just started a diet. You need the decision-making center of your brain in order to choose the action that best meets your current needs and moves your forward toward your goals. So when stress shifts the balance of power from the decision-making center to the habit center you end up doing whatever you did in the same situation in the past even if that behavior has zero chance of helping you meet your needs and goals.” (Dr. David Russell, clinical psychologist).

► Dr. Steven Stein, an expert in Emotional Intelligence, says: “Stress affects Emotional Intelligence.” No doubt you know what “IQ” stands for―Intelligence Quotient. Well, there is also an “EQ”, which stands of “Emotional Quotient”. Do not confuse Emotional Intelligence with just plain old being emotional and letting off steam! Emotional Intelligence is all about understanding and controlling emotions―being plain old emotional is a lack of control of emotions and irrational, and betrays a lack of Emotional Intelligence. Emotional Intelligence is meant to be just that―intelligent. Plain old emotionalism is not being ruled by our intelligence, but is irrational. These days, people are just too emotional because they lack Emotional Intelligence―which is basically our intelligence controlling our emotions―and these people allow the reverse to take place, whereby their emotions control or have the upper-hand, or first-say over their intelligence. In other words, they feel more than they think.

If stress prevents us from being aware of and controlling our emotions, getting along with others, adapting to changes, and maintaining a positive mood, then our Emotional Intelligence is going to suffer. That doesn’t surprise Dr. Stein, after all, he says, “only one out of nine people actually change their behavior after a heart attack, and that’s even when they’re told they must change or die.”

According to Dr. Stein, stress harms a worker in many ways:
• It affects decision-making, making us too impulsive [we fail to search for and discern the truth].
• It forces us to make mistakes [lack of research and understanding breeds poor choices and decisions].
• It causes us to ignore cues [we are faced with the obvious―but fail to react and act].
• It lowers productivity―both mental and physical [our thoughts and actions become paralyzed].

Stress Has Made Already “Dumbed-Down” People Even More Dumb or Stupid
The term “dumbing down” was a secret code used by film writers in the 1930s to revise scripts to appeal to viewers of lower intelligence. And for the last few decades, this phrase reflects a painful reality; today's Americans are in serious intellectual trouble. American intellectualism has suffered greatly in the past few decades as video and social media cultures have replaced print culture. Looking at pictures is easier than reading! “Ah!” you may say, “but a picture is worth a thousand words!” Maybe, but what if those words are mere “baby words” for a baby mind?

Americans are being “dumbed down” more than ever these days. The attention span of many people has been reduced to that of a flea. Too many people are opting for instant gratification via smartphone interactions. The study and analysis of complex topics―through serious, studious and careful reading―is disappearing. We believe the first thing we hear. Intellectual laziness is a viral pandemic that has infected most people, who just absorb whatever occurs in short digital bursts on social media and by perpetually sharing trivia with others. The smart phone has become an addiction; it must now be viewed at every waking moment! Worst of all, the truly important things that really matter, are being minimized or ignored. The smart phone’s informational messaging is often superficial and spoon feeds us “the minimal” while shortchanging our thinking. Reporting of the news on the internet and television is increasingly becoming a form of entertainment, hyperbole and sound bursts.

The most obvious example of how Americans have been dumbed down is through this nation’s failed public education system. At one time, not too long ago, America reigned supreme as a leading model for the rest of the world providing the best quality free public K-12 education system on the planet. But over the last many decades, while much of the rest of the world has been passing us by, it seems as though an insidious agenda has been implemented to condition and brainwash a population to become a mindless, robotic citizenry that simply does what it is told―and, of course, that brainwashing commences early in America’s schools.

Over numerous decades, a grand experiment, engaging in social engineering with America’s youth, has been steadily working to create a lowest common denominator product of sub-par mediocrity, creating generations of young Americans who can neither read nor write, nor think for themselves in any critical manner. The progressive education system has moved the emphasis from actual learning, to the superficial discussion of politically correct issues, which has ensured that schoolchildren are incapable of critical thought as they approach adolescence. Fact has been replaced by fiction―and the media has increasingly become the distributor of fiction rather than fact. According to a 2013 study, by the US Department of Education, 19% of US high school graduates could not read, and 21% of adults read below 5th grade level ― these alarming rates had not changed over the previous ten years (since 2003).

American culture is being dumbed down. Advertising is now what makes up American Culture. Magazines, newspapers, and other media forms are held in the grasp of powerful advertisers. Newspapers, whether in print or online, automatically dumb down their content in order to increase their readership and thus increase profit. Self-destruction of the press brought about the declination of newspaper readership. But the viral explosion of electronic media has diminished our priceless historical and classical education. According to a study by the National Endowment for the Arts, reading today has the least influence on our intellectual maturity! What a sad, pathetic but revealing comment! America has been reduced to the level of a child―loving and looking at pictures and images! Furthermore, it is easy to lie to a child because of the child's limited intelligence!

People with lesser intellectual abilities tend to overrate and overstate their level of knowledge and understanding. You might see a bad call by a football referee―your first reaction might be to say that you could have got that call right―but you are totally not trained as a referee and wouldn’t have a clue about what call to make on most plays. This perception of illusory superiority comes from people not being equipped to realize that they don’t know what they don’t know. That in turn makes it all the more difficult to separate out “fake news” from reality―which leads people to believe the first thing they hear or read. Research shows that most Americans who see fake news believe it.

Repeated Lies Start to Sound Like the Truth!
You will have heard of the expression: “Tell a lie enough times and they will believe it!” Most scholars and researchers trace the origins of that saying back to Adolph Hitler and Joseph Goebbels, Hitler’s Minister of Propaganda for the Nazi German government of the Third Reich―both of whom understood the power of repeating falsehoods. Joseph Goebbels is on record as saying: “If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it.” This phenomenon―which is very common in today’s politics, advertising, and social media―is known in cognitive psychology as the “illusory truth effect” ― meaning that illusion takes on an appearance of truth, but is not the truth. The implications for daily life―where consumers of news and products are often repeatedly exposed to both plausible and implausible falsehoods―is that even patent lies may slowly become more credible, if given enough repetition.

Multiple studies have found that repeated false statements seem more truthful than new ones, occasional ones, or single ones. At one time, passing-off the illusion as truth was thought to be limited to uncertain statements, or those in which people had no other information available, such as prior knowledge―which also arises from a lack of intelligence or intellectual ability, due to being “dumbed-down” and not being able to think analytically and critically. However, a recent study, published in Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, indicated that belief in ALL statements―whether they are believable or unbelievable―automatically increases with repetition. Apply that to the Coronavirus propaganda! If you hear the propaganda enough times, you will start to believe it―a little bit more with each time―especially if your mind is has turned to mush through reading superficial trivia that you have lost any ability to research, analyze, filter and compare information and judge―believing the first thing you hear and believing what is said often.

A “big lie” (German: grosse Lüge) is a propaganda technique and logical fallacy (deception). The expression “big lie” was coined by Adolf Hitler, when he dictated his 1925 book Mein Kampf, about the use of a lie: “All this was inspired by the principle—which is quite true within itself—that in the big lie there is always a certain force of credibility; because the broad masses of a nation are always more easily corrupted in the deeper strata of their emotional nature, than consciously or voluntarily; and thus―in the primitive simplicity of their minds―they more readily fall victims to the big lie than the small lie, since they themselves often tell small lies in little matters, but would be ashamed to resort to large-scale falsehoods. It would never come into their heads to fabricate colossal untruths, and they would not believe that others could have the impudence to distort the truth so infamously. Even though the facts―which prove this to be so [prove it to be a lie]―may be brought clearly to their minds, they will still doubt and waver and will continue to think that there may be some other explanation [meaning that they will doubt the true facts that prove the lie to be a lie―and will still believe the lie to be true in some way]. For the grossly impudent lie always leaves traces behind it [meaning that it sticks and remains], even after it has been nailed down, a fact which is known to all expert liars in this world and to all who conspire together in the art of lying.” (Adolf Hitler, Mein Kampf, vol. I, ch. X).

Joseph Goebbels, Hitler’s Minister of Propaganda for the Nazi German government, is attributed with having written the following: “If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it. The lie can be maintained only for such time as the State can shield the people from the political, economic and/or military consequences of the lie. It thus becomes vitally important for the State to use all of its powers to repress dissent, for the truth is the mortal enemy of the lie, and thus by extension, the truth is the greatest enemy of the State.”

Goebbels also wrote the following paragraph about the English―in an article dated January 12th, 1941, entitled Aus Churchills Lügenfabrik (English: “From Churchill's Lie Factory”) was published in Die Zeit ohne Beispiel.

“The essential English leadership secret does not depend on particular intelligence. Rather, it depends on a remarkably stupid thick-headedness. The English follow the principle that when one lies, one should lie big, and stick to it. They keep up their lies, even at the risk of looking ridiculous.”

The Coronavirus Propaganda is a Con-All-A-Virus Propaganda
Professor Dr.Tim Levine―B.S. and Ph.D in psychology―of the University of Alabama, Birmingham―author of the books: Books: Duped: Truth-Default Theory and the Social Science of Lying and Deception―has spent decades researching the truth-lie phenomenon. He is of the opinion that few people can detect a liar. Even those whose job is to conduct interviews to dig out hidden truths, such as police officers or intelligence agents, are no better than ordinary folk. Levine argues that people to assume that others are telling the truth. Most communication by most people is truthful most of the time, so a presumption of honesty is usually justified. Humans are hard-wired to assume that what they hear is true—and therefore, says Mr. Levine, they are also automatically hard-wired to be duped.

So strong is that instinct that people suspend their critical faculties when given orders by a superior--think here of the orders given by Dr. Fauci, the CDC and all the other governmental officials. A study published last year in Science, a journal, concluded that “falsehood diffused significantly farther, faster, deeper and more broadly than the truth” and that this effect was especially strong for fake political news.

Make the lie big but keep it vague! Keep away from precise details that can be easily checked and debunked. That is the tactic of both Modernists and Liberals within the Church, as well as godless, untruthful politicians throughout the world. If you are vague and give few details, then you are harder to nail down. Above all, keep repeating the propaganda and have others repeat it for you! Lies, when they are repeated by many people, add even more credibility to lie. This is exactly what Dr. Anthony Fauci and his staff and supporters have been doing with the Coronavirus Crisis and Pandemic (or Plandemic). Renowned scientists and doctors throughout the world―especially those whose expertise is in epidemiology and viruses―have disputed Fauci’s statements and claims, they have criticized, refuted and “called-out” Fauci and crew. They have challenged Fauci to a proper scientific discussion with evidence and proofs to be put on the table―but, of course, Fauci and crew (Bill Gates among them) keep silent and ignore such statements, invitations and challenges. Why? Because as Joseph Goebbels, Hitler’s Minister of Propaganda for the Nazi German government, wrote: “The lie can be maintained only for such time as the State can shield the people from the political, economic and/or military consequences of the lie. It thus becomes vitally important for the State to use all of its powers to repress dissent, for the truth is the mortal enemy of the lie, and thus by extension, the truth is the greatest enemy of the State.”

Article 15
W.H.O. says what? Who says W.H.O. is wrong? W.H.O. says W.H.O. is right! Who do you believe? Do you believe W.H.O.?
Who’s W.H.O.? Who is behind W.H.O.?

Who's WHO? What Do You Know About WHO?
Everyone has “two-faces” so to speak―a side that we want the world to know and a side that we do NOT want the world to know about. The same can be said about larger entities―such as families, organizations and governments, for example. To know WHO (the World Health Organization) it is important to know something of WHO’s family, WHO’s ‘parents’ and with whom WHO mixes and “rubs shoulders”, as well as who finances WHO.

WHO is a Child of the Big Daddy UN
The DNA of WHO is the same DNA as that of UN (the United Nations). It is a “child” of the UN along with several other “children”. The main organs or “children” of the UN are the General Assembly, the Security Council, the Economic and Social Council, the Trusteeship Council, the International Court of Justice, and the UN Secretariat. All were established in 1945 when the UN was founded. WHO (the World Health Organization) was born later―in 1948.

Every effect has a cause. Every child has a father. People often seek out and study their own “Family Tree”. It is also interesting to follow the “Family Tree” of the WHO to see where it leads. In doing so, you will see that there is a close connection between the WHO (World Health Organization) with the UN (United Nations), the League of Nations, the New World Order and a One World Government. The League of Nations was the precursor of the United Nations―and the United Nations is the “John the Baptist” or precursor of the “Modern Messias”―the New World Order and the One World Government.

The League of Nations
The League of Nations, founded in January of 1920, was the first worldwide inter-governmental organization. Its main mission was to maintain world peace after the 1914-1918 First World War. U.S. President Woodrow Wilson won the Nobel Peace Prize for his role as the leading architect of the League―even though the United States did not join the league. The primary goals of the League of Nations included―preventing wars through collective security and disarmament and settling international disputes through negotiation and arbitration. Other issues in this and related treaties included labor conditions; just treatment of native inhabitants; human and drug trafficking; the arms trade; global health; prisoners of war; and protection of minorities in Europe. At its peak―September 1934 to February 1935―it had 58 member countries. The credibility of the organization was weakened by the fact that the United States never joined the League (for the Senate voted against President Wilson’s desire to join) and the Soviet Union joined late and was soon expelled after invading Finland. Germany withdrew from the League, as did Japan, Italy, Spain and others. The outbreak of the Second World War showed that the League had failed its primary purpose―which was to prevent any future world war. The League lasted for 26 years. The United Nations (UN) replaced it after the end of the Second World War and inherited several agencies and organizations founded by the League.

The United Nations
The earliest concrete plan for a new world organization, to replace the ineffective League of Nations, began under the aegis of the US State Department in 1939. By June of 1941, representatives of the United Kingdom, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, the Union of South Africa, and of the exiled governments of Belgium, Czechoslovakia, Greece, Luxembourg, Netherlands, Norway, Poland, and Yugoslavia, as well as a representative of General de Gaulle of France, met in London and signed the Declaration of St. James's Palace. This was the first of six conferences that led up to the founding of the United Nations and the Charter of the United Nations.

U.S. President Franklin Roosevelt first suggested using the name United Nations, to refer to the Allies of World War II, to British Prime Minister Winston Churchill during the latter's three-week visit to the White House in December 1941. Interestingly―though not surprisingly―both Roosevelt and Churchill were Freemasons.

President Franklin D. Roosevelt (1882–1945) was initiated into Freemasonry on October 11th, 1911 in the Holland Lodge No. 8, of New York City. He was made Honorary Grand Master of the Order of DeMolay on April 13th, 1934. One particular quote of his is very revealing. In May of 1941, he said: “You know―I am a juggler and I never let my right hand know what my left hand does. I'm perfectly willing to mislead and tell untruths.” Spoken like a true politician and Freemason!

Winston S. Churchill had a family history of Masonic membership, as well as many Mason friends. He was initiated into the Studholme Lodge No. 1591 on May 24th, 1901. By 1912, he was well on the way political success and fame. He was also appointed Lord Admiral of the British Fleet in readiness for a potential attack by Germany. His multitude of commitments led him to reluctantly cease attending Masonic meetings, but he continued his membership and in later years, whenever his involvement in Masonic affairs was sought, he willingly participated.

The text of the “Declaration of United Nations” was drafted by U.S. President Franklin D. Roosevelt, British Prime Minister Winston Churchill, and Roosevelt aide Harry Hopkins, while meeting at the White House in December of 1941. It incorporated Soviet suggestions, but left no role for France. The first official use of the term “United Nations” was in January of 1942―when 26 Governments signed the Declaration. By early 1945 it had been signed by 21 more states.

The Original United Nations Declaration
A Joint Declaration by the United States Of America, the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics, China, Australia, Belgium, Canada, Costa Rica, Cuba, Czechoslovakia, Dominican Republic, El Salvador, Greece, Guatemala, Haiti, Honduras, India, Luxembourg, Netherlands, New Zealand, Nicaragua, Norway, Panama, Poland, South Africa, Yugoslavia.

The Governments signatory hereto,
Having subscribed to a common program of purposes and principles embodied in the Joint Declaration of the President of the United States of America and the Prime Minister of Great Britain dated August 14th, 1941, known as the Atlantic Charter,

Being convinced that complete victory over their enemies is essential to defend life, liberty, independence and religious freedom, and to preserve human rights and justice in their own lands as well as in other lands, and that they are now engaged in a common struggle against savage and brutal forces seeking to subjugate the world,

DECLARE:
(1) Each Government pledges itself to employ its full resources, military or economic, against those members of the Tripartite Pact and its adherents with which such government is at war.
(2) Each Government pledges itself to cooperate with the Governments signatory hereto and not to make a separate armistice or peace with the enemies.

The foregoing declaration may be adhered to by other nations which are, or which may be, rendering material assistance and contributions in the struggle for victory over Hitlerism.

First UN Meetings
U.S. President Franklin D. Roosevelt considered his most important legacy the creation of the United Nations, making a permanent organization out of the wartime Alliance of the same name. He was the chief promoter of the United Nations idea. Roosevelt had been a strong supporter of the League of Nations back in 1919–1920, but was determined to avoid the mistakes Woodrow Wilson had made. The United Nations was Roosevelt’s (a Democrat) highest postwar priority. He insisted on full coordination with the Republican leadership. He made sure that leading Republicans were on board.

In April 1945, the United Nations Conference on International Organization began in San Francisco. In addition to Governments, a number of non-government organizations, including Rotary International and Lions Clubs International received invitations to assist in the drafting of a charter. Interestingly enough, Freemasons were founding members of both the Rotary Club and the Lions Club.

After working for two months, the fifty nations―that were represented at the conference―signed the Charter of the United Nations in June, 1945. The first meeting of the General Assembly was held in Westminster Central Hall, London, on January 10th, 1946. The Security Council met for the first time a week later in Church House, Westminster. The League of Nations formally dissolved itself several months later, on April 18th, 1946, and transferred its mission to the United Nations.

The World Health Organization
The World Health Organization (WHO) is a specialized agency of the United Nations responsible for international public health. The agency is part of the United Nations Sustainable Development Group. The World Health Organization was not a new idea―it incorporated the assets, personnel, and duties of, and was a continuation of, the League of Nations Health Organization, while also incorporating the Office International d'Hygiène Publique, and the International Classification of Diseases.

During the 1945 United Nations Conference on International Organization, a delegate from the Republic of China, conferred with Norwegian and Brazilian delegates on creating an international health organization under the auspices of the new United Nations. After failing to get a resolution passed on the subject, the Secretary General of the conference, recommended using a declaration to establish such an organization. The Chinese delegate and other delegates lobbied and a declaration passed calling for an international conference on health. The use of the word “world”― rather than just “international”―emphasized the truly global nature of what the organization was seeking to achieve. The constitution of the World Health Organization was signed by all 51 countries of the United Nations, and by 10 other countries, in July of 1946. It thus became the first specialized agency of the United Nations to which every member subscribed. Its constitution formally came into force in April of 1948, when it was ratified by the 26th member state.

Its work began in real earnest in 1951, following a significant infusion of financial and technical resources. The WHO's broad mandate includes advocating for universal healthcare, monitoring public health risks, coordinating responses to health emergencies, and promoting human health and well being. It provides technical assistance to countries, sets international health standards and guidelines, and collects data on global health issues through the World Health Survey. Its flagship publication, the World Health Report, provides assessments of global health topics and health statistics on all nations. The WHO also serves as a forum for summits and discussions on health issues.

Who’s Friends with WHO?
If you want to know about the influences over WHO, then you cannot go far wrong by adhering to the principle of “Follow the Money!” The WHO relies on assessed and voluntary contributions from member states and private donors for funding. At the end of 2018, it had a budget of over $4.2 billion, most of which comes from voluntary contributions from member states. In recent years, there has been a growing debate about what role independent persons and foundations should play in global health governance generally, and particularly vis-à-vis the World Health Organization (WHO). Much of this discussion revolves around today’s gargantuan philanthropy, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, and its hold and sway over the agenda and modus operandi of global health. Yet that is nothing new in the history of WHO. The Rockefeller Foundation, the uncontested health philanthropy heavyweight of the 20th century, both profoundly shaped WHO and maintained long and complex relations with it, even as both institutions changed over time.

The United Nations―the Precursor to the New World Order
You can look at whatever nation you want, you can look at whatever government you want, or any organization you want―even though they be of different races, colors and creeds, it all comes down to these words of Our Lord: “He that is not with Me, is against Me: and he that gathereth not with Me, scattereth!” (Matthew 12:30; Luke 11:23). We are either for or against Our Lord, for or against God―there is no middle ground, there are no neutral spectators: No man can serve two masters. For either he will hate the one, and love the other―or he will sustain the one, and despise the other. You cannot serve God and mammon!” (Matthew 6:19-24). You could substitute the word “Satan” for the word “mammon”―for Satan is the prince of this world and all the “mammon” in it, that is to say all the treasures and pleasures which he uses to ensnare and chain souls. And chained they are―because most people would find it harder to live without treasured pleasures of preference, than live without God. Those pleasures and treasures take up ten times, or twenty times, or even hundred times more of their attention, time and love than what they allocate to God.

For Christ or Against Christ―Christian or Antichrist
As Holy Scripture warns: “You have heard that Antichrist cometh, even now there are become many Antichrists: whereby we know that it is the last hour!” (1 John 2:18). “Who is a liar―but he who denieth that Jesus is the Christ? This is Antichrist, who denieth the Father, and the Son.” (1 John 2:22). “Every spirit that dissolveth Jesus, is not of God: and this is Antichrist, of whom you have heard that he cometh” (1 John 4:3). “Many seducers are gone out into the world, who confess not that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh―this is a seducer and an Antichrist” (2 John 1:7).

How, then, do we know if we are for or against God? The very basic beginners qualification for being “on God’s side” is the keeping of His commandments: “If you love Me, keep My commandments” (John 14:15) … “He that hath My commandments, and keepeth them; he it is that loveth Me. And he that loveth Me, shall be loved of My Father: and I will love him, and will manifest Myself to him” (John 14:21) … “If any one love Me, he will keep My word, and My Father will love him, and We will come to him, and will make Our abode with him” (John 14:23) … “He that loveth Me not, keepeth not My words” (John 14:24) ... “You are My friends, if you do the things that I command you” (John 15:14) … “If you keep My commandments, you shall abide in My love; as I also have kept My Father’s commandments, and do abide in His love” (John 15:10).

Those words apply, not only to individuals, but also nations and organizations―both great and small. If you look at all the nations of world, even the so-called ‘Catholic’ nations, you will see that each and every one of them have progressively turned their backs on the commandments and words of God. They actually promote and legislate for the very opposite. Hence you see the widespread acceptance of contraception, abortion, divorce, remarriage after divorce, ‘common-law’ marriages which is a euphemism for living in sin, in-vitro fertilization which uses masturbation, same sex marriages, homosexual liaisons, immodesty, pornography, euthanasia, Satanism and the occult, financial exploitation, civilized murder (which we see right now with the playing around with bio-weapons designed to kill), etc., etc. “Of which I foretell you, as I have foretold to you, that they who do such things shall not obtain the Kingdom of God!” (Galatians 5:21).

According to an analysis released on January 3rd, 2019, by the Pew Research Center, about 88% of Congress identifies as Christian. Of the 96 newly elected members of Congress, 78 are Christian, including 28 who are Catholic. Overall, there are 141 Catholics in the House, of Representatives or 32% of the 435 members of which 382 belong to one Christian denomination or another (Catholicism included). In the Senate, 22 of the 100 U.S. senators are Catholic. So with this overwhelmingly ‘Christian’ majority―where are the Laws of Christ and God? Why do the laws passed by these ‘Christians’ allow contraception, abortion, divorce, remarriage after divorce, ‘common-law’ marriages which is a euphemism for living in sin, in-vitro fertilization which uses masturbation, same sex marriages, homosexual liaisons, immodesty, pornography, euthanasia, Satanism and the occult, financial exploitation, civilized murder (which we see right now with the playing around with bio-weapons designed to kill), etc., etc.? The truth is that Christ is only given “lip-service” ― which politicians are very good at! Nobody really wants the Social Reign of Christ, or the Social Order of Christ―they would prefer to create a New World Order.

New World Order
The whole set-up, or modus-operandi, or thread that runs through the plans for a New World Order, is not based on Christ, but upon purely secular, materialistic, humanitarian principles that shove Christ to one side. Hey! Who is it that made the world? Who is it that governs the world by His Providence? It is, of course, Christ: “In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. All things were made by Him and without Him was made nothing that was made. In Him was life, and the life was the light of men. And the Light shineth in darkness, and the darkness did not comprehend it” (John 1:1-5).

Instead of bowing before God and letting Him rule through His Law, “the kings of the Earth stood up, and the princes met together, against the Lord and against His Christ, [saying]: ‘Let us break Their bonds asunder―and let us cast away their yoke from us!’” (Psalm 2:2-3).

Article 16
Coronavirus Pandemic or Conspiracy Plannedemic?

Since this is will be a very long article
THE LATEST ENTRIES WILL BE POSTED IN RED

In this article, we shall summarize the events thus far―to enable us to have a clearer and even more truthful view of the lies, exaggerations, machinations, calculations, demoralization and destabilization that has gone on in this patently obvious globally coordinated Con-all-avirus plannedemic. To dismiss all this criticism as a “Conspiracy Theory” is a “Lunacy Theory” that shows symptom of the “Insanity Virus” or “Blind-as-a-Bat Virus” that seems to have infected, twisted, confused and deranged most rational minds. Maybe the virus of being as blind-as-a-bat comes actually comes from a real bat―just like the official narrative says for the Coronavirus COVID-19! When faced with evidence that is contrary to and disproves the official Coronavirus narrative that they insanely believe, all they are able to do is to chirp like a stupid parrot, saying: “Conspiracy Theory! Conspiracy Theory! Conspiracy Theory!” while they cling to their insanity and total lack of evidence that is needed to prove that they insanely believe the propaganda narrative that has been rolled-out for the type of person whom Communists like to call “Useful Idiots”―and there we come back full circle to their insanity.

The Propaganda, the Cover-ups, the Lies, the Exaggerations, the Misinformation, the Misrepresentation

► LIE ― Cover-Up and Lies about the Origins of the Coronavirus

DR. RASHID BUTTAR, an American doctor, who, for the past 20 years has been ranked among the top 50 doctors in the United States, graduated from Washington University with major in Biology, before attending the Medical School of Osteopathic Medicine Health Sciences and the College of Medicine and Surgery. He trained in General Surgery and Emergency Medicine and served as Brigade Surgeon and Director of Emergency Medicine while serving in the US Army. He served with 5th Special Forces, with the 2nd Infantry Division, with the 101st Air Assault Division―attached to these units as a doctor. He is Board Certified Member of Metaltoxicology and Preventative Medicine. He is Board eligible in Emergency Medicine and has achieved Fellowship status in three separate Medical Societies. Today he serves as the Director of the Center for Advanced Medicine with clinics in California and North Carolina. These clinics specialize in needs of patients with immune dysfunctions and toxicity issues. Regarding this Coronavirus pandemic, he says:

“I have patients from all over the world and many were asking about it (Coronavirus) … When I started looking at this, I thought―this does make any sense! As I started looking at this information, I started seeing that this is actually a chimeric (not natural) version―something that was developed here, in the United States, in 2015. It was published in Nature magazine that it was developed in the University of North Carolina―where all the initial studies were done.
The chimeric research was done despite having a moratorium (a temporary prohibition of an activity) by the US Government to prevent any chimeric research.”

“Chimeric research means taking a naturally occurring virus and then mutating it, modifying it, changing the configuration morphologically to “gain function.” It’s called a “gain of function study” or “gain of function research” ― which means they are taking something that already has potential to cause harm and making it more harmful and making it more virulent and making it more resistant ― and basically that is what I found. They took the sHZ-014 strain of the Coronavirus as a basic component, they then brought in the backbone from the SARS Coronavirus and put them together. They then inserted HIV and MERS orthologs (genes) on top of it to make a more virulent and more detrimental virus.”

Dr. Buttar confirmed that after the moratorium (a temporary prohibition of an activity) was placed, $3.7 million from the National Institute of Health was transferred to China so that they could continue this research―even though the moratorium had prohibited the research, so that they basically outsourced the research to China. Dr. Buttar elaborates, saying:

“It goes back 2014, when the US Government decided―based upon certain virologists at that time saying: ‘Look, there is no justification for this kind of research. There is potential for it to cause harm and cause a pandemic. So there is no justification for us to do this kind of research. So the Government passed a moratorium (a temporary prohibition of an activity) in 2014. [Dr. Anthony] Fauci approved a budget for monies to be sectioned for this type of research. He basically broke the law. He more than broke the law―this entire casket that we see with the world shutdown―was created by this initial aspect back in 2015. He broke the law. He went against the Government moratorium. He took taxpayer money and he funded research that has now led to Covid-19.

“In 2017, he documented and Georgetown University as saying that there will be a pandemic that this [Trump’s] presidency will face. How did he know, back in 2017, that something was going to happen in 2018, 2019, or 2020. How could he predict it? You can’t predict the [financial] market and what’s going to happen three days from today! How did he know there was going to be a pandemic? He stated that this president WILL face a pandemic! My point is that when somebody starts making these kinds of statements―and they were involved with the breaking of the law to fund the research that American taxpayers were being made to pay for in Wuhan―and now trying to create this diversion and say that was China.

“Dr. Shiva [Ph.D. in biological engineering from MIT in systems biology who is now running for Senate] has said that Fauci should be fired! I think that this is the nicest thing that could be done to Fauci. He is a criminal. He has broken the law. He is going against the Government. To me that seems like it is a traitorous thing to do when the Government has passed a regulation and he is in one of the highest levels in the NIH (National Institute of Health―he has a Directorship in the NIH and then he breaks the law, he breaks the moratorium and then funds research for something that could potentially cause harm throughout the entire world; and he is in collusion with a foreign government! I don’t know―that is matter for attorneys to decide! But I will tell you something―Fauci goes back to 1981. Back then, he called HIV the “gay disease” and he was the one that funded the research behind a drug three years before it was established that there was a real virus―the virus was established in 1984. In 1981 he was pushing the agenda of a drug, prophylactically to treat people―for a condition that is now seen to be related to lifestyle, to nutrition status, to a whole host of different things―he was pushing an agenda to push a drug which caused so much harm. This goes back 39 years! This guy has a history of pushing an agenda.”

DR. JUDY MIKOVITS, has a Ph.D. in biochemistry and molecular biology. She joined the National Institute of Health in 1980 as a Postdoctoral Scholar in Molecular Virology and began a 20-year collaboration with Frank Ruscetti, a pioneer in the field of human retro virology. On the matter of the origins of COVID-19, Dr. Mikovits says:: "I wouldn’t use the word created [for COVID-19]. But you can’t say “naturally occurring” if it was by way of the laboratory. So it’s very clear this virus was manipulated. This family of viruses was manipulated and studied in a laboratory where the animals were taken into the laboratory, and this is what was released, whether deliberate or not. That cannot be naturally occurring. Somebody didn’t go to a market, get a bat; the virus didn’t jump directly to humans. That’s not how it works. That’s accelerated viral evolution. If it was a natural occurrence, it would take up to 800 years to occur. This occurred from SARS-1 within a decade. That’s not naturally occurring. I’m sure it occurred between the North Carolina laboratories, Fort Detrick, the U.S. Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases, and the Wuhan laboratory.."

DR. FRANCIS BOYLE—who has a degree from the University of Chicago, a juris doctor (lawyer) degree from Harvard and a Ph.D. in political science—called for bio-warfare legislation at the Biological Weapons Convention of 1972, and drafted the Biological Weapons Anti-Terrorism Act of 1989. For decades Dr. Boyle has advocated against the development and use of bio-weapons, which he suspects COVID-19 is. As a result of Boyle’s anti-biological warfare work, which goes back to the early days of the Reagan administration — a time in which they were using DNA genetic engineering to manufacture biological weapons — Boyle has carefully followed “mysterious outbreaks of disease in both humans and animals around the world” that have appeared since then. He shares his theory of the origin of this novel Coronavirus.

Dr. Boyle explains: “My Biological Weapons Anti-Terrorism Act was specifically designed to not only to deal with regular biological weapons, but also with DNA genetic engineering for biological weapons that was just coming into its infancy when the Biological Weapons Convention was being drafted. When these unexplained mysterious illnesses break out, I monitor them a while and usually I just conclude they can be explained by normal reasons: lack of sanitation, poverty, things of that nature. But in Wuhan it seemed pretty suspicious to me. There is this Bio-Safety Level 4 facility there in Wuhan. It’s the first in China, and it was specifically set up to deal with the Coronavirus and SARS. SARS is basically a weaponized version of the Coronavirus. There have been leaks before of SARS out of this facility, and indeed the only reason for these BSL-4 facilities, based on my experience, is the research, development, testing and stockpiling of offensive biological weapons.

When asked about rumors the COVID-19 virus might have been stolen from a high-security laboratory in Winnipeg, Canada, Dr. Boyle says: “It could have been. I want to make it clear that, in my opinion they were already working on that at the Wuhan BSL-4 facility. They were working on a biological warfare weapon involving SARS, which is a Coronavirus to begin with.We do know that Dr. [Yoshihiro] Kawaoka at the University of Wisconsin … resurrected the Spanish flu virus for the Pentagon, obviously for weapons purposes, and he specializes in mating the Spanish flu virus to all sorts of hideous bio-warfare instrumentalities. And there was a record of him shipping his products to Winnipeg. Winnipeg is Canada’s equivalent of our own Fort Detrick (Maryland, USA). It’s a BSL-4 facility, and yes, they research, develop tests, manufacture and stockpile every type of hideous biological warfare weapon that we know of. So, some of this technology could have been stolen from Winnipeg. I don’t know about that but, as I said, the Wuhan BSL-4 was already working on this to begin with. They had already developed SARS. SARS had leaked out two to three times before this, and it seems they were turbo-charging SARS, which is what [COVID-19] looks to be. This is a brand-new generation of bio-warfare weapons we haven’t seen before.”

DR. CHRIS MARTENSON ― is a trained American scientist a Ph.D in Pathology from Duke University, where he specialized in Toxicology. He has carried out research in the field of biochemistry , neurotoxicology , applied pharmacology and in vitro techniques . Dr. Martenson says: “The evidence is becoming clearer and clearer that SARS-COV2 (the Coronavirus or COVID-19) is a human made creation―it looks like it came from a lab ... If you are a journalist, then I am going to tell the question you need to be asking about this. A Newsweek article says that Dr. Fauci had controversially backed a Wuhan lab with millions of US dollars for risky Coronavirus research. This is called “Gain of Function” research, where they are taking viruses that lack the ability to infect humans and experimenting on them to see if they can get them to infect more infectiously … and have more virulent and damaging effects on the body. That “Gain of Function” research was going on ― they [the establishment scientists] say ― with intention to see if any knowledge can be gained on how to combat such a virus more effectively if it were to ever transmit to humans. The truth is I have never seen a single [scientific] paper that talks about how we have gained any knowledge that would help us battle this particular virus or any of the other ones. The focus seems to be more on how we can―intellectually, professionally― ‘monkey’ with these viruses and do something with them.

“The story is now developing that this came from a lab … We see Mike Pompeo, the US Secretary of State, saying there is enormous evidence that the Coronavirus came from a Chinese lab. Hmm! Yes, but the funding for that lab came from the United States―so I am not sure there are any “clean shirts” in this particular story. To understand the science behind all this―which it is really important to understand―we have to take a little journey down into Virology. It has always been described that the way that the COVID-19 virus gets into a cell is that it binds to a receptor. The official statement is that ‘"SARS-COV-2 is unlikely to have evolved from the MERS, HCoV-HRC1, and so on. From the currently available sequences in databases, it is difficult for us to find the source. Perhaps there are still many evolutionary intermediate sequences waiting to be discovered.’" Let me decode that last sentence for you―they are throwing their hands up, going: ‘Err, there has to be some ‘magic’ that occurs between the closest relative we know to SARS-COV-2 and SARS-COV-2 itself―there’s some “magic” that happens between there and there!’

“In the Coronavirus family tree … SARS-COV-2 is way out on its own and doesn’t have any other virus related to it or close to it in its family tree … That is quite an oddity! A real mystery! It is presented by these people as: ‘O yeah! There it is! All there lurking by itself, way out there―SARS-COV-2! … It looks like it came out of a bat, but maybe it had some time in a pangolin [insect-eating mammal]’ … [Dr. Martenson rejects this fake science, saying]: Comparing the genetic sequences … there isn’t a mutation … it is completely missing. So we have to talk about something that is very important and part of this ‘smoking-gun’ story―the difference between a mutation and an insert ... [Certain] world-leading scientists in virology, in an article published in Nature Medicine, say: ‘We offer perspective on the notable features of the SARS-COV-2 genome and discuss scenarios by which they could have arisen. Our analyses clearly show that SARS-COV-2 is not a laboratory construct or purposefully manipulated virus.’ They even show in chart the [incriminating] sequence [that indicates the presence of an insertion and not a mutation] ― You have to explain where that insert came from, because whole inserts are not part of the mutation pathway. Have people been ‘monkeying around’ with this? Yes! … Again and again! The Chinese in 2006 … the Dutch in 2008 … the Americans in 2009 … etc., etc. It is huge, huge line of research that has been going on for a very long time. The most recent work of this kind that I came across was an October 2019 [scientific] paper from several Beijing [China] labs, where the [damaging sequence] was inserted into an actual live chicken Coronavirus―infectious bronchitis virus (IBV). This kind of stuff has been going on for a long time! …

“So it was odd for me to see one of America’s leading virologists―Dr. Michael Osterholm―when he asked: “Is there any chance that this came out of a lab?’―and Michael gave an answer where he said: ‘We could not have crafted a virus like this to do what it’s doing―I mean we don’t have the creative imagination or the skill set!’ Hmm! [On the contrary, says Dr. Martenson] Yes we do! We have got the skill set! We’ve been ‘monkeying around’ with this stuff for a long time―[Doctor] Michael [Osterholm] knows this better than anybody―he is one of the leading virologists out there! That is dissembling on his part. Furthermore, he said: ‘Well it looks like this thing probably comes from a pangolin” [But he makes no mention of the blatantly obvious insert of the damaging “Gain of Function” sequence] … These sorts of inserts have been ‘monkeyed with’ over and over again by scientists seeking to understand why viruses do what they do. He [Dr. Michael Osterholm] says we don’t have the skill set―but clearly we have these capabilities, because here is a group [in a scientific paper published on May 4th, 2020, show that] they used a synthetic genomics platform, and, only a week after receiving the synthetic DNA fragments, they were able to engineer and resurrect chemically synthetized clones of SARS-COV-2 … Using an artificial yeast model, they were able to generate infectious RNA. They rebuilt the virus out of fragments! So to say: ‘We just don’t have the skill sets for this stuff!’ ― NOT TRUE! Because we actually do have those skill sets!

“I think we are getting a real ‘circling of the wagons’ here! Scientists are tired of explaining why the Coronavirus was not made in a lab. In an April 20th, 2020, ScienceAlert.com article we read: ‘It’s a rumor that just won’t die! When asked whether the COVID-19 virus was genetically engineered in a lab, scientists have already said “No!” rather firmly―but the matter of the new Coronavirus origin is unlikely to be put to rest so easily. Back in March, we covered a study published in “Nature Medicine”, in which the researchers investigated the genomic data of SARS-COV-2, particularly the receptor-binding domain sections of the virus ― to try and discover how it mutated into the virulent and deadly version we are currently struggling to contain. As a by-product of their research, they were able to determine that SARS-COV-2 was not genetically manipulated. One of researchers, Scripps Research Immunologist, Kristian Anderson [perhaps a descendant of the famous fairy-tale author, Hans Christian Andersen?) said at the time: “By comparing the available genome sequence data for known Coronavirus strains, we can firmly determine that SARS-COV-2 originated through natural process.”

Dr. Martenson says: “How can that be? How can you determine that? You look at certain technologies and there are people in labs who have created entire genomes of various viruses without any ‘signatures’ ― which are like the ‘digital thumbprint’ that you might find when you are doing computer forensics. There are some labs that been able to fully recreate viruses with no alterations, without any tell-tale fingerprints. So you cannot determine that it was not genetically manipulated just by looking at the genome. So this crap what they are saying―pure crap! … When we look at the genomic data―what do we find? We find that SARS-COV-2 is all by itself, in its own family tree! I don’t know how that virologist can even say that―that this thing is of natural origins! Really? Where did it get that [insert] from? Not from its [Coronavirus] neighbors! Not from any of its closest relatives! So that’s a little bit of a ‘hop-skip-and-a-jump!’ Do you know what the smoking-gun is? It is that [inserted] PRRA (polybasic furin cleavage site) ― which somehow came out of nowhere and was parked in there and―O by the way―just happens to where all there Coranavirus “Gain of Function” virologists ‘monkey around’ all the time. So I would say―even though I am not a world-leading virologist―I cannot see that there is any case to be made for [natural origins] ― we have a giant insert here, that gives this thing its “Gain of Function”. The press needs to ask one question and no others until this is answered: “How did that polybasic furin cleavage site, PRRA [the insert] get into COVID-19?” I am very disappointed with the dissembling and overt lying and “cover your ass” behavior of what appears to be a significant portion of the US virology community. Both the US and China are up their virologist eyeballs in this story!”

Yet the propaganda narrative strenuously and vehemently denies and scoffs and ridicules the theory that the Coronavirus COVID-19 originated in a laboratory — adamantly and doggedly sticking to the theory that it jumped onto a person from a bat somewhere in China’s Wuhan Sea Food Market. Then they changed their “scientific fairy tale” script to saying that the virus jumped from a bat onto some other animal before jumping onto a human being!!! The Walt Disney organization had better get that script into their hands and patented quick! It has all the right ingredients for a Walt Disney comedy cartoon! Maybe he should also sign up the “scientific kooks” as actors — for they have done a very good job in acting out the “fairy tale” so far!

► LIE ― Truth on the Severity of COVID-19

Just like a liar under interrogation, whose lying story shows inconsistencies and contradictions, which then leads to a whole pile of new lies to cover-up the existing lies―likewise have the lies on the severity of COVID-19 fathered a whole family of lies and liars in order to try and keep up the propaganda about COVID-19 being so deadly. Now lies can seem truthful to those people who have lost the power and skill of critical thinking and analysis. These people believe all that they hear and are told―and, if you repeat a lie often enough (as is the case in brainwashing techniques, both in wartime and peacetime), then that incessant, unending, inescapable barrage of lies eventually breaks through the logical barrier and logical resistance of the prisoner or citizen and has them finally accepting the lie as truth. Never before in living history has such a worldwide fear-mongering lie been rammed down the throats of the dumbed-down population, even transforming critical thinkers into “useful idiots.”

The general policy over the last 4 months has been one of ramming and cramming half-truths, exaggerations, simulations and downright lies into the minds of a gullible, scientifically and medically uneducated public, while systematically ostracizing, ridiculing, silencing and even threatening those scientists and doctors of highest repute, who dare to challenge and contradict the “Disney fairy-tale” narrative that has been spread universally with an alarming force and consistency―even when it clearly defied human logic.

Science―in an increasingly godless world―has taken the place of God. Science has rapidly become the new religion of a neo-pagan world. Science―stepping out of the limits of its scope of operations―now postulates that there is no God, and have replaced God with the “Big-Bang Theory” and its successive Evolution. Man―or the scientist―has become a god unto himself, and science is the religion which he preaches. Yet, in his folly and conceit, the scientist forgets that his newly enthroned god ― which is his science ― can only work upon, experiment upon, and measure the measurable. This means that the scientist is restricted, in the general sense, to the material and has no way of measuring the immaterial, which is the spiritual. God is a spirit and thus He is beyond the reach and scope of science ― yet the scientist, in his pride, refuses to accept the existence of anything that cannot be measured and analyzed by science! There are, of course, some Christian scientists who admit and abide by the restrictions and limits of science, but these are fewer and fewer in number in comparison to the even increasing legions of godless scientists.

What this is leading to is the inevitable consequence of ignoring, or abandoning, or rejecting God―Who is Truth itself: “I am the way, and the truth, and the life. No man cometh to the Father, but by Me” (John 14:6). Once you ignore Christ/God, then it is only natural that you will ignore, abandon or reject the truth―and, like Pontius Pilate, you will sarcastically say: “What is truth?” (John 18:38). Today―in this mainly godless world―truth no longer matters. Truth is there to be manipulated, twisted, exaggerated, understated, twisted, or even hidden―all for personal advantage, financial gain or acquisition of power and then the maintenance of those things. Once you side with the lie, then you side with devil―the father of lies and the opponent of truth. To such persons, Our Lord says: “You are of your father the devil, and the desires of your father you will do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and he stood not in the truth; because truth is not in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own―for he is a liar, and the father of lies!” (John 8:44).

This Coronavirus Plannedemic has clearly manifested the fact that the official narrative has all the various ingredients of lying― there are truths that are manipulated, twisted, exaggerated, understated, twisted and hidden. As Our Lord said: “Beware of false prophets [scientists, doctors and government officials], who come to you in the clothing of sheep, but inwardly they are ravening wolves. By their fruits you shall know them. Do men gather grapes of thorns, or figs of thistles? Even so every good tree [tree of truth] bringeth forth good fruit [of truth], and the evil tree [untruthful tree] bringeth forth evil fruit [lies, exaggerations, half-truths, etc]. A good tree cannot bring forth evil fruit, neither can an evil tree bring forth good fruit. Every tree that bringeth not forth good fruit, shall be cut down, and shall be cast into the fire. Wherefore by their fruits [lies or truths] you shall know them!” (Matthew 7:15-20).

DR. KNUT WITTKOWSKI, was at the Rockefeller University for 20 years as Head of the Department of Biostatistics Epidemiology and Research Design, and before that, he worked for 15 years with Dr. Klaus Dietz, one of the leading epidemiologists in the world, in the in the Eberhard Karls University in Tubingen, Germany. He now resides in New York City. In a recent interview, Dr. Wittkosski criticized the way in which the governments are dealing with the COVID-19 Pandemic. When asked: “What do you say to people who just say, ‘We just didn’t know about the lethality of this virus and it was the smartest thing to do, to do what we did, and contain everybody, because we just didn’t have the data!’”

Dr. Wittkowski replied: “We had two other SARS viruses before. Or, Coronaviruses. It’s not the first Coronavirus that comes out, and it won’t be the last. And for all respiratory diseases, we have the same type of an epidemic. If you leave it alone, it comes for two weeks, it peaks, and it goes for two weeks and it’s gone.”

The interviewer then asked: “During the press briefing yesterday, Fauci, and the President, and the rest of the people assembled, were saying that, had they not done the containment strategy that they have done, that upwards of 2 million people would have died in the United States. What do you think of that figure?”

Dr. Wittkowski replied: “Well, I’m not paid by the government―so I’m entitled to actually do science. If the government, if there had been no intervention, the epidemic would have been over, like every other respiratory disease epidemic … Let’s take realistic numbers in the United Sates―we have about 25,000 cases every day, that is probably the upper limit—make it 30,000—who knows? But let’s talk about 25,000. 2% of them will actually have symptoms—that is 500 cases a day. Maybe a third or a fifth—let’s say half of them—will need to be hospitalized. That’s 250 patients a day. If they have been hospitalized for about 10 days, that means that we will have—our hospital system will have to deal with 2,500 patients every day for a certain period of time—that could be 3 or 4 weeks, and then the number will dramatically decrease again and the whole epidemic will be over … Of all symptomatic cases. 2% of all symptomatic cases will die. That is 2% of the 250,000 a day. So that is 500 people a day, and that will happen over 4 weeks. So, that could be as high as 10,000 people. Now, that compares to the normal numbers of flus during the flu season, and we have in the United States about 35,000 deaths due to flu every year during the flu season. So, it would be part of the normal situation during the flu season.”

The interviewer asked: “What do you think about their latest claim that because of social distancing, that we’ve saved ourselves from the 2 million dead, but that we are probably looking at 150,000 to 200,000 dead, though they’ve said that it’s possible that it could be lower, if we are really, really good about social distancing, etc. What do you think about their new estimate of death?”

Dr. Wittkowski replied: “Social distancing definitely is good. It prevented the sky from falling down!!!! … I don’t know where these numbers are coming from—they’re totally unrealistic. There are no indications that this flu is fundamentally different from every other flu. We know what happened in China, we know what happened in South Korea, we know what happened, or is happening, in Europe. There are no indications that anything is different from a regular flu. Maybe it’s a bit worse than other flus—could be? For a respiratory disease, the flu ends during springtime, that people spend more time outdoors because outdoors, the viruses cannot easily spread. That is a form of containment, spending more time outdoors. Going outdoors is what stops every respiratory disease.”

Just stop for a moment and―if you still possess an ounce or two of critical thinking skills and analytical skills―consider the absurdity, stupidity, illogicality and lack of common sense within the propaganda narrative that is being spewed out by the mainstream medical “experts”, mainstream media and governmental agencies. They say this virus is so infectious that half of secondary infections occur in the incubation period. At least one of every two instances of human-to-human transmission of COVID-19 is alleged to occur while the first patient is not yet showing symptoms, according to an estimate by a group of Japanese university researchers. You have all your police and military on the streets―whether in Wuhan, Italy, New York or wherever―not wearing gloves, riding the subways with recycled air, touching the grab poles and rails―yet none of the military or police are quarantined―even though they tell us this virus is so contagious that one of every two instances of human transmission occurs when a person is not showing any signs or symptoms. They claim that half of transmissions are spread when people are asymptomatic and showing NO SIGNS OR SYMPTOMS of the Coronovirus flu. So logically, the only way to control this is to not only take people who are sick―but also those who are NOT sick. YOU WOULD HAVE TO QUARANTINE EVERYONE.

You saw Chinese police and military supposedly dragging sick and “potentially” sick people out of their homes and cars and quarantining them. They were telling us that hospital staff wearing hazmat suits are getting infected! Who is quarantining the police and military who are grabbing and exposing themselves to these sick people? What about all the hospital staff exposed to this virus working around supposed sick “Wuhan infected” patients. Why are they not being quarantined. Apparently even the hospital workers are all getting infected even with Hazmat suits on….taking extreme precautions handling infected people…yet the military and police can round up sick people, walk the streets and subways with no gloves on and the virus has not spread to the police or military. This is a complete joke. Do you know how fast a virus would spread through a police station or military barracks/mess hall if iall the hype about its super-high degree of infectiousness were real? In theory every military and police personnel sent out on the streets should be quarantined for 2 weeks―whether they are asymptomatic (no symptoms) or symptomatic (showing symptoms)―before being allowed to return to their police stations/army barracks to avoid spreading this “highly deadly and extremely virulent” virus. You would run out of military and police personal within a week if you had to quarantine them for 2 weeks after being exposed to the virus on the streets or subways not to mention arresting and dragging off people with no hazmat suits on. Everyone of these soldiers should be quarantined for 2 weeks before even being allowed back to their barracks. They tell us this virus is contagious when people are not showing any signs or symptoms. How stupid are people to believe this over-exaggeration?

The second logical point is this. Even the mainstream media statistics show that the VAST MAJORITY of people who are infected, merely suffer MILD SYMPTOMS and the VAST MAJORITY RECOVER FULL HEALTH! So why the lockdowns? Why the economic shutdown? Why provoke unemployment for over 30 million in the USA alone? Why the destruction of food throughout the USA commanding farmers to destroy their crops and euthanize their animals? All of that is far, far, far more worse than the relatively harmless COVID-19 flu? Why manipulate death statistics by commanding doctors to put COVID-19 as the cause of death on as many death certificates as possible―without even testing to see if COVOID-19 was present―they are told that a mere presumption, assumption or guess is sufficient to do so? Why refuse to sit around a table with some of best scientists and doctors in the world who question, reject or even laugh at the official propaganda narrative? What are they afraid of? If they have the scientific evidence to present to these doubting scientists, then all problems would be solved and the doubters would become believers! The fact is that there is no REAL SCIENTIFIC evidence for the propaganda narrative and they know it! They prefer to by-pass those with intelligence and go straight to the “useful idiots”―the dumbed-down, non-thinking, entertainment addicted “sheeple” which forms the majority of the world.

► LIE ― Over-exaggeration of Potential Fatalities

In April of 2020, officials at the CDC (U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention) and epidemic experts from universities around the world conferred about what might happen if the new Coronavirus gained a foothold in the United States. How many people might die? How many would be infected and need hospitalization? Notice that among all the experts from universities around the world, none were called from the ranks of those who questioned and disputed the “official narrative” of the establishment or the “script-writers” of the narrative. In a Court of Law, you call witnesses for BOTH parties―the defense and the prosecution attorneys! But not in this case! The disputers, the questioners, the reputed scientists who are not afraid to raise their voices and point-out unscientific or pseudo-scientific assumptions, presumptions and conclusions―such sincere and honest scientists and experts are excluded and even censored on the internet by having their posts and videos removed by YouTube, Facebook and Twitter! Strange, huh? What about the legal right for representation by witnesses for both parties―the accused and the accusers, the defendant and the prosecutor?

DR. MATTHEW BIGGERSTAFF (or should it be BIGGERNUMBERS?), one of the CDC agency’s top disease modelers―remember that the CDC shares the same bed as Big Pharma ― presented the group of experts and the CDC officials with four possible scenarios — A, B, C and D — based on characteristics of the virus, including estimates of how transmissible it is and the severity of the illness it can cause. The assumptions, reviewed by The New York Times, were shared with about 50 expert teams to model how the virus could tear through the population — and what might stop it. Here are some of the scenarios, deductions, estimates and projections that those establishment experts came up with.

The CDC’s scenarios were depicted in terms of percentages of the population. Translated into absolute numbers by independent experts using simple models of how viruses spread, the worst-case figures would be staggering if no actions were taken to slow transmission. However, there are many non-establishment scientists (that is to say those who are not employed by the government, or Big Pharma, or Bill Gates) who hotly and vigorously dispute the wisdom effectiveness and scientific reason behind those “actions” that the mainstream medical establishment and government agencies seek to employ―both of whom are pressured and lobbied by Big Pharma―actions such as quarantining on mere suppositions and hypotheses, self-isolation and “house-arrest”, absolute insistence on mandatory MAN-MADE vaccinations as the sole means of combating this increasingly evident MAN-MADE virus.

Nevertheless, despite the sane, rational and scientific arguments that hotly contest the mainstream medical, governmental and media assumptions and presumptions and wild calculations, the mainstream narrative maintained that between 160 million and 214 million people in the United States could be infected over the course of the epidemic, according to a projection that encompasses the range of the four scenarios. That could last months or even over a year, with infections concentrated in shorter periods, staggered across time in different communities, experts said, adding that as many as 200,000 to 1.7 million people could die; with an additional 2.4 million to 21 million people in the United States possibly requiring hospitalization, potentially crushing the nation’s medical system, which has only about 925,000 staffed hospital beds. Fewer than a tenth of those are for people who are critically ill.

Hey! If you are so worried about “crushing the nation’s medical system” then you should also be worried about crushing the nation’s economic and financial system and crushing the nation’s food and agricultural system and crushing the lives and livelihood of tens of millions of Americans―but those things apparently matter little to those who are chanting, blasting and hammering home the murderous “official narrative”. You have to wonder who the scriptwriters are to that narrative! As Our Lord would say: “Leave them alone! They are blind, and leaders of the blind! And if the blind lead the blind, both will fall into the pit!” (Matthew 15:14)―except that most should not have to fall into the pit that is being dug for them.

DR. JAMES LAWLER, an infectious diseases specialist and public health expert at the University of Nebraska Medical Center, presented his own “best guess” projections to American hospital and health system executives at a private webinar convened by the American Hospital Association. He estimated that some 96 million people in the United States would be infected. Five out of every hundred would need hospitalization, which would mean close to five million hospital admissions, nearly two million of those patients requiring intensive care and about half of those needing the support of ventilators. Dr. Lawler’s calculations suggested 480,000 deaths, which he said was conservative [on the small side]. As of May 29th, 2020, the USA is reporting an “inflated” total of 104,000 deaths, a number which―because of widespread debate, contention, evidence and proof―the CDC has recently sheepishly admitted is at least 25% more than the reality. This is due to the CDC’s (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention) and NIH’s (National Institute of Health) and own requirement

THE INSTITUTE FOR DISEASE MODELING calculated that the new Coronavirus is roughly equally transmissible as the 1918 flu, and just slightly less clinically severe, and it is higher in both transmissibility and severity compared with all other flu viruses in the past century.

DR. IRA LONGINI, co-director of the Center for Statistics and Quantitative Infectious Diseases at the University of Florida, said that the scenarios were marked valid until February 28th, 2020, but remain “roughly the same” (as of March 18th, 2020). He further said: “We’re being very, very careful to make sure we have scientifically valid modeling that’s drawing properly on the epidemic and what’s known about the virus,” adding a warning that simple calculations could be misleading or even dangerous: “You can’t win. If you overdo it, you panic everybody. If you underdo it, they get complacent. You have to be careful.”

Earlier in this month, on May 5th, 2020, The New York Times and The Washington Post reported that a draft government report projected Covid-19 deaths in the United States, would rise to more than 3,000 a day by June 1st, 2020, with new confirmed cases surging to about 200,000 daily. Researchers at the Center for Infectious Disease Research and Policy issued a report, on April 30th, 2020, that suggested the pandemic would last 18 to 24 months, reappearing in waves of varying intensity. PANIC! PANIC! PANIC! HELP! HELP! HELP! Rush for the lifeboats―that is rush for vaccine lifeboats! “I don’t want to die! I don’t want to die! I’m too young to die! Please! Someone help me! Please! Someone vaccinate me before I die!”

THE REALITY: Yet for all this hype and hoopla―which is merely a “front” for fear-mongering and panic-planting―as of May 30th, 2020 (which is a full 3 months into the USA version of the Plannedemic), there are, instead of 1.7 million (1,700,000) USA deaths from COVID-19, a total of 103,000 deaths (and, by the CDC’s own admission, that number has been highly inflated by 25% due to deliberate manipulation and misrepresentation).

● TOTAL PROJECTED INFECTIONS: Instead of the estimated and projected 160 million to 214 million Americans being infected by COVID-19, the current reported total is 1,777,351 (1.7 million).

● TOTAL PROJECTED DEATHS: Instead of the projected 1,700,000 (1.7 million) deaths from COVID-19, the current total of deaths for 3 full months (from the beginning March to the end of May) is 103,000, which, if it continued like that all year long (which will never happen), then it would be 310,000 deaths for the year―which, out of a total US population of 330 million, would mean a death rate of just less than 1 person out of every 1,000 people. Bear in mind that the regular annual USA death rate is anywhere from 8 to 9 persons dying out of every 1,000 people. In other words, 1 out of every 111 to 125 Americans dies every year!  Even if 310,000 people die from COVID-19 (remember, those numbers are grossly inflated, as now admitted by the CDC), then how does that 310,000 compare or relate to the more than 2,800,000 (2.8 million) deaths the USA regularly experiences each year?

● TOTAL PROJECTED DAILY DEATHS: Instead of the estimated 3,000 regular daily new deaths by June 1st, 2020, the current rate for deaths over the last 6 weeks, since April 16th, 2020, has seen the daily new deaths number fluctuating below the 1,500 mark for 28 out of those 42 days (which 66% of the time) and hovering around the 1,000 or below for new cases per day for 40% of the time. From the first reported case until May 29th (90 days), the average daily death rate has been 1,129 persons. However, there were very few deaths in the opening days. If you take the period from April 1st to May 29th (59 days) then the average daily rate is 1,669 persons. Incidentally, the average daily normal death rate in the USA has been around the 8,000 a day mark for many years! Also, do not forget that the daily COVID death rate has been admitted by the CDC as being over-inflated and deliberately manipulated by 25%.

● TOTAL PROJECTED NEW DAILY INFECTIONS: Instead of the estimated regular 200,000 newly confirmed infections daily―over the last six weeks, since April 16th, 2020, the daily new case numbers have only crossed the 12,000 mark on three different days; additionally, on one other day, it slightly crossed the 10,000 mark, then on another day it was just under the 8,000 mark, then once at around 5,000; also, once around 4,000; and for the rest of the days it mainly fluctuated between 2,000 down to just a few hundred new daily cases. All of this is a far cry from 200,000 new cases daily. Again, fear-mongering and panic-planting. Has the mainstream media (MSM) come back and clearly underlined and reported these gross discrepancies and miscalculations? No! Because the mainstream media (or rather its behind-the-scenes owners and puppet-masters) wants people to be as worried, fearful and panicky as possible.

DR. KNUT WITTKOWSKI, Head of the Department of Biostatistics Epidemiology and Research Design at the Rockefeller University for 20 years, before in Germany, he worked for 15 years with Dr. Klaus Dietz, one of the leading epidemiologists in the world, says: “With all respiratory diseases, the only thing that stops the disease is herd immunity. About 80% of the people need to have had contact with the virus, and the majority of them won’t even have recognized that they were infected, or they had very, very mild symptoms, especially if they are children. So, it’s very important to keep the schools open and kids mingling to spread the virus to get herd immunity as fast as possible, and then the elderly people, who should be separated, and the nursing homes should be closed during that time, can come back and meet their children and grandchildren after about 4 weeks when the virus has been exterminated.

“As with every respiratory disease, we should protect the elderly and fragile because when they get pneumonia, they have a high risk of dying of the pneumonia. So that is one of the key issues that we should keep in mind. On the other hand, children do very well with these diseases. They’re evolutionarily designed to be exposed to all sorts of viruses during their lifetime, and so they should keep going to school and infecting each other. Then, that contributes to herd immunity , which means after about four weeks at the most, the elderly people could start joining their family, because then the virus would have been extinguished.”

DR. DANIEL W. ERICKSON and DR. ARTIN MASSIHI, of Bakersfield, California, are former emergency-room physician who co-own Accelerated Urgent Care in Bakersfield. They are experienced medical professionals who between them have 40 years of hands-on experience in dealing with viruses and respiratory infections. In a recent April press conference, they had this to say on the COVID crisis and potential fatality rates:

“We’re going to go over the numbers a little bit to kind of help you see how widespread COVID is, and see how we should be responding to it based on its prevalence throughout society—or the existence of the cases that we already know about …. If you look at California—these numbers are from yesterday—we have 33,865 COVID cases, out of a total of 280,900 total tested. That’s 12% of Californians were positive for COVID. The initial models were woefully inaccurate. They predicted millions of cases of death—not of prevalence or incidence—but death. That is not materializing. What is materializing is, in the state of California is 12% positives. You have a 0.03 chance of dying from COVID in the state of California. Does that necessitate sheltering in place? Does that necessitate shutting down medical systems? Does that necessitate people being out of work? 96% of people in California who get COVID would recover, with almost no significant sequelae [consequences]; or no significant continuing medical problems. Two months ago we didn’t know this. The more you test, the more positives you get. The prevalence number goes up, and the death rate stays the same. So [the death rate] gets smaller and smaller and smaller. And as we move through this data—what I want you to see is—millions of cases, small death. Millions of cases, small death.

“We extrapolate data, we test people, and then we extrapolate for the entire community based on the numbers. The initial models were so inaccurate they’re not even correct. And some of them were based on social distancing and still predicted hundreds of thousands of deaths, which has been inaccurate. In New York the ones they tested they found 39% positive. So if they tested the whole state would we indeed have 7.5 million cases? We don’t know; we will never test the entire state. So we extrapolate out; we use the data we have because it’s the most we have versus a predictive model that has been nowhere in the ballpark of accurate. How many deaths do they have? 19,410 out of 19 million people, which is a 0.1% chance of dying from COVID in the state of New York. If you are indeed diagnosed with COVID-19, 92% of you will recover.

“We’ve tested over 4 million… which gives us a 19.6% positive out of those who are tested for COVID-19. So if this is a typical extrapolation 328 million people times 19.6 is 64 million. That’s a significant amount of people with COVID; it’s similar to the flu. If you study the numbers in 2017 and 2018 we had 50 to 60 million with the flu. And we had a similar death rate in the deaths the United States were 43,545—similar to the flu of 2017-2018. We always have between 37,000 and 60,000 deaths in the United States, every single year. No pandemic talk. No shelter-in-place. No shutting down businesses…

“We do thousands of flu tests every year. We don’t report every one, because the flu is ubiquitous and to that note we have a flu vaccine. How many people even get the flu vaccine? The flu is dangerous, it kills people. Just because you have a vaccine doesn’t mean it’s gonna be everywhere and it doesn’t mean everyone’s going to take it… I would say probably 50% of the public doesn’t even want it. Just because you have a vaccine—unless you forced it on the public—doesn’t mean they’re going to take it.

“Norway has locked down; Sweden does not have lock down. What happened in those two countries? Are they vastly different? Did Sweden have a massive outbreak of cases? Did Norway have nothing? Let’s look at the numbers. Sweden has 15,322 cases of COVID—21% of all those tested came out positive for COVID. What’s the population of Sweden? About 10.4 million. So if we extrapolate out the data about 2 million cases of COVID in Sweden. They did a little bit of social distancing; they would wear masks and separate; they went to schools; stores were open. They were almost about their normal daily life with a little bit of social distancing. They had how many deaths? 1,765. California’s had 1,220 with isolation. No isolation: 1,765. We have more people. Norway: its next-door neighbor. These are two Scandinavian nations; we can compare them as they are similar. 4.9% of all COVID tests were positive in Norway. Population of Norway: 5.4 million. So if we extrapolate the data, as we’ve been doing, which is the best we can do at this point, they have about 1.3 million cases. Now their deaths as a total number, were 182. So you have a 0.003 chance of death as a citizen of Norway and a 97% recovery. Their numbers are a little bit better. Does it necessitate shutdown, loss of jobs, destruction of the oil company, furloughing doctors?”

► LIE ― Death Statistics Manipulated and Fabricated

Here are some extracts from an official e-mail from the medical and statistical authorities, sent to doctors throughout the USA, instructing them with regard the matter of entering Coronavirus (COVID-19) on death certificates:

“A newly-introduced ICD (International Classification of Diseases) code has been implemented to accurately capture mortality data for Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) on death certificates … The new ICD code for Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) is U07.1 … The rules for coding and selection of the underlying cause of death are expected to result in COVID19 being the underlying cause more often than not … If the death certificate reports terms such as “probable COVID-19” or “likely COVID-19,” these terms would be assigned the new ICD code. It Is not likely that NCHS will follow up on these cases.”

DR. ANNIE BUKACEK, a Montana physician of over 30 years experience, states: “Telling the truth is considered a threat to the national security … The decision for unprecedented government-mandated lockdown has been based on the alleged death rate of COVID-19. Is this death rate based on truth? Are the reported deaths from COVID-19 truly deaths from COVID-19? To address this question, we need to discuss death certificates since death certificates are the basic source of information about mortality. History-changing decisions are being made due to these figures―despite the fact that they are flat-out wrong, based on data that is insufficient and often inaccurate. People know how much individual power and leeway is given to the physician coroner or medical examiner signing the death certificate. How do I know this? I’ve been filling out death certificates for over 30 years. More often than we want to admit, we don’t know with certainty the cause of death when we fill out death certificates. Physicians make their best guesstimate and fill out the form then that listed cause of death, whatever we list, is entered into a vital records databank to use for statistical analysis―which then gives out inaccurate numbers as you can imagine. Those inaccurate numbers are then accepted as “factual information” even though much of it is false. So even before we heard of COVID-19, death certificates were based on assumptions and educated guesses that go unquestioned. When it comes to COVID-19, there’s the additional data skewer that there is no universal definition of COVID-19 death.”

“The Center for Disease Control, updated from yesterday April 4th, 2020, still states that “mortality” data includes both confirmed and presumptive positive cases of COVID-19. … The CDC counts both true COVID-19 cases and speculative guesses of COVID-19 the same, they call it death by COVID-19. They automatically overestimate the real death numbers by their own admission … We need to understand how the CDC and the National Vital Statistics System are instructing physicians to fill out death certificates related to COVID-19. Brace yourselves, and please pay attention and let what I’m about to tell you sink in. The assumption of COVID-19 death could be made even without testing. Based on assumption alone, the death can be reported to the public as another COVID-19 casualty. The March 24th, 2020, NVSS memo states:

“The rules for coding and selection of the underlying cause of death are expected to result in COVID-19 being the underlying cause more often than not.”

“Stephen Schwartz, national director of the division of vital statistics, says an answer to the question as stated in the organization’s COVID-19 alert: “Should COVID-19 be reported on the death certificate only with a confirmed test?” Check out his answer:

SCHWARTZ: “COVID-19 should be reported on the death certificate for all decedents where the disease caused or is assumed to have caused or contributed to death. Certifiers should include as much detail as possible based on their knowledge of the case, medical records, laboratory testing, etc.” …

Dr. Annie Bukacek continues: “If a patient is positive for COVID-19 and dies from another cause such as pneumococcal sepsis, it may be considered accurate to say that person died WITH COVID-19 NOT FROM COVID-19. Yet the CDC guideline lists this case as one more COVID-19 death and they go to the next questionable death, they label that as COVID-19 and it goes on and on. You could see how these statistics have been made to look scary when it is so easy to add false numbers to the official database. Those false numbers are sanctioned by the CDC as of their memo yesterday, April 4th. The real number of COVID-19 deaths are not what most people are told and what they then think. How many people actually died from COVID-19 is anyone’s guess. Based on inaccurate, incomplete data, people are being terrorized by fear-mongers into relinquishing freedoms.”

DR. DANIEL W. ERICKSON says: “When someone dies in this country right now they’re not talking about the high blood pressure, the diabetes, the stroke. They say they died from COVID. We’ve been to hundreds of autopsies. You don’t talk about one thing, you talk about comorbidities. COVID was part of it, it is not the reason they died folks. When I’m writing up my death report I’m being pressured to add COVID. Why is that? Why are we being pressured to add COVID? To maybe increase the numbers, and make it look a little bit worse than it is. We’re being pressured in-house to add COVID to the diagnostic list when we think it has nothing to do with the actual cause of death. The actual cause of death was not COVID, but it’s being reported as one of the disease processes and being added to the death list. COVID didn’t kill them―25 years of tobacco use killed them.”

DATA, STATISTICS, ESTIMATES, PROJECTIONS―THE EVER CHANGING FOUR SEASONS:  On April 7th, 2020, Dr. Deborah Birx, the White House Coronavirus Task Force Response Coordinator, said: “I think that in this country we have taken a very liberal approach to mortality and that the reporting here has been pretty straightforward for the last 5 to 6 weeks … There are other countries that, if you had a pre-existing condition―let’s say the virus causes you to go the ICU and then have a heart or kidney problem, then some countries are recording that as a heart issue or a kidney issue and not a COVID-19 death [just plain old common sense and honesty, don’t you think? Of course! But then Dr. Birx continues] Right now we are still recording it and will ― I mean the great thing about having forms that come in and a form that has the ability to mark it as a COVID-19 infection―the intent is, right now, that If someone dies with COVID-19, we are counting that as a COVID-19 death.”

This is backed-up by one NR (Nurse Practitioner) who revealed anonymously―for fear of repercussions and punishment ― “There was a patient who passed away in a nursing home, under hospice care―which means you’re basically [already] DYING! But because they had a COVID test―I don’t know how they ended up getting a COVID test―that is bizarre that you would do that to a hospice patient [who is already dying from something else], but they would get a COVID test positive, so that person did not die of their terminal disease―they died of COVID! This is what is happening! This is what is happening!! That is the issue―our hands are tied and we can’t disclose this information to the media. We can’t disclose this technically to anyone―or you are breaking a Federal Law! So there is another problem as well. People are saying: ‘What are the facts?’ and you’re going [saying]: ‘Well, I cannot tell you the facts―because, under law, I am required not to!’ It is a tough situation to try and wake people up, because they want to hear exactly why you’re saying what you’re saying, but you can’t tell them. The thing to remember is that each practitioner―even though you have two entities that you are operating under―one is your own personal license, where you, as a nurse, have the right, and where you, as a physician, have the right to say: ‘I will not do what I am being asked, because it is doing harm!’ You have the legal right to refuse. But there is a different set of rules when you work for a [medical] facility or an entity!”

Instructions issued in March of 2020, by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) seem to corroborate Dr. Birx’s explanation on COVID-19 mortality recording: “COVID-19 should be reported on the death certificate for all decedents where the disease caused or is assumed to have caused or contributed to death ... Certifiers [of the cause of death] should include as much detail as possible based on their knowledge of the case, medical records, laboratory testing, etc. If the decedent [the deceased] had other chronic conditions such as COPD or asthma that may have also contributed, these conditions can be reported in Part 2” [of the form―Part 2 is the part or line that lists the secondary cause of death]” ― but Part 1 is the line or part of the form which is the section for the primary cause of death, and this is reserved for you know what― yes, COVID-19]. Furthermore, did you know that most of the tests for COVID-19 are not explicitly COVID-19 tests but Coronavirus tests? This means that if you had the flu, or ever received a flu shot within the last

Anyone with a sound mind and common sense can see that there is a big difference between dying WITH the virus and FROM the virus.

CHANGING THE STATISTICS ONCE AGAIN: On May 9th, 2020, Dr. Deborah Birx seems to make a “U-Turn” by saying that she believes some official COVID-19 statistics like death tolls may be inflated by up to 25%, a new report states. Dr. Birx criticized the method the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) was using to collect its data during a heated task force meeting, according to a report Saturday from The Washington Post. “There is nothing from the CDC that I can trust,” Dr. Birx reportedly told CDC Director Robert Redfield. Dr. Birx told The Washington Post, in a statement, that “mortality is slowly declining each day,” and that the focus should be on protecting Americans who are older, or have pre-existing health conditions, that make them vulnerable to the virus. “To keep with this trend, it is essential that seniors and those with co-morbidities shelter in place, and that we continue to protect vulnerable communities,” Dr. Birx reportedly said.

Recently, as of May 28th, 2020, the CDC (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention) were forced to "backtrack" and "revise" their blatantly exaggerated models or estimates as to the severity of the COVID-10 Coronavirus.

► LIE ― Who Dies From COVID-19

Dr. Deborah Birx, the Coronavirus Response Coordinator for the White House Coronavirus Task Force, is on record and on video saying: “If someone dies with COVID-19, we are counting that as a COVID-19 death.”

DR. JUDY MIKOVITS, has a Ph.D. in biochemistry and molecular biology. She joined the National Institute of Health in 1980 as a Postdoctoral Scholar in Molecular Virology and began a 20-year collaboration with Frank Ruscetti, a pioneer in the field of human retro virology. On the matter of who is said to be dying from COVID-19, Dr. Mikovits says: “The books are being cooked on who’s positive in SARS-CoV-2. The disease doesn’t fit. You don’t die WITH an infection, you die FROM an infection. Right now Medicare is determined that if you have a COVID-19 admission to the hospital you’ll get paid $13,000 [which is more than the hospital gets for other illnesses or diseases it treats]. If that COVID-19 patient goes on a ventilator you get $39,000, three times as much. And you’ve killed them with the ventilator because you gave them the wrong treatment.By putting Covid-19 on a death certificate, refusing to do one autopsy to prove to me―what I had to prove to everybody―that those microvasculature are popping with Coronavirus — whole infectious Coronavirus. Not a little bit of RNA you have to amplify. Show me the proteins. Show me the rest of the virus. Show me the electron micrograph. Do a single autopsy. None of that’s been done! Why? Because they’re covering up―because it’s NOT this Coronavirus. They’re covering up! They are burying them without autopsies!”

► LIE ― Propaganda About Face Masks and Their Danger

DR. JUDY MIKOVITS: “Can you believe they told everybody to wear a mask? If you have COPD and you wear a mask, you will kill yourself. You will cause the very disease you’re trying to prevent. Wearing the mask literally activates your own virus. You’re getting sick from your own reactivated coronavirus expressions, and if it happens to be SARS-CoV-2, then you’ve got a big problem. Number one, if your mask is just this scarf cover of your face — all that does is make you breathe in and out. I see people running and riding bikes with these masks. It doesn’t prevent mold, mildew, all the stuff that’s in the air, the pollens [from] allergy season. Those go right there into your sinus cavity, into your nasopharyngeal cavity. You’re exercising. You’re breathing hard. You’re sucking that stuff into your lungs and you’re sucking back in CO2. We don’t do photosynthesis. We’re humans. We have to breathe oxygen. We can’t breathe back in our own toxic air. That’s why you exhale. That’s why you breathe deeply. That’s why you cough to expel a pathogen. You cough in your own mask and you suppress your own immune system. You use your own type one interferons in your throat, in your nose, in your blood. It’s horribly immune suppressive.

“Probably most of your audience has never worn a mask before all day. Nurses and doctors who have to, they’re keeping themselves from getting sick from their patients. The patient certainly doesn’t wear a mask. They deliver oxygen through a cannula. For healthy people, you’re not getting fresh air. You’re suppressing your immune response. You’re activating endogenous viruses. When you activate endogenous viruses, your immune system has to go and knock down those viruses. Inflammatory mass cells respond to pollen. [For] people with things like mass cell activation disorder, mass mastocytosis, this is just a hair trigger reactivation of that very inflammatory cytokine signature of disease. Resident mass cells get reactivated. Say you get allergies or whatever. When you wear that mask, you’re concentrating those antigens and you’re making yourself sicker. It’s warm; it’s wet. You touch it; it’s abnormal; it’s uncomfortable. Those are all things that are immune draining, not immune boosting. You’re making yourself sick with other sources. It makes no sense. You’re not preventing infection. You have of “carriers.” What does that mean? They’re not infectious if they’re not coughing. You don’t cough RNA. You don’t have particles in your nose. They’re looking at RNA in your nose. You have particles in your blood. You don’t cough that. You certainly don’t cough it six feet. When you’re sick, what do you do? You feel horrible. You have a bit of a fever. You don’t even want to get out of bed. You can’t open your eyes. You lay there. That’s sickness behavior. That’s your immune response clearing the pathogen. You don’t leave the house. If you’re recovered, like my husband from COPD, you must go out there and get fresh air. He’s not infectious to anybody just because he coughs, nor am I just because I cough. Mine is a congenital pleurisy I got because I was born six weeks early as an identical twin. Pleurisy means filled with fluid. I always have to clear my lungs, and I always cough. I will not wear a mask. I just walk in the store and say, “Hey, I have a congenital lung disease, and I can’t wear a mask. Thank you very much for” ― I don’t say “for your stupidity” but ― “protecting me!” You don’t protect anybody. I worked in a biosafety level three facility with HIV for 30 years. I pulled viruses out of saliva and blood. I never once wore a mask. I reminded Dr. Rossetti of this the other day. He said, “We wore masks.” I was like, “No, we didn’t. No, we didn’t.” We weren’t at risk until 2011 [when] it was realized that that mouse cancer causing retrovirus is contagious. Please take off the mask. Go outside if you’re healthy.”

DR. RUSSELL BLAYLOCK, a neurosurgeon, has written an editorial saying that “masks pose serious risks to the healthy.”  First, Blaylock says, there is no scientific evidence that masks are effective against COVID-19 transmission. Pro-science people should care about this. “As for the scientific support for the use of face mask, a recent careful examination of the literature, in which 17 of the best studies were analyzed, concluded that, “None of the studies established a conclusive relationship between mask/respirator use and protection against influenza infection.”   Keep in mind, no studies have been done to demonstrate that either a cloth mask or the N95 mask has any effect on transmission of the COVID-19 virus. Any recommendations, therefore, have to be based on studies of influenza virus transmission. And, as you have seen, there is no conclusive evidence of their efficiency in controlling flu virus transmission.

“It is also instructive to know that until recently, the CDC [Centers for Disease Control & Prevention] did not recommend wearing a face mask or covering of any kind, unless a person was known to be infected, that is, until recently. Non-infected people need not wear a mask. When a person has TB [tuberculosis] we have them wear a mask, not the entire community of non-infected. The recommendations by the CDC and the WHO [World Health Organization] are not based on any studies of this virus and have never been used to contain any other virus pandemic or epidemic in history.”

Beyond the lack of scientific data to support wearing a mask as a deterrent to a virus, Blaylock says the more pressing concern is what can and will happen to the wearer.

“Now that we have established that there is no scientific evidence necessitating the wearing of a face mask for prevention―are there dangers to wearing a face mask, especially for long periods? Several studies have indeed found significant problems with wearing such a mask. This can vary from headaches, to increased airway resistance, carbon dioxide accumulation, to hypoxia, all the way to serious life-threatening complications.”

There are studies to back that claim up. “In one such study, researchers surveyed 212 healthcare workers (47 males and 165 females) asking about presence of headaches with N95 mask use, duration of the headaches, type of headaches and if the person had preexisting headaches. They found that about a third of the workers developed headaches with use of the mask, most had preexisting headaches that were worsened by the mask wearing, and 60% required pain medications for relief. As to the cause of the headaches, while straps and pressure from the mask could be causative, the bulk of the evidence points toward hypoxia and/or hypercapnia as the cause. That is, a reduction in blood oxygenation (hypoxia) or an elevation in blood C02 (hypercapnia). It is known that the N95 mask, if worn for hours, can reduce blood oxygenation as much as 20%, which can lead to a loss of consciousness, as happened to the hapless fellow driving around alone in his car wearing an N95 mask, causing him to pass out, and to crash his car and sustain injuries. I am sure that we have several cases of elderly individuals or any person with poor lung function passing out, hitting their head. This, of course, can lead to death. A more recent study involving 159 healthcare workers aged 21 to 35 years of age found that 81% developed headaches from wearing a face mask. Some had pre-existing headaches that were precipitated by the masks. All felt like the headaches affected their work performance.”

Blaylock says studies have also shown that face masks impair oxygen intake dramatically, potentially leading to serious problems. “The importance of these findings is that a drop in oxygen levels (hypoxia) is associated with an impairment in immunity. Studies have shown that hypoxia can inhibit the type of main immune cells used to fight viral infections called the CD4+ T-lymphocyte. This occurs because the hypoxia increases the level of a compound called hypoxia inducible factor-1 (HIF-1), which inhibits T-lymphocytes and stimulates a powerful immune inhibitor cell called the Tregs. . This sets the stage for contracting any infection, including COVID-19 and making the consequences of that infection much graver. In essence, your mask may very well put you at an increased risk of infections and if so, having a much worse outcome.”

In other words, if you wear a face mask and contract some sickness, you will not be able to fight it off as effectively as if you had normal blood oxygen levels. The mask could make you sicker. It could also create a “deadly cytokine storm” in some. “There is another danger to wearing these masks on a daily basis, especially if worn for several hours. When a person is infected with a respiratory virus, they will expel some of the virus with each breath. If they are wearing a mask, especially an N95 mask or other tightly fitting mask, they will be constantly rebreathing the viruses, raising the concentration of the virus in the lungs and the nasal passages. We know that people who have the worst reactions to the Coronavirus have the highest concentrations of the virus early on. And this leads to the deadly cytokine storm in a selected number.”

How about cancer, heart attacks, and strokes? Blaylock says face masks can make all of those conditions worse: “People with cancer, especially if the cancer has spread, will be at a further risk from prolonged hypoxia as the cancer grows best in a microenvironment that is low in oxygen. Low oxygen also promotes inflammation which can promote the growth, invasion and spread of cancers. Repeated episodes of hypoxia has been proposed as a significant factor in atherosclerosis and hence increases all cardiovascular (heart attacks) and cerebrovascular (strokes) diseases.”

If that’s not bad enough, how would you like COVID-19 in your brain? “It gets even more frightening. Newer evidence suggests that in some cases the virus can enter the brain. In most instances it enters the brain by way of the olfactory nerves (smell nerves), which connect directly with the area of the brain dealing with recent memory and memory consolidation. By wearing a mask, the exhaled viruses will not be able to escape and will concentrate in the nasal passages, enter the olfactory nerves and travel into the brain.”

DR. ANTHONY FAUCI ― As if universal mask recommendations weren’t enough, the last week of July 2020, Dr. Anthony Fauci started flouting the recommendation to wear goggles and full face shields as well, as the mucous membranes of your eyes can also serve as entryways for viruses. Fauci is also urging everyone to get their flu shots as soon as they become available. As reported by The Hill:

“During an interview with ABC News medical correspondent Jennifer Ashton, Fauci was asked whether the U.S. would one day recommend eye protection due to the pandemic. ‘You know, it might,’ Fauci said, noting that it would offer an added layer of protection. ‘You have mucosa in the nose, mucosa in the mouth, but you also have mucosa in the eye,’ he added. ‘Theoretically, you should protect all the mucosal surfaces.’ Fauci went on to say that if you have ‘goggles or an eye shield, you should use it.’ While it's not universally recommended, both goggles and a face covering would provide ‘complete’ protection from the coronavirus, he said.”

As reported by Life Site News, July 31st, 2020: “Fauci … suggested that masking should morph from a temporary emergency measure to a permanent seasonal practice: ‘It is inevitable that we're going to have some degree of flu. I'm hoping that the wearing of masks and other coverings are going to not only protect us against COVID-19, but also help protect us against influenza.’” In what appears to be an effort to back up the mask mandates for COVID-19, Fauci is now also endorsing the wearing of masks during every influenza season going forward.

Fauci’s support of universal masking and goggle-wearing is in stark contrast to comments he made back in March 2020, when Fauci stated that “people should not be walking around with masks” because “it’s not providing the perfect protection that people think that it is. And often there are unintended consequences: People keep fiddling with their mask and they keep touching their face.”

In related news, Maria Elena Bottazzi, a COVID-19 vaccine developer at Baylor College of Medicine, claims social distancing and face masks will likely still be required even after a vaccine becomes available, as the vaccine will not offer 100% protection against infection. For example, Moderna is hoping to only achieve a 60% effectiveness rate in its Phase 3 trials. Even if the vaccine reaches 90% effectiveness [never has a vaccine against flu ever reached such dreamy unrealistic heights―see article #7 above], people with high-risk health conditions will need to continue wearing masks, Moderna’s CEO Stephanie Bancel said.

Public health recommendations such as universal mask wearing, which also has its risks, should not be pinned on hope alone, however — which is what Fauci is doing. If we are to follow the science, then universal mask-wearing should not be implemented for either influenza or COVID-19 reduction.

DR. ANDREW BOSTOM, of Brown University, noted in a July 11th, 2020, Medium post: “… limited, immediate-term experimental observations — equivocal at best — provide no rational, evidence-based justification for daily, prolonged mask usage by the general public to prevent infection with COVID-19. Moreover, a subsequent pooled (so-called ‘meta-‘) analysis of 10 controlled trials―assessing extended, real-world, non-health-care-setting mask usage―revealed that masking did not reduce the rate of laboratory-proven infections with the respiratory virus influenza. The findings from this unique report — published May 2020 by the CDC’s own ‘house journal’ ‘Emerging Infectious Diseases’ — are directly germane to the question of masking to prevent COVID-19 infection and merit some elaboration. Ten randomized, controlled trials reporting estimates of facemask effectiveness in lowering rates of laboratory-confirmed influenza within the community, published between 2008 and 2016, were analyzed and pooled, applying a rigorous, standardized methodology. None of these studies, individually, or their aggregated, pooled analysis, which enhanced the overall ‘statistical power’ to detect a significant benefit of masking for the reduction of confirmed influenza infection … The authors further concluded with a caution that using face masks improperly might ‘increase the risk for (viral) transmission.’”

Other studies have come to the same conclusions. For example, a paper in the April 2020 issue of the New England Journal of Medicine pointed out: “We know that wearing a mask outside health care facilities offers little, if any, protection from infection. Public health authorities define a significant exposure to COVID-19 as face-to-face contact within 6 feet with a patient with symptomatic Covid-19 that is sustained for at least a few minutes (and some say more than 10 minutes or even 30 minutes). The chance of catching COVID-19 from a passing interaction in a public space is therefore minimal. In many cases, the desire for widespread masking is a reflexive reaction to anxiety over the pandemic … What is clear, however, is that universal masking alone is not a panacea. A mask will not protect providers caring for a patient with active Covid-19 if it’s not accompanied by meticulous hand hygiene, eye protection, gloves, and a gown. A mask alone will not prevent health care workers with early Covid-19 from contaminating their hands and spreading the virus to patients and colleagues. Focusing on universal masking alone may, paradoxically, lead to more transmission of Covid-19 if it diverts attention from implementing more fundamental infection-control measures.”

In an apparent attempt to address the ineffectiveness of standard medical and cloth masks against airborne viruses, Noam Gavriely, an Israeli gas mask innovator, is now promoting ViriMASK, a new type of mask said to block 99.25% of particles with a diameter of at least 0.087 microns. SARS-CoV-2 is a beta-coronavirus with a diameter between 0.06 to 0.14 microns―which means that the ViriMASK will only stop less than half of the SARS-CoV-2 particles! The device looks like a cross between a diver’s mask and a square gas mask. So far, the company has sold about 10,000 of these masks. Hey guys! Have you forgotten about our GOD GIVEN IMMUNE SYSTEM, which needs no research, which we know how to strengthen, and which we know has so far had OVER A 90% SUCCESS RATE IN WARDING OFF SARS-CoV-2. As of AUGUST 12th, 2020, the official mainstream statistics show that OF ALL 14,315,974 (14.3 million) CLOSED CASES―meaning that there has been an outcome of either recovery or death―a massive total of 13,566,933 (95%) have recovered or discharged (if they had to go to hospital) and the death rate is only 749,041 (5%). Of the remaining currently 6,357,507 (6.3 million) ACTIVE CASES ― meaning patients who are currently infected ― a massive total of 6,292,846 (99%) are in mild condition and only 64,661 (1%) are in a serious or critical condition. REMEMBER―those numbers reflect the power of our GOD GIVEN IMMUNE SYSTEM―because man has not yet invented or come up with his solution or medicine or vaccine for SARS-CoV-2. Masks and face-shields do not help you recover from SARS-CoV-2 and therefore masks and face-shields are not behind the above numbers of recovered patients and cases of mild symptoms―it is our GOD GIVEN IMMUNE SYSTEM that is behind all that!

► LIE ― Propaganda about Social Distancing [comments to be added]

HIGH SCHOOL STUDENT'S RIDICULOUS BRAINCHILD: Social distancing was invented by a high-school kid and politicians, not scientists. Jeffrey Tucker of the American Institute for Economic research reports that the origin of this cult of “social distancing” being used for totalitarian lockdowns was the brainchild of a high schooler’s sociology paper in 2006, promoted by the Bush administration during the Avian Flu. This notion of “social distancing” was widely mocked by the epidemiological community at that time (2006 onwards), as well as Johns Hopkins, for the grave risk of “causing the potential for a ‘serious adverse outcome’,” thereby making “a manageable epidemic … move toward catastrophe.”

► LIE ― Manner of Infection [comments to be added]

► LIE ― Fake Claims for Testing for COVID-19 [comments to be added]

► LIE ― Propaganda about Hospitals Bursting at the Seams [comments to be added]

► LIE ― The Power of the Immune System [comments to be added]

► LIE ― Prevention of Herd Immunity Forming [comments to be added]

► LIE ― Rejection of God’s Medicine [comments to be added]

► LIE ― Ineffectiveness of Vaccines―even admitted by the CDC [comments to be added]

► LIE ― Immunity Passports―No Permission to be Out-and-About Unless Vaccinated [comments to be added]

► LIE ― Forced Electronic ‘Branding’, ‘Tattooing’ and ‘Chipping’ [comments to be added]

► LIE ― Ventilators [comments to be added]

► LIE ― Over-exaggeration of measures taken [more comments to be added]

YORAM LASS former Director-General of Israel’s Ministry of Health, is a staunch critic of the lockdown policy adopted in his native Israel and around the world. He has described our response to COVID-19 as a form of hysteria. He says: “It is the first epidemic in history which is accompanied by another epidemic – the virus of the social networks. These new media have brainwashed entire populations. What you get is fear and anxiety, and an inability to look at real data. And therefore you have all the ingredients for monstrous hysteria. It is what is known in science as positive feedback or a snowball effect. The government is afraid of its constituents. Therefore, it implements draconian measures. The constituents look at the draconian measures and become even more hysterical. They feed each other and the snowball becomes larger and larger until you reach irrational territory. This is nothing more than a flu epidemic if you care to look at the numbers and the data, but people who are in a state of anxiety are blind. If I were making the decisions, I would try to give people the real numbers. And I would never destroy my country.”

DR. JUDY MIKOVITS: Why would you close the beach? You’ve got sequences in the soil, in the sand. You’ve got healing microbes in the ocean in the salt water. That’s insanity.

THE WASHINGTON POST, in its April 3rd, 2020, article “Stop the COVID-19 Shutdown Madness”, states: “How do you like being under house arrest? A bit of an overstatement — perhaps — but not by much. How much longer are you willing to endure it? The COVID-19 crisis has caused government — federal, state and local — to strip away many basic liberties. Do you think the politicians will give them all back now that they have tasted the power to corral the people while being met with little more than a whimper? We are told we will get our liberties back on the basis of “what the data and models show” — whatever that might mean. The main model that the government was using a couple of weeks ago projected there would be 240,000 deaths in the United States, even after all of the mitigation efforts. After a series of revisions, their projected total deaths is now approximately 60,000. Sixty thousand deaths is terrible, but almost 3 million Americans die each year from all causes (a little less than 1 percent of the population). If the new 60,000 projected COVID-19 deaths is at all accurate, it will mean that about one out of every 5,500 Americans will die from the virus. Less than 1 percent of the COVID-19 deaths will occur among those who are younger than 34. Yet, if you are 65 or older, your chance of dying from COVID-19 is one in 1,250, but your chance of dying from all causes is already one in 24 in any given year. To put it another way, last year, among the roughly 50 million Americans 65 or older, there were 2,067,400 deaths. According to the latest CDC model, about 40,000 Americans 65 or older will die as a result of COVID-19, less than 2 percent of those who would die if there were no virus. Most of those in the 65-plus age who die are the oldest, 80 and above, with underlying conditions, and who have very short additional life expectancy.

“So, why is the government shutting down the entire economy to lengthen the average life span of the oldest Americans by a few months at most? Yes, there are a few young people who will be infected and tragically die, but the odds of this happening to any given individual are so small as being almost impossible to measure with any certainty. The CDC data on death rates show if one is under 35 the chances of dying from COVID-19 is much lower than that of being in a bicycle accident. Why are we not banning bicycles? The authorities say (in a rare display of good sense) it is OK to shop in grocery stores and drug stores (thank goodness), but these stores sell many items other than groceries, particularly the Walmarts. On the basis of fairness and common sense alone, should not stores that sell anything sold in a Walmart, Target, CVS or Walgreens also be allowed to open?” (The Washington Post, April 3rd, 2020, article “Stop the COVID-19 Shutdown Madness”).

THE WASHINGTON POST, in its May 25th, 2020, article “The COVID-19 Shutdown Will Cost Americans Millions of Years of Life”, states: “Our governmental COVID-19 mitigation policy of broad societal lockdown focuses on containing the spread of the disease at all costs … Although well-intentioned, the lockdown was imposed without consideration of its consequences beyond those directly from the pandemic. The policies have created the greatest global economic disruption in history, with trillions of dollars of lost economic output. These financial losses have been falsely portrayed as purely economic … These policies will cause devastating non-economic consequences that will total millions of accumulated years of life lost in the United States, far beyond what the virus itself has caused. Pandemics have afflicted humankind throughout history. They devastated the Roman and Byzantine empires, Medieval Europe, China and India, and they continue to the present day despite medical progress. The past century has witnessed three pandemics with at least 100,000 U.S. fatalities: The “Spanish Flu,” 1918-1919, with between 20 million and 50 million fatalities worldwide, including 675,000 in the U.S.; the “Asian Flu,” 1957-1958, with about 1.1 million deaths worldwide, 116,000 of those in the U.S.; and the “Hong Kong Flu,” 1968-1972, with about 1 million people worldwide, including 100,000 in the U.S. So far, the current pandemic has produced almost 100,000 U.S. deaths, but the reaction of a near-complete economic shutdown is unprecedented …

“Lost income results in lost lives as the stresses of unemployment and providing basic needs increase the incidence of suicide, alcohol or drug abuse, and stress-induced illnesses. These effects are particularly severe on the lower-income populace, as they are more likely to lose their jobs, and mortality rates are much higher for lower-income individuals. Statistically, every $10 million to $24 million lost in U.S. incomes results in one additional death. One portion of this effect is through unemployment, which leads to an average increase in mortality of at least 60%. That translates into 7,200 lives lost per month among the 36 million newly unemployed Americans, over 40% of whom are not expected to regain their jobs. In addition, many small business owners are near financial collapse, creating lost wealth that results in mortality increases of 50%. With an average estimate of one additional lost life per $17 million income loss, that would translate to 65,000 lives lost in the U.S. for each month because of the economic shutdown.

“In addition to lives lost because of lost income, lives also are lost due to delayed or foregone health care imposed by the shutdown and the fear it creates among patients ... about half of their patients have not appeared for treatment of disease which, left untreated, risks brain hemorrhage, paralysis or death. Emergency stroke evaluations are down 40%. Of the 650,000 cancer patients, an estimated half are missing their treatments. Of the 150,000 new cancer cases typically discovered each month in the U.S., most ― as elsewhere in the world ― are not being diagnosed, and two-thirds to three-fourths of routine cancer screenings are not happening because of shutdown policies and fear among the population … The implications of treatment delays result in 8,000 U.S. deaths for each month of the shutdown, or about 120,000 years of remaining life. Missed strokes contribute an additional loss of 100,000 years of life for each month; late cancer diagnoses lose 250,000 years of remaining life for each month; missing living-donor transplants, another 5,000 years of life per month. These unintended consequences of missed health care amount to more than 500,000 lost years of life per month, not including all the other known skipped care. If we only consider unemployment-related fatalities from the economic shutdown, that would total at least an additional 7,200 lives per month. Assuming these deaths occur proportionally across the ages of current U.S. mortality data, and equally among men and women, this amounts to more than 200,000 lost years of life for each month of the economic shutdown.

“In comparison, COVID-19 fatalities have fallen disproportionately on the elderly, particularly in nursing homes, and those with co-morbidities. Based on the expected remaining lifetimes of these COVID-19 patients, and given that 40% of deaths are in nursing homes, the disease has been responsible for 800,000 lost years of life so far [in a total of 6 months]. Considering only the losses of life from missed health care and unemployment due solely to the lockdown policy, we conservatively estimate that the national lockdown is responsible for at least 700,000 lost years of life every month, or about 1.5 million so far [in only 2 months] ― already far surpassing the COVID-19 total. Policymakers combating the effects of COVID-19 must recognize and consider the full impact of their decisions. They need to be aware of the devastating effects in terms of lost life from shutting down significant parts of the economy. They need to widely inform the public of these serious consequences and reassure them of their concern for all human life by strongly articulating the rationale for reopening society. To end the loss of life from the economic lockdown, businesses as well as K-12 schools, public transportation, parks and beaches should smartly reopen with enhanced hygiene and science-based protection warnings for any in the high-risk population. For most of the country, that reopening should occur now, without any unnecessary fear-based restrictions, many of which repeat the error of disregarding the evidence. By following a thoughtful analysis that finally recognizes all available actions and their consequences, we can save millions of years of American life.”

RON PAUL INSTITUTE writer Adam Dicks, in a May 23rd, 2020, article, entitled “Will the Texas Supreme Court Follow the Wisconsin Supreme Court in Rejecting Much of the Coronavirus Crackdown?” wrote: “Last week the Wisconsin Supreme Court became the first among the highest state courts in America to void much of a state government’s Coronavirus crackdown. With legal challenges being pursued in response to liberty suppression―through the expanding of government power across America―in the name of countering Coronavirus, expect other states’ top courts soon to be considering the legality of state and local crackdowns as well. A declaration earlier this month by four of the nine justices of the Texas Supreme Court suggests that there may be strong support in that court for taking similar action as did the Wisconsin Supreme Court. In a concurring opinion, Justices Blacklock, Guzman, Boyd, and Devine reminded everyone that the ‘Constitution is not suspended when the government declares a state of disaster’ … This opinion was a message—the Constitution still applies, and the courts will enforce it … As the four Texas Supreme Court Justices note, ‘Any government―that has made the grave decision to suspend the liberties of a free people during a health emergency―should welcome the opportunity to demonstrate—both to its citizens and to the courts—that its chosen measures are absolutely necessary to combat a threat of overwhelming severity’ and that ‘less restrictive measures cannot adequately address the threat.’”

THE MISES INSTITUTE (Alabama) writer Zachary Yost, in a May 20th,2020, article, entitled “The Shutdown May Soon Collapse in Pennsylvania Thanks to Local Resistance”, wrote: “Pennsylvania has been greatly disturbed by the COVID-19 pandemic and the chaos that has resulted from the state government’s attempts to handle the situation. On March 16th, Governor Wolf ordered that all “non-essential” businesses be closed for at least two weeks. They are still closed today, and as a result, 1.8 million Pennsylvanians have filed for unemployment. At the end last year, the state estimated that there were roughly 6 million employed persons in Pennsylvania … Nearly a third of people who were working in December are now out of work.

“Governor Wolf, having assumed emergency powers … revealed to lawmakers … on May 6th, that of the roughly 3,100 virus deaths by that date, 68% had occurred in nursing homes and similar care facilities, that the average age of those who had passed was 79 (in a state where the average life expectancy is 78.5 years), and that 84.4% of the victims suffered from one to four comorbidities. (!!!!) These shocking figures are even more tragic in light of the fact that the state’s aggressive plan for protecting nursing homes was never fully implemented. Although the administration apparently lacked the ability to enact their own plan for protecting nursing homes, Wolf did have the time to make sure to include radical progressive demands in his state recovery plan―such as an increase of the minimum wage to $12, which would be set to grow to $15, and an expansion of mandatory paid leave policies.

“With such chaos, confusion, and incompetence in the background, it is little wonder that there is a growing sense of rebellion among both the inhabitants and local government officials throughout the state … Local officials also pointed out that many residents who work in the surrounding counties will be free to travel in and out of Beaver to work, defeating the entire purpose of keeping the county locked down. What’s more, the district attorney announced that his office would not be prosecuting any violations of the shutdown orders and had advised all local police departments to not get involved in state enforcement orders. This defiance was echoed by two other counties in the central part of the state … whose officials released statements effectively saying that they would no longer participate in the enforcement of shutdown orders. The county sheriffs of two additional central counties also released statements saying that their offices would not participate in any enforcement activities. A few days later, these counties have been joined by an additional eight counties … With nearly a third of the state now out of work, such rebellion is not surprising in the least.

“Of course, Governor Wolf did not take such defiance lightly and unleashed a torrent of threats and abuse on the recalcitrant offenders, declaring that they had “decided to surrender to the enemy” and that they were “choosing to desert in the face of the enemy, in the middle of a war.” He then threatened to withhold … federal funds from any counties that rebelled, and then went even further, warning businesses that he would unleash the regulatory goons on them to make them bend the knee. Restaurants' liquor licenses would be suspended, any business that re-opened in defiance, would no longer have business liability insurance, and they could risk losing certificates of occupancy and health certificates. However, having already pushed thousands of businesses to the brink of extinction, it seems unlikely that Wolf’s threats have much persuasive power. The state simply doesn’t have the resources to hunt down every rebellious business owner … The situation in Pennsylvania is continuing to evolve, but it seems clear that Governor Wolf’s authority is collapsing by the day. The governor may issue all the orders he desires, but without the cooperation of the lower levels of government and the people themselves, they are toothless. In the unlikely event that he desired to escalate the situation to enforce his emergency decrees, he would lack the resources to realistically do so … Even if he tried, local district attorneys have already indicated that they will not prosecute such cases.”

JUDGE EUGENE LUCCI, a state judge in Cleveland Ohio’s Lake County Court of Common Pleas, responding to a May 8th, 2020, lawsuit filed by the 1851 Center for Constitutional Law on behalf of 35 gyms, ruled that Ohio's COVID-19 lockdown is illegal, because it exceeds the powers granted by the statute under which it was imposed. Judge Eugene Lucci told Ohio Department of Health Director, Amy Acton, to stop penalizing the plaintiffs or similar businesses for violating the lockdown, provided that they operate in compliance with all applicable safety regulations. Lucci concluded that Ohio's lockdown does not meet the legal requirements for “isolation,” or a “quarantine,” stating that a quarantine is supposed to last only as long as the usual incubation period of the disease—two to 14 days, in the case of COVID-19. However, Amy Acton wanted to criminalize a wide range of previously legal conduct, threatening violators with a $750 fine and up to 90 days in jail. Judge Lucci ruled that “the director has quarantined the entire people of the state of Ohio, for much more than 14 days. The director has no statutory authority to close all businesses, including the plaintiffs' gyms, which she deems non-essential for a period of two months. She has acted in an impermissibly arbitrary, unreasonable, and oppressive manner and without any procedural safeguards.” He added that Acton’s measures are leading to “a diminishment of public morale, and a feeling that one unelected individual could exercise such unfettered power to force everyone to obey impermissibly oppressive, vague, arbitrary, and unreasonable rules that the director devised and revised, and modified and reversed, whenever and as she pleases, without any legislative guidance. The public would be left with feelings that their government is not accountable to them.”

SHERRIFS START TO REFUSE LOCKDOWN LAWS. Under Washington State’s statewide Coronavirus stay-at-home order, residents can’t go to the barber or work out at the gym. But in Snohomish County—which has seen more than 2,150 cases--Sheriff Adam Fortney says his deputies won’t stop people who break the order, saying: “Along with other elected Sheriffs around our state, the Snohomish County Sheriff’s Office will not be enforcing an order preventing religious freedoms or constitutional rights.” Elsewhere in Washington State, Franklin County Sheriff J.D. Raymond issued a letter saying his department wouldn’t enforce the order issued by another Democratic Governor, Jay Inslee: “Neither I, nor my office, will enforce any arrests or fines regarding the operation of privately owned businesses.” More and more governors are facing additional challenges at the local law enforcement level. Four sheriffs in Michigan have refused to enforce the stay-at-home order issued by Democratic Governor Gretchen Whitmer. Two Wisconsin sheriffs have said they won’t enforce that State’s order. A Southern California, Riverside County Sheriff Chad Bianco made it clear that he will not enforce lockdown orders during the COVID-19 pandemic. Sheriff Bianco delivered a rousing speech where he proclaimed that he refuses to enforce the state-mandated stay-at-home order, because he won't “make criminals out of business owners, single moms, and otherwise healthy individuals for exercising their constitutional rights.” Two Arizona Sheriffs―Doug Schuster of Mohave County and Mark Lamb of Pinal County―said they will not enforce Governor Doug Ducey's (Republican) stay-at-home order. Both Schuster and Lamb agreed to talk with residents about violating the governor's order but they would not arrest those who refuse to comply. Virginia State’s Culpepper County Sheriff Scott Jenkins has rejected Democrat governor, Ralph Northam’s draconian lockdown order in the state and is refusing to enforce the mandatory lockdown on certain businesses in the northern part of the state. In New Mexico, Chaves County Sherriff Mike Herrington has told people they have little to fear should they violate mask-wearing orders: “My department will not be out citing anyone for not wearing a mask. I will not be enforcing any of those orders.”

In the State of Maine, Franklin County Sheriff Scott Nichols said it best when he declared his department will not be “setting up a police state” to enforce Democrat Governor Janet Mills’ stay-at-home order. Nichols said he was clearly mindful of the seriousness of the COVID-19 pandemic, but plans to use discretion in enforcing the Governor’s measure. In a written statement, Sheriff Nichols, one of Maine’s sixteen county sheriffs said: “We will not be setting up a Police State. PERIOD. The Sheriff’s Office will not purposefully go out and stop vehicles because they are on the road or stop and ask why people are out and about. To do so puts our officers at risk. This is not Nazi Germany or Soviet Russia where you are asked for your papers!” In Texas, the Houston Police Officers’ Union declared Wednesday that its members would refrain from enforcing local County Judge Lina Hidalgo’s ruling deeming it mandatory for any individual over the age of 10 to wear a mask in public. The Police Union stated: “The Houston Police Officers’ Union believes everyone should be wearing a mask in public, in order to protect themselves from the virus and we are encouraging all of our officers to wear a mask. However, we draw the line at the draconian measures Hidalgo has decided to engage in. Our officers work every single day to bridge the gap with our community and earn their trust, we will not stand idly by and allow Hidalgo to tear that bridge down, with her horrific leadership!” Sheriffs across the nation are standing up against laws they believe are unconstitutional. They took an oath to uphold the Constitution and are doing everything in their power to preserve and protect their constituents' rights.

St. Augustinewrote: “An unjust law is no law at all.” St. Thomas Aquinas defined a just law as one that is grounded in reason, not the will of the lawmaker. Abortion clinics are open. Targets and Walmarts are open―and not just the grocery and pharmaceutical sections, but all the store. Home Depots are open. Marijuana dispensaries and liquor stores are open. Even some casinos are now open. Yet, at the same time, churches are CLOSED. Only an authority that is godless (churches closed) and murderous (abortion clinics open) would rule in this way. Fortunately, some churches are taking the totalitarian lawmakers to court―and are winning in increasing numbers―which has led to the President demanding that governors remove the totalitarian restrictions from churches. By Pentecost Sunday (May 21st, 2020), most churches will have resumed church services, though many will still be limited by maximum attendance thresholds.

► LIE ― Churches closed, Less Important Places Are Open. [comments to be added] Bread of Life and bread of world, Man does not live by bread alone

► LIE ― Hypocrisy of Selective Social Interaction [comments to be added]

► LIE ― Closure of Businesses [comments to be added]

► LIE ― Virus of Pornography Promoted and Allowed to Circulate [comments to be added]

► LIE ― Follow the Money! Who Profits?

DR. SCOTT JENSEN, a Minnesota family physician who is also a Republican state senator, reacted to Dr. Anthony Fauci's response to a question about the potential for the number of Coronavirus deaths being “padded,” in which Fauci, the NIAID director, described the prevalence of “conspiracy theories” during “challenging” times in public health. Jensen commented: “I would remind him that anytime health care intersects with dollars it gets awkward. Right now Medicare has determined that if you have a COVID-19 admission to the hospital you’ll get paid $13,000 [which is much more than is given for other disease hospitalizations]. If that COVID-19 patient goes on a ventilator, you get $39,000; three times as much. Nobody can tell me, after 35 years in the world of medicine, that sometimes those kinds of things [have] impact on what we do. Some physicians really have a bent towards public health and they will put down influenza or whatever because that’s their preference. I try to stay very specific, very precise. If I know I’ve got pneumonia, that’s what’s going on the death certificate. I’m not going to add stuff just because it’s convenient.”

DR. MERYLL NASS, a physician in Ellsworth, Maine, provided scientifically referenced testimony to the Massachusetts legislature, December 3rd, 2019, when it was considering legislation to eliminate the vaccine exemption. In her December 2019 testimony, Nass pointed out that: “There is no crisis (no epidemic of deaths or disabilities) from infectious diseases caused by lack of vaccinations … The elephant in the auditorium today is Pharma profits … The pharmaceutical industry has undertaken a very ambitious campaign to legislate away vaccine exemptions in the United States and Canada. France, Italy and Germany have rescinded vaccine exemptions too, suggesting the campaign is worldwide."

THE NEW YORK TIMES, in an article on March 18th, 2020, under the headline “Drug Companies Will Make a Killing From Coronavirus”, states: “Unless we fix the system, American taxpayers will get gouged on a vaccine they paid to produce ... The search for treatments and vaccines to curb transmission of the new Coronavirus is in overdrive … Since the 2003 SARS outbreak, the United States has spent nearly $700 million of taxpayer money on Coronavirus research — more than any other country — through the National Institutes of Health. Yet the question right now for Americans — thousands of whom are forced to ration their insulin and face astronomical bills for live-saving drugs — is not only when these treatments and vaccines will become available, but at what price ... Health Secretary Alex Azar recently said that he could not guarantee Coronavirus treatments or vaccines would be affordable, despite taxpayers’ significant investment in their development … One way was spelled out in a letter, sent on February 20th, by 46 lawmakers. It demands that Coronavirus vaccines and treatments, developed with taxpayer money, should be produced without giving an exclusive license to private manufacturers. Yet that is not how our system works. Instead, the government grants exclusivity to pharmaceutical companies to conduct later stage drug development on publicly funded inventions, without requiring that these drugs be widely affordable or accessible. These exclusive licenses allow drug companies to enjoy a monopoly and charge exorbitant prices for medical technologies developed with public funds.”

► LIE ― The Nefarious Agenda, Direction and Consequences of the ‘Plannedemic’ [comments to be added]
THE NEW "MORE" ― Politicians and governments are in the business of “MORE”―they are always promising “more” things for the people. Yet this politics of “MORE” has taken a “left-turn” with this Coronavirus Plannedemic. More restrictions on liberty, more surveillance, more fear-mongering, more exaggerations of dangers, more panic, more criminalization of normal activities, more unemployment, more poverty, more shortages, more hunger, more starvation, more twisted stats and data, more vaccinations, more pseudo-science, more pseudo-solutions, more dependence on messianic governments, more totalitarian measures, more censroship, more compromise of the Faith and its principles.

► LIE ― Analogies Showing the Ridiculousness of the Current Situation [comments to be added]

Article 17
A "Second Wave" in Reality OR A "Second Wave" on Paper?

This article is currently being written. Sections will be posted as they are completed. Please check back later.

"Second Wave" Preached a Long Time Ago
Already back in late spring and early summer, the medical community and common folk were talking about a “Second Wave” of Coronavirus or Covid-19.

► In April of 2020, the medical journal The Lancet was already talking-up the possibility of a “second wave” somewhere around mid-summer to late-summer.

► In May of 2020, Dr. Marc Lipsitch, professor of epidemiology at the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health and director of the Center for Communicable Disease Dynamics warned that the Coronavirus would produce a “Second Wave” in the fall of 2020: “I hope that the summer weather will help,” he said, but added that his research indicated that the warmer weather will only reduce transmission rates by about 20%. “That’s only enough to slow it down, but not enough to stop it.” Dr. Lipsitch said that despite hopes that summer will bring continued relief from the spread of the virus, “fall will be very much like the spring,” and the usual pattern of Coronaviruses is likely continue with new transmission peaking in November and cases peaking in December, adding: “We will have a harder time controlling Coronavirus in the fall ... and we will all be very tired of social distancing and other tactics.”

► In June of 2020, Dr. J. Alexander Navarro, assistant director of the Center for the History of Medicine at the University of Michigan, stoked the “Second Wave” fires by comparing the Coronavirus to the Spanish Flu Pandemic of 1918-1919. The first wave began in March 1918 and eased by the summer. The second wave came in the fall, followed by a third wave during the winter and spring of 1919. The first wave “was not very deadly,” said Navarro, “It was about as bad as ordinary strains of seasonal influenza that had been circulating up until that point.” The second wave was the deadliest, and that may have been due to mutations that increased the virus’s lethality, although scientists say this is speculative and that such mutations more typically take much longer to develop and spread. The second wave “slowed towards the end of November, in part because more stringent social distancing measures were put in place,” said Kenneth Davis, author of More Deadly Than War: The Hidden History of the Spanish Flu and the First World War. “When those were relaxed, a third wave commenced in the winter and spring of 1919.” The third wave lasted into early March, and some suggest there was a fourth wave during the winter of 1920. Each was less deadly than the one before it, Navarro said, although there were regional differences in severity. The decline in lethality after the second wave was probably shaped in part by the declining number of people who hadn’t already been infected, Navarro said. When infections in a population become sufficiently widespread, that can slow the further spread due to “herd immunity.”

► In July of 2020, The Medical Futurist painted a grim future: “Will there be a second wave of Covid-19? In short? Yes, there most certainly will. Or, looking at it from another perspective, there might not be a second wave as the first one won’t end. The search is still on for a vaccine and it certainly won’t be ready by the time experts say the second wave hits the stage. Technically, to talk about a second wave, the first wave needs to end. And in order to say one wave has ended, the virus would have to be brought under control and cases have to fall substantially. In some parts of the world we’ve seen that happening, while we also see record numbers in new infections elsewhere – so the disease is on fire again. Epidemiologists use the metaphor of ocean waves, when trying to explain the typical run-off of a virus. A hundred years ago, the Spanish Flu also had a second wave. And it was far deadlier than the first one. Researchers are after the fact whether you can catch the Coronavirus again after you’ve already had it – and, regrettably, this seems to be the case. Antibodies, in some diseases can prevent re-infection. Unfortunately, it is still unclear if that stands for Coronavirus. How long antibodies stay in one’s blood is also unknown. A new study from King’s College London inspired a swarm of headlines suggesting that immunity might vanish in only a few months; while other studies claim the opposite. If there’s a chance to re-infection, herd immunity is out of the question. However, none of the studies are definitive, and there’s still a lot to be learned about this novel virus. Anthony Fauci even warned in an interview that the Coronavirus might not ever be eradicated …

“This leaves us with the vaccine as the safe solution. Researchers around the world are currently developing more than 160 types of vaccines against the virus. There are already over two dozens of them in human trials. Experts warn, however, that even with a vaccine produced, it’ll take a long time to have everyone vaccinated, starting with people with immune deficiencies, medical workers and the elderly. And then there are the resistant masses who refuse to get vaccinated. In the U.S. alone it is an estimated 60 million people. Our battle with COVID-19 goes on over the majority of the year with travel restrictions, masks and social distancing. Most likely the rest of this year will continue to be about our struggle with this virus, until the vaccine becomes available. Currently, there’s a new surge in a number of countries: from Australia to India, Ukraine, Brazil or Israel. But now Europe’s main holiday time is approaching. Their numbers are about to rise as well, possibly leading to renewed lockdowns or restrictions. We already see it in a number of countries. In the U.S., numbers in the most affected states are rising again sharply, but it isn’t a second wave. A new surge can be mitigated by the better response. Now that governments, hospitals, doctors and even people know what they are facing, the next peak will definitely be easier than the first one. If not, then something has gone seriously wrong.”

► In September of 2020, Dr. Eili Klein, an epidemiologist at Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, said: “My feeling is that there is a wave coming, and it’s not so much whether it’s coming―but how big is it going to be!” Dr. Andrew Noymer, an epidemiologist at the University of California at Irvine, warned: “I firmly believe we will see distinct second waves, including in places that are done with their first waves. New York City, I’m looking at you. I expect fall waves starting in mid-October and getting worse as fall heads into winter, and reaching a crescendo certainly after the election. Some places will peak around Thanksgiving, some places will peak around Christmas, some places not until January and February.”

► In October of 2020, The National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) epidemiology expert, Dr. Anthony Fauci, said there is no such thing as the second or the third wave of the Coronavirus pandemic, because we were never really over the first wave anyway. Speaking of the mid-October surge in daily COVID-19 cases across the U.S., Fauci said it’s “more of an exacerbation of the original first wave, because we never really cleared and got down to a very low baseline, which I would consider to be less than 10,000 cases per day, maybe just a couple thousand a day.” COVID-19 cases in the U.S. began to spike on October 22nd, when more than 70,000 people tested positive in a single day. New cases climbed further to 85,000 on October 23rd, marking the highest single-day infections, up to late October, since the Coronavirus outbreak began. Until then, daily cases had hovered around 40,000 for about a month, up from the previous baseline of just under 20,000, which was still an alarmingly high level. Fauci explained: “If you look at the chart, we’ve never really had waves, in the sense of up and then down to a good baseline. It’s been up and wavering up and down till now, we are at the highest baseline we’ve ever been, which is really quite precarious. It’s kind of semantics if you want to call the third wave or an extended first wave. No matter how you look at it, it’s not good news.”

► In November of 2020, eight days after the U.S. hit 100,000 cases in a single day for the first time on November 4th, the numbers further increased topped 160,000 on November 12th. The New York Times, in its November 15th article entitled “Covid-19: Pandemic Shatters More Records in U.S., as States and Cities Tighten Restrictions” reported: “Public health officials in the United States announced more than 160,000 new Coronavirus cases on Thursday (November 12th), the first day over 150,000 since the pandemic began — an alarming record that came just over a week after the country first experienced 100,000 cases in a single day. The pandemic has risen to crisis levels in much of the nation, especially the Midwest, as hospital executives warn of dwindling bed space and as coroners deploy mobile morgues. More than 100,000 Coronavirus cases have been announced nationwide every day since November 4th, and six of the last nine days have broken the previous record. Hospitalizations for Covid-19 also set a record on Thursday, climbing to 67,096, according to the Covid Tracking Project. It was the third straight day of record numbers, and the figure has doubled in just five weeks. Deaths are rising, too, with more than 1,000 on average each day. In Illinois, where more than 75,000 cases have emerged in the last week, Governor J.B. Pritzker suggested that he could soon impose a stay-at-home order. “We’re running out of time and we’re running out of options,” said Mr. Pritzker, who scolded local officials in parts of his state for disregarding mask rules and restrictions on businesses. Case numbers are trending upward in 46 states and holding relatively steady in four. No state is seeing cases decline. Thirty-one states — from Alaska and Idaho in the West to Connecticut and New Hampshire in the East — added more cases in the seven-day period ending Wednesday than in any previous week of the pandemic. Vermont, Utah and Oregon were among at least 10 states with single-day case records on Thursday. But the outlook is especially dire in the Great Lakes region. Pennsylvania, Indiana and Minnesota all exceeded their previous single-day records on Thursday by more than 1,000 cases. Governor Mike DeWine of Ohio warned that hospitalizations had soared to record levels. Wisconsin surpassed 300,000 known cases this week, an increase of more than 130,000 in just a month. “Covid-19 is everywhere in our state: It is bad everywhere, and it is getting worse everywhere,” said Julie Willems Van Dijk, the deputy secretary of the Wisconsin Department of Health Services.”

Dr. Fauci warned in an interview that “the Coronavirus might not ever be eradicated.” Scary thought, huh? Yet on “Good Morning America” Dr. Fauci said that officials hope that “ordinary citizens should be able” to get a vaccine in the spring. He stated: “Certainly, it is not going to be a pandemic for a lot longer, because I believe the vaccines are going to turn that around! Help is on the way―but it isn’t here yet!” Hurray! Hurray! Thank you Dr. Fauci, our savior! Thank you Big Pharma, our redeemers!

Dr. Lisa Lockerd Maragakis, MD, MPH, an infectious disease specialist at Johns Hopkins Medicine, chimes in saying that about 70% of the population needs to be immune to this Coronavirus before herd immunity can work. People might be immune from the Coronavirus, at least for a while, if they have already had it, but we don’t know this yet. A widely available, safe and effective vaccine may not be available for months. Without a vaccine, most doctors and scientists agree that a herd immunity approach of letting the virus “take its course” is not acceptable. Letting the Coronavirus circulate freely among the public would result in hundreds of thousands of deaths and millions more people left with lasting lung, heart, brain or kidney damage.

A summary of the above quotes makes frightening reading―the stuff of nightmares―which is exactly what they want to achieve by their fear-mongering propaganda. They want those key words and alleged “facts” to sink-in: “Coronavirus might not ever be eradicated … Pandemic rises to crisis levels … 100,000 Coronavirus cases nationwide every day since November 4th … Six of the last nine days break previous record ... Third straight day of record numbers, the figure has doubled in just five weeks ... 10 states with single-day case records … Illinois with 75,000 cases in one week, Governor Pritzker says ‘We’re running out of time and we’re running out of options! … Outlook especially dire in the Great Lakes region. Pennsylvania, Indiana and Minnesota exceed their previous single-day records by more than 1,000 cases. Wisconsin had 300,000 known cases in one week, an increase of more than 130,000 in just a month! Governor Mike DeWine of Ohio warned that hospitalizations had soared to record levels! ... Midwest hospitals warn of dwindling bed space! … Hospitalizations climb to 67,096, the third straight day of record numbers, the figure doubled in just five weeks … Hundreds of thousands of deaths [over 250,000] and millions more people left with lasting lung, heart, brain or kidney damage … Coroners deploy mobile morgues!” Scary, huh? Or more like scary propaganda!

Sounds Convincing! Is It?
You have just read one side of the story―the mainstream media version and the mainstream medical version. Notice how the tension, the drama, the threatening dire consequences are vamped and ramped up with each passing month―to the crescendo of “hundreds of thousands of deaths and millions more people left with lasting lung, heart, brain or kidney damage.” Just as in any judicial court case or trial―one does not just listen to the prosecuting attorney, but also the defense attorney. As they say, “There are two sides to every story!” So what is the other side to this story? Here are some surprising―even shocking―facts and stats that will astound you.

If you are watching the mainstream news during November 2020, you might get the impression that never before has there been such a run on hospital bed space in the history of America. Yet the media hyperbole does not match the data. If you take time to find and study the data, you will see, in fact, that the general level of hospitalization is not that much higher than a flu season, even in hard-hit areas, and most likely lower in other areas. Justin Hart, co-founder of COVID data website RationalGround.com, posted his analysis showing that the burden on hospitals is probably not much more than a typical flu season. Using data from the American Hospital Association data hub and the HHS Protect Public Data Hub, he compared the current hospitalization level (November 1st to November 9th) to the average level over the three-year period for November 1st to November 9th from 2016 through 2018.

The above results show that nationwide there is only a 4.7% increase in the 2020 (November 1st to 9th) numbers above the three-year average level from the November 1st to 9th levels for the years 2016, 2017 & 2018. It is true that in some states, there has been a double-digit increase in the percentage of “beds in use” over the average, but those are states that were not hit badly until now. In fact, in most of the states in the Great Plains and mountain West, they experienced lower-than-average hospitalizations throughout the pandemic. So, for them to experience 15%-30% increases at the worst six- to eight-week peak as they get their first major wave (as everyone will experience, regardless of their policies) is not exactly reflective of the pandemic of a millennium. When you look at the peak weeks of the 2018 flu season, you clearly see the same explosion of numbers in some states, yet nobody even knew about it, nor talked about, nor sensationalized it.

Congress has thrown billions of dollars at the hospitals, and they receive higher reimbursement rates for treating COVID-19 patients. However, many of the cases are not necessarily clinical level. Undoubtedly, in the worst cases, patients are critically ill, but the panic surrounding this virus creates a self-fulfilling prophecy of more people coming to the Emergency Room and being admitted. The financial incentives for hospitals certainly exacerbate this trend.

One particular change in policy that might be responsible for some of the inflation since October is the fact that they are now including those admitted to “observation” beds in the COVID hospitalization count. On October 6th, 2020, Health and Human Services (HHS) updated its guidance for hospital data reporting. When reporting “total hospitalized adult suspected or confirmed positive COVID patients,” they added a clause, not included in previous guidance, urging hospitals to “include those in observation beds.” However, those in “observation beds” are not COVID patients ― they are merely being observed for potential COVID symptoms.

In case you thought this was just technical advice to hospitals, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) sent a letter to hospitals in October, threatening harsh penalties for those who do not report this data. “Failure to report the specified data needed to support broader surveillance of COVID-19 may lead to the imposition of the remedy to terminate a provider’s participation from the Medicare and Medicaid programs,” warned CMS in a memo to all hospitals that serve Medicare and Medicaid patients.

Thus, if you combine the carrot and the stick — both the financial incentive to pad the COVID numbers and the threat of loss of funds for not reporting them — why would a hospital ever err on the side of underreporting and not over-reporting? Remember, these incentives are driving the data reporting, which in turn is controlling the destiny of our lives. Report more COVID numbers and you get more money! Which hospital wouldn’t want more money?

Falsely Enticing People Into Hospital
There are many COVID patients being admitted into hospital that do not need hospital care―they are mildly ill and will recover at home, just they recover from a regular flu, with rest and medication. Aha! MEDICIATION! Though they say that there is no known cure for COVID―and they ridicule all the cures available in God’s pharmacy (nature)―they nevertheless have devised a way of inflating their hospital admission numbers (thus creating panic in people) by offering the only FDA-approved drug for COVID-19 treatment ― Remdesivir ― and, in order to obtain it, you need to be hospitalized for at least three days. “Hey! Do you want something to help you with your COVID? We have just the thing for you! But you must come to our hospital for a few days ― and then it’s all yours!” Remdesivir was proven to be completely ineffective by a massive study conducted by the World Health Organization. Nevertheless, it is the only FDA-approved drug for COVID-19 treatment. Come into our hospital for a few days and we will give you your (useless) Remdesivir! The approval of this drug took place on October 22nd, 2020, which would also explain the recent surge in hospital numbers since that time. Clearly, there are many people being admitted who don’t necessarily need to be there ― yet nobody is aware of that and it serves to inflate the hospital admission numbers and heightens the fear among the people.

On November 18th, 2020, the Miami Herald reported that out of 898 patients who tested positive in Miami’s public hospitals last week, 52% of them “were admitted for other reasons [than COVID], largely to emergency rooms, without typical COVID-19 signs.” In other words, more than half of those who are now recorded as COVID hospitalizations are really admitted for anything ― ranging from car accidents and broken bones to heart attacks, kidney stones, and abdominal pain. That is simply astounding. The Miami Herald uses this fact to sow more panic by suggesting that it is a sign of growing spread. Well, no kidding! This virus is everywhere and is as prolific as the flu is during flu season! But that’s the point. Everyone is going to be exposed to this virus, and only a tiny percentage become sick enough to legitimately be hospitalized from it. However, during a period of ubiquitous spread, a large percentage of those in the hospital will test positive, or even contract it after entering the hospital. Imagine if we counted everyone in the hospital during flu season as a flu case―even if they showed no symptoms and were admitted for other reasons.

The overwhelming majority of cases are very mild or asymptomatic, but by panicking over the virus and treating every COVID case (even the false positive tests) like a Stage 4 cancer, we are creating a false illusion of straining and overwhelming hospitals with both make-believe numbers and logistical problems with over-aggressive quarantining of patients and staff. “Stupid is as stupid does!” ― and the public does “buy-into” that stupidity! This has long-since been a “paper-pandemic” ― whereby the disease has climbed to disastrous proportions on paper, but not in reality.

On August 26th, 2020, the CDC itself (the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention) released data showing 94% of people who had died during the COVID-19 pandemic in the U.S. died “WITH” the virus, not “FROM” it. Only 6% had COVID-19 listed as the sole cause of death on the death certificate. Hence, the real death toll―meaning those who unarguably died as a direct result of the infection ― is only around 15,000 ― and not the inflated media reports of over 250,000.

“For deaths with conditions or causes, in addition to COVID-19, on average, there were 2.6 additional conditions [that is to say, already pre-existing illnesses or co-morbidities in the patient] or causes per death,” the CDC stated. This is an important distinction. Yet mainstream media continues to report that over 250,000 have died “FROM” COVID-19 in the U.S. ― thereby increasing national fear, so that they can implement their lockdowns and other future strategies to limit our personal freedoms and liberty.

Article 18
The Mask is Masking Reality

This article is currently being written. Sections will be posted as they are completed. Please check back later.

“What’s a Mask?” You Ask
What’s is a mask? What’s in a mask? What’s behind a mask? If you consult your dictionary―then you will get a definition along the following lines:

► NOUN: Mask
a covering for all or part of the face, worn as a disguise, or to amuse or terrify other people.

► VERB: To Mask
to conceal someone or something with a covering;
to conceal something from view
to make something indistinct or imperceptible
to hide or conceal something, such as one’s motives or feelings
to cover something for protection
to disguise one’s true character or intentions
to take part in a masquerade

Mass Mask Task
The “mask” has become the symbol or advertisement for Covid-19 or SARS-CoV-2 or whatever other name you like to give to the hyped-up, ubiquitous, super-spreader, “you don’t know you’ve got it”, one hundred symptom, universal killer virus. It is funny to see in the above definition of “mask” the words “to amuse or terrify other people”. Those are exactly the sentiments generated by the sight of most of obedient mask wearers throughout the world―who are told to wear it more and more, and to wear it almost everywhere―even outside in the fresh air, and even when alone! It serves to terrify some persons―reminding them that the virus, like the fictional characters “Bigfoot” or “Grinch” is out to get you! While others find such gullible obedience highly amusing.

There used to be a time when the police would be called if anyone walked into a bank or a store all-masked-up! Nowadays they call for the police if you enter a bank or a store WITHOUT A MASK! Funny how times and customs change! The “masked-man” has gone from being a bandit and a “baddie” to being a hero and a “goodie”. We have gone from risking arrest for wearing a mask, to now risking a fine if you don’t wear a mask! You could say: “What have you got to lose by wearing a mask?” or perhaps that should be: “What have you got to hide in wearing that mask?”

The question arises: “What lies behind the mask?” or should that be rephrased to: “What lies are hiding behind that mask?” The sane medical experts, the honest medical experts, the medical experts who have not sold their souls to “false science” and “false narratives” will tell you quite clearly, quite bluntly, quite honestly that the MASKS ARE USELESS AGAINST VIRUSES!

Fauci, Biden & Co. are all hiding behind the mask of “false science” while chanting to the rest of the world: “Follow the science!” They are liars, masquerading as caring people, who are masking the truth and using the mask-wearing edict as a means of forcing the nation into psychological submission to a falsehood they little understand and yet readily and gullibly swallow. Our Lord said: “Not in bread alone doth man live, but in every word that proceedeth from the mouth of God” (Matthew 4:4). Today, it seems that faced with Covid-19, man cannot live and survive alone, but must live by every word that proceeds from the mouth of Dr. Fauci―yet Fauci’s mouth is now, more often than not, a masked mouth, and a masked mouth that is concealing and keeping out of sight the truths that everyone has a right to know. Fauci was raised in a devout traditional Catholic family and in Jesuit schools and colleges―but today he classifies himself as a humanist. Biden was also raised in a traditional Catholic family―but today he supports abortion and the LGBT movement, himself having presiding as minister in marrying two men in the White House Chapel. Funny how things change! Fortunately God and truth―unlike Fauci and Biden―never change!

The anti-mask brigade is growing worldwide, as one doctor after another, once virologist or epidemiologist after another speaks out against the “false science” or “lack of science” that is guiding the worldwide governmental mandatory mask measures.

Why Enforce Ineffective Mask Rules?
A viral video posted September 23rd, 2020, features the violent arrest of an Ohio mom at a local football game, ostensibly for not wearing her mask in the stands. The video shows a police officer tasing Alecia Kitts. Also clearly on the video is footage showing that the officer who tased Kitts had his own mask off, under his chin, from the time he tased her until he was walking her away in handcuffs. He only put the mask back on when someone in the stands yelled out, asking him where his mask was. According to The Ohio Star, Tiffany Kennedy, a friend of Kitts who shot the video, said Kitts has asthma and had taken the mask off. Kitts’ mask is visible in her right back shorts pocket in the video. Ohio Coronavirus rules issued by Governor Mike DeWine require people to wear masks at outdoor events when 6-foot social distancing is not possible. Not wearing a mask in Ohio is considered a misdemeanor. Penalties for failure to comply can include up to 30 days in jail and a $750 fine. While DeWine said his intent isn’t to arrest people for non-compliance, he failed to veto a bill that would have reduced fines and banned jail time for non-compliance.

The fundamental problem with assaulting and arresting people for not complying with mask rules is that there’s no evidence to support the idea that masks prevent the spread of the virus. In fact, the science tells us masks cannot block viruses.

The Reasons Why Masks Are Useless
SARS-CoV-2 has a diameter between 0.06 and 0.14 microns. Medical N95 masks — which are considered the most effective — can filter particles as small as 0.3 microns ― but SARS-CoV-2 is even smaller! Surgical masks, homemade masks, T-shirts and bandanas are even more porous. Health agencies’ own research show it’s a futile measure that only provides a false sense of security.

The demand by stores that customers wear masks, fraudulently assumes that masks work. They do not. Air easily slips around all masks, such as the very large air gaps around the nose, cheeks and chin. Furthermore, the particle size of the Coronavirus is typically 1/1000th of the size of the spacing between threads of the mask itself. A Coronavirus is 0.1 microns. Holes in cloth masks are up to 100 microns. If you “zoom in” this is like expecting two threads, spaced as far apart as three football fields, 900 feet, to filter out a shoe the size of one foot. That is insane! Furthermore, there are 1000 microns per millimeter. The air gaps around the mask, by the nose, if they are half a centimeter, are 5,000 microns. A Coronavirus is 0.1 microns. The difference is 50,000 times in size. This gap is so big, and the virus is so small, it’s like two lines, 10 miles apart, (52,800 feet) trying to filter out a basketball (just under a foot).

Mask wearing is mental insanity. In both theory and actual fact, masks cannot possibly work and achieve what the mask-enforcers claim. Their position is not based on science, but rather, irrational fear, and irrational expectations that masks work, when they cannot and do not work. Since their position is based on insanity and the fraud that masks work―the demands for mandatory masking cannot be said to follow the law and be “reasonable”. Furthermore, restaurants are open, with up to 60-100 people eating at once, with nobody wearing a mask while eating, and that fully complies with the law. So how could one person not wearing a mask in a grocery store be a danger compared to that? Fraud also carries with it a prison sentence, as fraud is a felony. When informed that mandatory masking was a fraud, and therefore a felony, the Orange County board of Supervisors abandoned their mandatory mask policy, back on June 9th, 2020.

Even the World Health Organization’s June 5th, 2020, guidance memo on face mask use states “there is no direct evidence (from studies on COVID- 19 and in healthy people in the community) on the effectiveness of universal masking of healthy people in the community to prevent infection with respiratory viruses, including COVID-19.”

Similarly, a May 2020 policy review paper published in the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s journal, Emerging Infectious Diseases, concluded that “Our systematic review found no significant effect of face masks on transmission of laboratory-confirmed influenza.” This is highly relevant, as the influenza virus is about twice the size of SARS-CoV-2. If masks cannot prevent transmission of influenza, they certainly cannot prevent transmission of SARS-CoV-2.

How Effective (Ineffective) are the Various Kinds of Masks?
The COVID-19 pandemic has raised questions about the efficacy of wearing face masks to reduce the transmission of infectious disease. Health agencies are not always in agreement as to who should or should not be wearing masks. Experts were debating the effectiveness of wearing masks to reduce the risk of infection long before COVID-19 came into the picture. Certain masks are more useless than others, with valved masks being among the worst, followed by homemade cloth masks. This includes both commercial cloth masks and N95-rated masks with one or two exhale ports. The reason for this is because masks with breathing valves do not filter the out-breath.

The mandating of mask wearing has no basis in science. On the contrary, the available scientific evidence almost conclusively shows that mask wearing does not prevent the spread of infectious disease. Most studies have focused on influenza―and the results from such studies are more than sufficient, because Coronaviruses are about half the size of flu viruses. Therefore, if a mask cannot prevent the spread of the much larger influenza viruses, it is illogical to assume that masks can prevent the spread of a much smaller virus, especially if it is airborne. The ineffectiveness of masks is shown by the recent data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, which reports that 71% of COVID-19 patients reported “always” wearing a cloth mask or face covering in the 14 days preceding their illness; 14% reported having worn a mask “often.” This proves, in part, the ineffectiveness of mask wearing ― for 71% of COVID patients were always wearing the mask and they still contracted COVID.

► SURGICAL MASKS
Surgical masks (currently the standard light blue masks handed out in some stores) were introduced nearly a century ago for the purpose of protecting patients during surgery. Yet, researchers continue to question whether this established routine is necessary. In one study published in 2016, scientists found no difference in the infection rates of patients undergoing “clean” surgery, whether the surgical team was masked or unmasked. A clean surgery was defined as one in which the lungs, gut, genitals and bladder were not involved.

Researchers have also questioned whether wearing masks during the cold season actually cuts down on the number of health care professionals who get sick. The researchers collected data for 77 consecutive days during cold season and determined whether a cold was present. The intervention group wore masks at work and the control group did not. During the study period, one individual in the intervention and one in the control group got a cold. Although the study was small, the researchers felt there was not enough evidence to demonstrate the benefits of mask-wearing for health care workers in terms of preventing cold symptoms.

Investigations into the effectiveness of masks continued with a study published in BMJ (British Medical Journal). Since the results were released in 2015, the researchers have responded to their data in light of the COVID-19 pandemic. The study was aimed at comparing the effectiveness of cloth masks to that of medical masks in health care workers. They evaluated 14 secondary and tertiary level hospitals in Hanoi, Vietnam, using 1,607 participants who worked full-time in high-risk units. Their measurement outcome was clinical demonstration of respiratory illness, flu-like illness or laboratory-confirmed respiratory infection. The researchers found that those who wore cloth masks had a significantly higher rate of flu-like illness and all measured infections as compared to participants using medical masks. They cited moisture retention, reuse and poor filtration as potential reasons for the increased rates of infection. They wrote, “… cloth masks should not be recommended for HCWs [health care workers], particularly in high-risk situations, and guidelines need to be updated.”

► CLOTH MASKS
Just prior to the Coronavirus pandemic reaching the U.S., a team evaluated the effectiveness of low-cost cloth face masks. The team evaluated 20 types of cloth masks and found pore size could range from 80 to 500 nanometers. This is significantly larger than particulate matter with a diameter of 10 nanometers or less (PM10). They also found that the effectiveness was reduced by 20% after the mask had gone through the fourth cycle of washing and drying. Stretching of the surface altered pore size and washing reduced the number of microfibers within the pores, also altering the effectiveness of the mask. The study evaluated the effectiveness of reducing airflow in face covers with and without an outlet valve. They found that face covers without an outlet valve reduced the flow of air forward by more than 90%. Individuals using surgical, cloth masks and face shields had intense back and downward flow, which presents a hazard.

► N95 MASKS
Dr. Russell Blaylock, a neurosurgeon, speaks of a study in 2006 in which researchers evaluated the development of headaches in health care workers who were using an N95 face mask. Using a survey, they found that 37.3% reported mask-associated headaches and 32.9% said that this happened more than six times per month. The researchers concluded that the N95 face mask could increase the risk of headaches in health care providers and that using them for shorter periods of time could reduce the frequency and severity of their headaches. Wearing an N95 mask for up to three hours could have also changed nasal function, making it more difficult to breathe after the mask was removed. Before Dr. Blaylock went on to discuss the new evidence suggesting Coronaviruses may enter the brain, he pointed out: “There is another danger to wearing these masks on a daily basis, especially if worn for several hours. When a person is infected with a respiratory virus, they will expel some of the virus with each breath. If they are wearing a mask, especially an N95 mask or other tightly fitting mask, they will be constantly re-breathing the viruses, raising the concentration of the virus in the lungs and the nasal passages. We know that people who have the worst reactions to the Coronavirus have the highest concentrations of the virus early on.”

Based on past evidence, Dr. Blaylock questions whether wearing a mask could also reintroduce exhaled viruses deep into the nasal cavity, driving up the amount of virus in the upper respiratory tract and increasing the potential to enter the olfactory nerves and travel into the brain.

While an N95-rated mask with exhale port will not protect others, it may, however, still offer some protection for the wearer. If you’re wearing a mask, N95-rated masks are the most effective choice. The caveat is that it must be properly fitted and put on and removed as instructed. Medical staff must go through fit tests for medical N95 masks, which makes them an impractical choice for the general public.

Masks Cannot Filter Out Airborne Viruses
Masks will not prevent you from exhaling or inhaling the aerosolized virus. Cloth masks are clearly also the least preferable option if you want to reduce the spread of infection, as their ability to block larger respiratory droplets is also limited. In particular, N95 masks with airflow valves on the front should be avoided, as the valve lets out unfiltered air, thus negating the small benefit — the reduction in respiratory droplet emissions — you might get from a mask.

Interestingly, Friday September 18th, 2020, the CDC posted updated COVID-19 guidance on its “How COVID-19 Spreads” page that, for the first time, mentioned aerosol (airborne) transmission of SARS-CoV-2, saying “this is thought to be the main way the virus spreads.” If SARS-CoV-2 spreads primarily via aerosols (airborne), then requiring people to wear masks is illogical, seeing how masks cannot filter out airborne viruses.

The CDC also noted that aerosolized (airborne) viruses can travel farther than 6 feet — which is logical seeing how aerosolized viruses can remain suspended in the air for hours — and that “indoor environments without good ventilation increase this risk.” However, the CDC then deleted the mention of aerosols and the possibility of spread beyond 6 feet the following Monday, September 21st, saying a draft version of proposed changes had been posted “in error.”

As reported by Forbes: “Before Friday’s update, the CDC said large respiratory droplets (like from coughing or sneezing) at close range transmitted the virus, but now the now-deleted guidance added that ‘small particles, such as those in aerosols’ could infect people. There is growing evidence that droplets and airborne particles can remain suspended in the air and be breathed in by others, and travel distances beyond 6 feet,’ the now-removed guidance stated … Scientists say the new CDC guidance is important because cloth masks aren’t designed to protect the wearer from aerosols.”

The last sentence is a key one. Understanding that SARS-CoV-2 is aerosolized (airborne) and can remain suspended in air “is important because cloth masks aren’t designed to protect the wearer from aerosols.” Masks also, of course, cannot protect others from aerosolized viruses exhaled by someone wearing a mask―because if you are exhaling the virus, it will pass through the mask relatively easily into the outside air.
According to NBC News, the fact that SARS-CoV-2 is airborne is “already well-known, according to infectious disease experts,” so it’s unclear why the CDC would not want that information on its website and has been remarkably slow in acknowledging it. One has to wonder whether its delayed acknowledgment and rapid removal of this information has something to do with the fact that, if SARS-CoV-2 spreads by being airborne, then requiring people to wear masks is illogical, because masks cannot filter out airborne viruses. All a mask can do is limit the spread of respiratory droplets that have been contaminated by the virus―but the virus itself is far smaller than the droplet it has contaminated. This has been the argument against mask wearing all along.

SARS-CoV-2 Is Airborne, Which Makes Masks Ineffective
Dr. Jill Weatherhead, assistant professor of infectious diseases at Baylor College of Medicine in Houston, told NBC News that the admission that SARS-CoV-2 is aerosolized (airborne) was “not surprising or jarring.” The World Health Organization updated its COVID-19 guidance back in July to include aerosolized (i.e., airborne) transmission, at the urging of more than 200 scientists.

Joseph Allen, an associate professor in the department of environmental health at the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, also told NBC News that “The scientific community has been raising the alarm about this since February, that airborne spread can happen.” Dr. Ashish Jha, dean of the school of public health at Brown University, commented on the CDC’s deletion of the information about the virus being airborne, saying: “This is so destructive to this incredibly wonderful agency that we have loved and admired our entire careers. This is amateur hour!”

Testimonies From True Medical Experts
► JAMA, the Journal of the American Medical Association, agrees that face masks should only be used by “individuals who have symptoms of respiratory infection such as coughing, sneezing, or, in some cases, fever.” The authors go on to say there is no evidence masks used by healthy people can prevent others from becoming sick.

► DR. MICHAEL THOMAS OSTERHOLM (born 1953) is an American epidemiologist, regents professor, and director of the Center for Infectious Disease Research and Policy at the University of Minnesota. On November 9th, 2020, he was named a member of President-elect Joe Biden's COVID-19 Advisory Board. He has stated that surgical masks are useless: “I do have concern about that some people are highly reliant right now on the use of face mask (i.e. surgical mask) protection and think that’s going to reduce transmission. It is not! … Surgical masks, we know, are largely ineffective in preventing virus transmission” (Dr. Osterholm, CNN interview with Peter Bergen, March 11th, 2020).

► DR. ANDREW BOSTOM, of Brown University, noted in a July 11th, 2020, Medium post: “… limited, immediate-term experimental observations — equivocal at best — provide no rational, evidence-based justification for daily, prolonged mask usage by the general public to prevent infection with COVID-19. An analysis of 10 controlled trials―assessing extended, real-world, non-health-care-setting mask usage―revealed that masking did not reduce the rate of laboratory-proven infections with the respiratory virus influenza. The findings from this unique report — published May 2020 by the CDC’s own ‘house journal’ ‘Emerging Infectious Diseases’ — were analyzed and pooled, applying a rigorous, standardized methodology. None of these studies detect a significant benefit of masking for the reduction of confirmed influenza infection … The authors further concluded, with a caution, that using face masks improperly might ‘increase the risk for (viral) transmission.’”

► DR. DENIS RANCOURT, Ph.D., a former full professor of physics and researcher with the Ontario Civil Liberties Association in Canada, says that all of the well-designed studies that have been published so far, have failed to find a statistically significant advantage to wearing a mask versus not wearing one.

► DR. JUDY MIKOVITS, Ph.D. in biochemistry and molecular biology, says: “Can you believe they told everybody to wear a mask? If you have COPD and you wear a mask, you will kill yourself. You will cause the very disease you’re trying to prevent. Wearing the mask literally activates your own virus. You’re getting sick from your own reactivated Coronavirus expressions, and if it happens to be SARS-CoV-2, then you’ve got a big problem. Number one, if your mask is just this scarf cover of your face―all that does is make you breathe in and out. I see people running and riding bikes with these masks. It doesn’t prevent mold, mildew, all the stuff that’s in the air, the pollens [from] allergy season. Those go right there into your sinus cavity, into your nasopharyngeal cavity. You’re exercising. You’re breathing hard. You’re sucking that stuff into your lungs and you’re sucking back in CO2. We don’t do photosynthesis! We’re humans! We have to breathe oxygen! We can’t breathe back in our own toxic air! That’s why you exhale! That’s why you breathe deeply! That’s why you cough to expel a pathogen! If you cough in your own mask then you suppress your own immune system. You use your own “type one interferons” in your throat, in your nose, in your blood. It’s horribly immune suppressive. You’re not getting fresh air. You’re suppressing your immune response. You’re activating endogenous viruses. When you activate endogenous viruses, your immune system has to go and knock down those viruses. When you wear that mask, you’re concentrating antigens and you’re making yourself sicker. It is immune draining, not immune boosting. You’re making yourself sick with other sources. It makes no sense. You’re not preventing infection. I will not wear a mask. I just walk in the store and say, “Hey, I have a congenital lung disease, and I can’t wear a mask. Thank you very much for” ― I don’t say “for your stupidity” but ― “protecting me!” You don’t protect anybody. I worked in a bio-safety level three facility [laboratory] with HIV for 30 years. I pulled viruses out of saliva and blood. I never once wore a mask. I reminded Dr. Rossetti of this the other day. He said, “We wore masks.” I was like, “No, we didn’t! No, we didn’t!” We weren’t at risk until 2011 [when] it was realized that that mouse cancer causing retrovirus is contagious. Please take off the mask. Go outside if you’re healthy.”

► DR. RASHID BUTTAR says: “The information that the public needs to know is that staying home, wearing a mask is making everything worse. Wearing a mask? Remember ― we breathe in oxygen. When you wear a mask, you’re reducing the flow of oxygen. By reducing the flow of oxygen, you’re taxing your system. You’re going to cause a release of steroids, of cortisol, the stress hormone. When the stress hormone goes off, then you have a suppression of the immune system. That’s the reason that you have to be careful when you give transplant patients immune-suppressives to reduce their immune system so that doesn’t react [badly] to the organs. What did they die from? They die from infection. They die from opportunistic infection — things that wouldn’t have hurt you or me, but because the immune system has been rendered incapable of mounting a response from the steroids, that’s what they die from. They’re telling you [to] wear a mask ― which is now going to reduce your oxygen, which is going to stress your body, which is going to cause more cortisol production, which is going to suppress your immune system ― and now an opportunistic [infection] could cause a problem.”

► DR. RUSSELL BLAYLOCK, a neurosurgeon, warns that face masks: “… fail to protect the healthy from getting sick, but they also create serious health risks to the wearer. The bottom line is that if you are not sick, you should not wear a face mask.” He expressed some frustration at the wholesale use of face masks for the vulnerable and healthy individuals, pointing out, “When a person has TB, we have them wear a mask, not the entire community of non-infected.”

► DR. STANLEY YOUNG, Ph.D., an applied statistician who currently serves on the Environmental Protection Agency’s scientific advisory board. In an October 14th, 2020, article, he writes: “Dr. Mandy Cohen has told us we must wear masks in many kinds of settings. She told us that wearing the masks will help ‘fight’… SARS-CoV-2. Gov. Cooper has told us they are relying on ‘data and science.’ I am a scientist. I disagree.Not long ago, I considered the COVID data our health experts were giving us. If masks were so effective, why were we not seeing improvement in the numbers? I decided to dive into the literature ... I studied the studies and found one for influenza. The peer-reviewed meta-analysis study looked at flu viral transmission, using 10 randomized clinical trials. When you combine all 10, the study showed that the results are consistent with pure chance. The evidence suggested that the use of face masks―either by infected persons or by uninfected persons―does not have a substantial effect on influenza transmission … In pooled analysis, we found no significant reduction in influenza transmission with the use of face masks. Adding up those infected while wearing a mask, 156 out of 3,495 persons which is 4.46%, and those infected while not wearing a mask, 161 out of 3,052 persons which is 5.23%, the results are consistent with chance.

“I presented my opinion to Dr. Cohen and her staff. After some prodding, Mr. Fleischman, a senior official, provided me with another study that dealt specifically with the COVID-19 virus. The study looked at transmission of the virus. A total of 19 randomized studies were summarized. Here is what they had to say, ‘Medical masks were not effective, and cloth masks even less effective.’ Masks have always only been thought to stop large droplets. Transmission through very fine droplets cannot be stopped by ordinary masks. Most recently, the CDC has confirmed that the virus can be transmitted through fine droplets. The analysis that Mr. Fleischman had sent me supports this claim because, again, it showed no benefit to wearing masks. Incidentally, the Netherlands recently dropped the mask mandate saying the research did not support wearing them. These two scientific studies provide no scientific basis for one size fits all [universal mandatory masking]; if public health officials and politicians continue with mask mandates, then informed citizens might question if current policy is intended more to scare them, than follow the science.”

► DENMARK’S MEDICAL RESEARCHERS ― Perhaps the most damning evidence of all is that of Danish researchers who recently conducted a randomized trial in an effort to prove the usefulness of face masks against COVID-19 infection―but ended up proving the opposite. They now are complaining they cannot find a publisher who will publish their findings! Hmm! Medical peer review journals are simply refusing to accept the paper. Why? Hmm! The study, which is currently only available in German, concluded tens of millions of contaminations can occur each day as people use the masks inappropriately, touch their faces and neglect to wash their hands. For this reason, universal mask wearing may actually do more harm than good. This is clearly important information that should be communicated to the general public, yet medical journals are shunning the research paper and its surprising findings, probably because it doesn’t align with their narrative that supports universal mask recommendations.

Flip-Flopping Fauci
Dr. Anthony Fauci has been made out to be the prominent public leader and expert for the Coronavirus response in the U.S., but his flip-flopping betrays either a lack of “expertise” or a more nefarious tactic of deliberate misinformation. Way back in March, in a 60 Minute COVID-19 segment that was broadcast on March 8th, 2020, Fauci said masks are “important for someone who is infected to prevent them from infecting someone else,” but that “right now in the United States, people should not be walking around with masks; there’s no reason to walk around with a mask.” He also noted that “when you’re in the middle of an outbreak, wearing a mask may make you feel a little bit better, and it might even block a droplet, but it’s not providing the perfect protection that people think that it is.” He also pointed out there are unintended consequences of mask wearing that can increase your infection risk, things like touching your mask and then touching your face.

A couple weeks later, in early April 2020, he suddenly did a radical about-turn and changed his message, urging people to wear cloth masks in public unless they could maintain a 6-foot distance from others.

By mid-June 2020, when pressed about his turnabout on masks, he stated he’d initially downplayed the benefits of face masks, due to concerns about personal protective equipment (PPE) shortages. The clear subtext was “I lied to you because I thought it was for the greater good.” If he is willing to lie about this, how can he possibly be trusted about other recommendations? In March, he accurately confirmed that masks are ineffective and offer a false sense of security. Then, when he did recommend mask wearing, he recommended wearing the least effective mask alternative — cloth masks, for which there are no standards at all.

At the end of July 2020 — just days after getting caught at a baseball game with his mask pulled below his chin — Fauci started recommending the addition of face shields to protect the mucous membranes of your eyes. Then, October 23rd, 2020, he suddenly announced his support for a federal mask mandate to ensure nationwide compliance.

As reported by Life Site News, July 31st, 2020: “Fauci … suggested that masking should morph from a temporary emergency measure to a permanent seasonal practice: ‘It is inevitable that we're going to have some degree of flu. I'm hoping that the wearing of masks and other coverings are going to not only protect us against COVID-19, but also help protect us against influenza.’” In what appears to be an effort to back up the mask mandates for COVID-19, Fauci is now also endorsing the wearing of masks during every influenza season going forward.

Why? Not only has the science not changed — it still shows masks do not decrease infection rates — but a federal mandate also fails to take into account the level of threat in individual states or cities. What’s more, in a September 15th, 2020, press conference, he stated that “a national mandate probably would not work.”

Some areas have and are doing quite well in terms of infection rates, hospitalizations and deaths. Why should people in those areas be forced to wear masks even in the absence of a significant threat? (And that’s supposing masks worked in the first place.) As reported by CNN October 23rd, 2020:

“‘If people are not wearing masks, then maybe we should be mandating it,’ the leading infectious disease expert [Fauci] told CNN’s Erin Burnett Friday … Mask mandates may be tricky to enforce, but it might be time to call for them, Fauci said.‘There’s going to be a difficulty enforcing it, but if everyone agrees that this is something that’s important and they mandate it and everybody pulls together and says, you know, we’re going to mandate it but let’s just do it, I think that would be a great idea to have everybody do it uniformly,’ he said. As cooler weather comes, people need to ‘double down’ on measures that work, Fauci said. ‘Universal mask wearing’ is one, he said, as is keeping a distance from others and frequent hand washing.”

Ironically, Fauci has stated that “the data on face masks speaks for itself.” Now, if we were all to agree that the data does speak for itself, then there would be no mask mandates―because the data clearly do NOT support this measure for the public at large.

Why Are They so Persistent With Mask Recommendations?
Considering the strong scientific evidence against it, why are governments so persistent in their recommendation of mask wearing? Clearly, for many, wearing a bandana or cloth mask provides a form of psychological defense, a way to feel less fearful because it feels like you’re doing something to protect yourself and others. But it’s a false sense of security.

But with COVID-19 fatality rates as low as they are, why would governments be pushing for a false sense of security? According to a September 2nd, 2020, study in the Annals of Internal Medicine, the overall non-institutionalized COVID-19 fatality ratio is 0.26%. For those younger than 40, the infection fatality ratio is 0.01%, while those aged 60 or older have a fatality ratio of 1.71%. The estimated infection fatality rate for seasonal influenza listed in this paper is 0.8%. So, the only people for whom SARS-CoV-2 infection is more dangerous than influenza, is those who are over the age of 60.

Mandatory mask wearing, social distancing, lockdowns and business shut-downs are clearly completely unnecessary at this point, unless your goal is to increase fear, tyranny; crash the economy and transfer of wealth to the upper 0.001% who can benefit from collapsing the economy. Furthermore, it seems mask requirements are being used as a psychological manipulation tool to encourage compliance with vaccination once a vaccine becomes available. It can also be viewed as a badge of submission to tyranny. The future tradeoff that will be offered to everyone: Mask mandates will be dropped provided everyone gets vaccinated. By then, many may be willing to take or do just about anything, as long as they don’t have to wear a mask anymore — although some warn that masks may remain a requirement for years to come, even with a vaccine.

Article 19
Is the Thought of Mandatory Vaccinations Needling You?

This article is currently being written. Sections will be posted as they are completed. Please check back later.

Who Likes Being Needled?
All 50 states now require children to be vaccinated for multiple diseases before they’re allowed to begin kindergarten. California requires vaccinations before kids can attend preschool or go to daycare, with no religious exemptions allowed. California removed the option for parents to obtain a religious exemption from vaccinating their children, because tech oligarchs in Silicon Valley and wealthy elites in Hollywood were all refusing to vaccinate their kids based on religious exemption! It’s remarkable how religious they suddenly became when the state began mandating medical treatments for their own children, isn’t it?

Given that the vaccination issue now impacts all families in America, directly or indirectly, you’d think it would have garnered more media attention when it was learned that vaccine champion and Microsoft founder Bill Gates refused to allow his own children to be vaccinated. This admission came from the Gates family’s personal physician in Seattle, who was speaking behind closed doors with other doctors at a symposium in 2018 (someone at the conference leaked the conversation, so the doctor himself technically did not violate doctor-patient confidentiality rules). The doctor reportedly told his colleagues, “I don’t know if he (Gates) had them vaccinated as adults, but I can tell you he point blank refused to vaccinate them as children.”

Bill Gates―and his friends among the wealthy elites―refuse to submit their own children to the mandatory vaccinations, while they expect the rest of the world to submit to vaccination. It also seems like Bill Gates and the elites know something about vaccines that the rest of us aren’t being told.

Completely Safe and Effective?
Just like all parents will say: “My Johnny is a good boy!” Pfizer officials say their vaccine is “completely safe and effective.” Yet just as many a teacher will testify that “Johnny is not always a good boy, but a terror at times!” likewise there are many horror stories about this new ‘miracle’ COVID vaccine coming in from all quarters of the world. Australia suddenly stopped its trials of the vaccine in mid-December (2020) after multiple test subjects suddenly tested positive for HIV. One must wonder why people would develop HIV (AIDS) after getting the COVID vaccine? Well, it is because the vaccine contains a protein from the HIV virus! That is only one among many other dangerous — and SINISTER — ingredients.

Other “nasties” in the COVID vaccine are Formaldehyde, which is embalming fluid; then there’s Aluminum, shown to cause neurotoxicity, Alzheimer’s disease and cancer; next, an ingredient called Nagalase, which is a protein excreted by cancer cells―It is found in patients with cancer, autism, diabetes, immune disorders and viral and bacterial infections. Mercury is also a prominent ingredient. Mercury is known to cause genetic mutation and negative effects on the nervous system and reproductive organs. Exposure to mercury in unborn babies has been proven to cause severe birth defects. Furthermore, there’s an ingredient called “HEK-293.” This refers to “human embryonic kidney cells,” which are again taken from aborted babies, but these are a completely different human cell line. Then there are the aborted fetal tissue! The Pfizer COVID vaccine contains cells from an aborted 14-week-old Caucasian male, containing complete human genome DNA. You may be interested to know that the COVID vaccine ALSO contains a strain of the Coronavirus itself — taken from chimpanzees — and engineered to create the spike protein of SARS-CoV-2, the virus that CAUSES COVID-19. In addition to all these toxic chemicals, you also get multiple DNA cells from aborted babies, Coronavirus taken from chimpanzees and one MORE ingredient that should concern you ― it’s called LUCIFERASE. This is a bioluminescent photo-protein with the ability to monitor and track a person’s health and vaccination status digitally. This is a cloned gene from the North American firefly ― “Lucifer” is Latin for “light-bringer”, and fire give light, the firefly gives light … interesting, huh … a fly of fire giving light? Especially when you realize that the name of the devil Beelzebub is translated as the “Lord of the Flies.”

Ignore God-Made Cures and Replace Them with Inferior (Poisonous) Man-Made Concoctions
We have a God-created and God-given immune system; and we also have (non-patented) God-created and God-given medicine in the form of a wide variety of food and herbs that help preserve, stimulate and strengthen that immune system. Yet for these godless rich men―more intent on lining their pockets with more money, than they are in truly caring for the well-being of others―neglect, ignore or even ridicule these God-created and God-given benefits. So, instead of focusing on teaching people how to build and strengthen their own immune systems to fight off this virus, (from which more than 99% recover from naturally), they are actually now injecting people with the virus itself — along with genetically-modified DNA strands and flat-out POISONS. Why? Follow the money. The Coronavirus “PLANNED-demic” has been a huge money-maker for many of the world’s top corporations. On average, a Big Pharma (pharmaceutical) company makes over $750 for each single dollar it invests in researching and producing a vaccine. Consider Amazon as just one example in the retail industry. While the majority of the world was under “lockdown” and local stores forced to close their doors; others requiring masking, social distancing and other draconian measures in order to enter, Amazon’s business more than doubled due to its online sales.

To Needle or Not to Needle? What’s the Point?
It’s already been stated in multiple countries — including the USA — that the vaccine SHOULD (but they will tread gently FOR NOW) be made mandatory, and that, unless you have proof of vaccination, you will need to be “quarantined” indefinitely for your own safety and the safety of others―which means you will not be able to publicly buy or sell, hold a job, or travel anywhere outside your home. In Canada, “quarantine camps” are now being fast-tracked in every Canadian province, each one able to hold up to 1,600 people. These camps are being prepared now, for those who refuse vaccination, and therefore must be considered a public health risk and quarantined under supervision. According to reports―straight out of the Canadian Parliament―these camps will be operated by an unspecified “third party.” So, it is a case of “Be vaccinated, or else!”

Dr. Fauci—the career National Institutes of Health official―elevated by the media to the status of COVID-19 Grand Poobah—told the U.K. that people must resist their “independent spirit” and just “do what you’re told” if they want the virus to go away. “Each of our countries have that independent spirit, where we don’t want to be told what to do,” he said. “Well, I understand that―but now is the time to do what you’re told.”

Fauci also said there would be a “core of people” who would never take a vaccine and that it would be “problematic” if up to 50% of the American population refused to receive it, adding: “I think there has been an anti-authority component to this, we had ‘anti-vax’ people who don’t like to be told to be vaccinated … Scientists are often perceived as authoritarian and sometimes in fact they’ve made that perception themselves by the way they act. I think we can improve on that.”

Mommy Knows What Best For You! Fauci Knows What’s Best For You! Or Does He?
In March 2015, Dr. Anthony Fauci—the career National Institutes of Health official―elevated by the media to the status of COVID-19 Grand Poobah—told PBS’s Frontline, with a straight face, that risks from vaccines are “almost non-measurable.” Fauci then proceeded to downplay every potential vaccine risk proposed by the interviewer, stating that each had “no basis in reality.” Having served at the helm of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) since 1984, Fauci surely was aware then―and is still aware now―that the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, which was established in the late 1980s, has paid out billions of dollars to vaccine-injured persons―$4.3 billion as of April 1st, 2020. Did Fauci feel that he could get away with making such dismissive statements because he knew about the Harvard study from 2010 showing that fewer than 1% of vaccine adverse events get reported—and what isn’t reported can’t be measured, right? So, of course, if you are deliberately ignoring 99% of vaccine injuries, then you can deceitfully say that risks from vaccines are “almost non-measurable.”

Much has been made of Fauci’s, NIAID’s and the NIH’s cozy entanglements with Bill Gates, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation and the Gates-Foundation-created Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations (CEPI), particularly in light of the massive Gates Foundation and CEPI funding being directed toward Coronavirus vaccines that the NIH is also supporting. Gates recently called for digital “certificates” showing who has received an eventual Coronavirus vaccine and also made veiled statements that “you don’t want people moving around the world” unless they have received a vaccine. In that context, Fauci’s additional remarks in the 2015 Frontline interview take on somewhat ominous overtones. The ‘good’ doctor stated that while “there’s never a situation where someone is going to tie you down and vaccinate you ... you don’t want the respect for autonomy of people to get in the way of a public health mandate.”

From Mediocre Vaccines to Miracle Vaccines! How?
What is most baffling is the fact that they cannot develop a really successful vaccine for the common annual flu―yet they pull a miraculous rabbit out of the hat when it comes to a never-before-seen, far more deadly, this could kill the whole planet, and whatever other verbal icing you want to put on the Covid-Cake! How is this possible? It is like a child continually failing to pass an 8th Grade Science test, and yet claims it could earn a scientific degree in Chemistry! Get this drilled into your head―VACCINES ARE NOT VERY EFFECTIVE AT WHAT THEY CLAIM TO DO! Below is a chart on the effectiveness of the flu vaccine throughout the last decade.

Quoting “straight from the horse’s mouth” ― the CDC (United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention), they say that: “While vaccine effectiveness can vary, recent studies show that flu vaccination reduces the risk of flu illness by between 40% and 60% among the overall population during seasons when most circulating flu viruses are well-matched to the flu vaccine. How well the flu vaccine works (or its ability to prevent flu illness) can vary from season to season. The vaccine’s effectiveness also can vary depending on who is being vaccinated.

“At least two factors play an important role in determining the likelihood that flu vaccine will protect a person from flu illness: (1) characteristics of the person being vaccinated (such as their age and health), and (2) the similarity or “match” between the flu viruses the flu vaccine is designed to protect against and the flu viruses spreading in the community. During years when the flu vaccine is not well matched to circulating influenza viruses, it is possible that little or no benefit from flu vaccination may be observed. During years when there is a good match between the flu vaccine and circulating viruses, it is possible to measure substantial benefits from flu vaccination in terms of preventing flu illness and complications.

“However, even during years when the flu vaccine match is good, the benefits of flu vaccination will vary, depending on various factors like the characteristics of the person being vaccinated, what influenza viruses are circulating that season and even, potentially, which type of flu vaccine was used. Flu vaccines do NOT protect against infection and illness caused by other viruses that also can cause flu-like symptoms. There are many other viruses besides flu viruses that can result in flu-like illness (also known as influenza-like illness) that spread during the flu season. These non-flu viruses include rhinovirus (one cause of the “common cold”) and respiratory syncytial virus (RSV), which is the most common cause of severe respiratory illness in young children, and a major cause of severe respiratory illness in adults aged 65 years and older. Protection against influenza type A flu viruses has been less consistent. On average, flu vaccines have reduced the risk of doctor visits with type A flu by 24% and reduced the risk of hospitalization with type A flu by 33% in adults age 65 and older.” (CDC ― the United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, https://www.cdc.gov/flu/vaccines-work/vaccineeffect.htm).

Article 20
Is it a Mutated Virus? Or is it a Mutated Lie?

This article is currently being written. Sections will be posted as they are completed. Please check back later.

Has the Virus Caught a Virus?
It seems that modern-day viruses are like modern-day people―they are always looking for a change! They quickly grow tired of the “same old, same old…!” Everything must change these days! Customs, fashions, teachings, traditions, truths, etc. have all caught the “virus of change” and change they must! It seems like the Covid-19 virus has also caught the “virus of change” and has now mutated into something different!

The realistic and non-fudged mortality data shows that COVID-19 is hardly the deadly pandemic it was made out to be. Just as people were starting to wake up to this fact, the British technocracy came up with a new narrative to keep the fear-mongering going. Mere days before Christmas, U.K. Prime Minister, Boris Johnson, announced there was a new, mutated, and far more infectious, strain of SARS-CoV-2 on the loose.

On December 23rd, 2020―just four weeks ago―Reuters News Agency reported that the British government had indicated that huge swathes of England would be placed under its strictest COVID-19 restrictions because a highly infectious virus variant was sweeping the country, pushing the number of cases to a record level. Britain reported almost 40,000 new infections as the mutated variant of the Coronavirus, which could be up to 70% more transmissible than the original, causes the number of cases and hospital admissions to soar. The number of recorded deaths ― 744 ― was also the highest figure since April. The answer and solution? Another round of even stricter stay-at-home orders, business shutdowns and travel bans, just in time for the holidays.

The viral lineage leading to this new virus―named “B.1.1.7”―has accumulated 23 mutations. Scientists were particularly concerned about 8 of those 23 mutations, that affect the gene for a protein called spike on the surface of Coronaviruses. That's because the viruses use the spike protein to grab onto human cells.

The U.K. Minister for Health, Matt Hancock gave Britain an early Christmas present, saying: “We simply cannot have the kind of Christmas that we all yearn for! Against this backdrop of rising infections, rising hospitalizations and rising numbers of people dying from Coronavirus, it is absolutely vital that we act!”

Suddenly, tight social mixing restrictions measures were brought in for London, southeast England and Wales while plans to ease curbs over Christmas across the nation were either dramatically scaled back or scrapped altogether. Hancock added that from December 26th, many more parts of southern England would be also be added to the highest level of social mixing restrictions, joining the 16 million already in Tier 4, while other areas across the country currently in lower tiers would also face tighter curbs.

“Yikes!” You will say, “Is the new strain of Covid from the U.K. more dangerous?” Well, the answer is: “No. From what we know so far, the new B117 variant does not appear to cause more serious illness or increased risk of death than previous strains of COVID-19.”

Indeed, on January 20th, 2021, Reuters News Agency again reporting on the U.K. lockdowns, ran their article under the title: “No Evidence of Decline in COVID-19 Rates in England’s Third Lockdown”, stating: “A third pandemic lockdown appears to be having little impact on rates of COVID-19 in England, researchers warned on Thursday, with prevalence of the disease very high and no evidence of decline in the first 10 days of renewed restrictions.”

According to The New York Times, the U.K. restrictions may remain in effect for months. Considering these unscientific strategies didn’t work the first or second time around, it strains believability to think they’ll work now. Yet, anyone who knows anything about the Great Reset agenda, can now see that the lockdowns―which destroy local economies and small businesses―have nothing to do with public health. They are mere smokescreens for the greatest transfer (if not theft) of wealth the world has ever seen. The biggest losers are low- and middle-income earners, especially private business owners, who have been absolutely decimated while large box stores and multinational companies report record-breaking profits.

Despite the obviousness of the Great Reset scheme hiding behind the virus agenda, countries are responding to the news of the mutation with fervor. The Netherlands, Italy, Belgium, France, Germany, Poland, Austria, Denmark, Bulgaria and Ireland were among the first to issue travel restrictions from the U.K. The response from the U.S. has been mixed, with political figures such as New York State governor Andrew Cuomo first calling for suspending airline flights from the U.K., then shifting to ask for mandatory testing of travelers. But scientists such as Anthony Fauci, director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, say that flight bans are probably too late to stop the variant spreading to the U.S. “I would not be surprised at all if it is already here,” he told Good Morning America on December 22nd, 2020.